• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球范围内野火灰的化学特性及其环境和社会经济影响。

Chemical characteristics of wildfire ash across the globe and their environmental and socio-economic implications.

机构信息

Centre for Wildfire Research, Department of Geography, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.

Centre for Wildfire Research, Department of Geography, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom; Research Institute of Biodiversity (IMIB; CSIC-UniOvi-PA), Mieres, Spain.

出版信息

Environ Int. 2023 Aug;178:108065. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.108065. Epub 2023 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2023.108065
PMID:37562341
Abstract

The mobilisation of potentially harmful chemical constituents in wildfire ash can be a major consequence of wildfires, posing widespread societal risks. Knowledge of wildfire ash chemical composition is crucial to anticipate and mitigate these risks. Here we present a comprehensive dataset on the chemical characteristics of a wide range of wildfire ashes (42 types and a total of 148 samples) from wildfires across the globe and examine their potential societal and environmental implications. An extensive review of studies analysing chemical composition in ash was also performed to complement and compare our ash dataset. Most ashes in our dataset had an alkaline reaction (mean pH 8.8, ranging between 6 and 11.2). Important constituents of wildfire ash were organic carbon (mean: 204 g kg), calcium, aluminium, and iron (mean: 47.9, 17.9 and 17.1 g kg). Mean nitrogen and phosphorus ranged between 1 and 25 g kg, and between 0.2 and 9.9 g kg, respectively. The largest concentrations of metals of concern for human and ecosystem health were observed for manganese (mean: 1488 mg kg; three ecosystems > 1000 mg kg), zinc (mean: 181 mg kg; two ecosystems > 500 mg kg) and lead (mean: 66.9 mg kg; two ecosystems > 200 mg kg). Burn severity and sampling timing were key factors influencing ash chemical characteristics like pH, carbon and nitrogen concentrations. The highest readily dissolvable fractions (as a % of ash dry weight) in water were observed for sodium (18 %) and magnesium (11.4 %). Although concentrations of elements of concern were very close to, or exceeded international contamination standards in some ashes, the actual effect of ash will depend on factors like ash loads and the dilution into environmental matrices such as water, soil and sediment. Our approach can serve as an initial methodological standardisation of wildfire ash sampling and chemical analysis protocols.

摘要

野火灰中潜在有害物质成分的迁移可能是野火的一个主要后果,给社会带来广泛的风险。了解野火灰的化学成分对于预测和减轻这些风险至关重要。在这里,我们提供了一个来自全球各地野火灰的化学特征的广泛数据集(42 种类型,共 148 个样本),并研究了它们对社会和环境的潜在影响。我们还对分析灰分化学组成的研究进行了广泛的回顾,以补充和比较我们的灰分数据集。我们数据集中的大多数灰分呈碱性反应(平均 pH 值 8.8,范围为 6 到 11.2)。野火灰的重要成分是有机碳(平均:204 克/千克)、钙、铝和铁(平均:47.9、17.9 和 17.1 克/千克)。氮和磷的平均值分别在 1 到 25 克/千克和 0.2 到 9.9 克/千克之间。对于人类和生态系统健康有潜在关注的金属中,锰的浓度最大(平均值:1488 毫克/千克;三个生态系统超过 1000 毫克/千克)、锌(平均值:181 毫克/千克;两个生态系统超过 500 毫克/千克)和铅(平均值:66.9 毫克/千克;两个生态系统超过 200 毫克/千克)。燃烧程度和采样时间是影响灰分化学特征(如 pH 值、碳和氮浓度)的关键因素。在水中最易溶解的部分(占灰分干重的百分比)是钠(18%)和镁(11.4%)。尽管一些灰分中的某些元素的浓度接近或超过国际污染标准,但灰分的实际影响将取决于灰分负荷以及与水、土壤和沉积物等环境基质的稀释等因素。我们的方法可以作为野火灰采样和化学分析方法的初步标准化方法。

相似文献

1
Chemical characteristics of wildfire ash across the globe and their environmental and socio-economic implications.全球范围内野火灰的化学特性及其环境和社会经济影响。
Environ Int. 2023 Aug;178:108065. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.108065. Epub 2023 Jun 25.
2
Emerging investigator series: physicochemical properties of wildfire ash and implications for particle stability in surface waters.新兴研究者系列:野火灰的物理化学性质及其对地表水中颗粒稳定性的影响。
Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2022 Nov 16;24(11):2129-2139. doi: 10.1039/d2em00216g.
3
Wildfires Alter Forest Watersheds and Threaten Drinking Water Quality.野火改变森林流域,威胁饮用水水质。
Acc Chem Res. 2019 May 21;52(5):1234-1244. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00670. Epub 2019 May 6.
4
Designing tools to predict and mitigate impacts on water quality following the Australian 2019/2020 wildfires: Insights from Sydney's largest water supply catchment.设计工具以预测和减轻澳大利亚 2019/2020 年野火对水质的影响:来自悉尼最大供水集水区的见解。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2021 Nov;17(6):1151-1161. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4406. Epub 2021 May 13.
5
Impacts of Forest Fire Ash on Aquatic Mercury Cycling.森林火灾灰对水生汞循环的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2022 Aug 16;56(16):11835-11844. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c01591. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
6
Quantity, composition and water contamination potential of ash produced under different wildfire severities.不同野火严重程度下产生的灰分的数量、组成和水污染潜力。
Environ Res. 2015 Oct;142:297-308. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.06.041. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
7
Cytotoxic effects of wildfire ashes: In-vitro responses of skin cells.野火灰的细胞毒性作用:皮肤细胞的体外反应。
Environ Pollut. 2021 Sep 15;285:117279. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117279. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
8
Impact of wildfire recurrence on soil properties and organic carbon fractions.野火复发对土壤性质和有机碳组分的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Mar;354:120293. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120293. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
9
Do Freshwater and Marine Bivalves Differ in Their Response to Wildfire Ash? Effects on the Antioxidant Defense System and Metal Body Burden.淡水和海洋双壳贝类对野火灰的反应有何不同?对抗氧化防御系统和金属体负荷的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 11;20(2):1326. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021326.
10
Severe western Canadian wildfire affects water quality even at large basin scales.加拿大西部严重野火甚至在大流域尺度上影响水质。
Water Res. 2020 Sep 15;183:116071. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116071. Epub 2020 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic responses of gut microbiota to agricultural and wildfire ash: insights from different amphibian developmental stages.肠道微生物群对农业灰分和野火灰分的动态响应:来自不同两栖动物发育阶段的见解
Front Microbiol. 2025 Aug 13;16:1598446. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1598446. eCollection 2025.
2
Post-fire soil hazards: recommendations for updated soil testing protocols and clearance thresholds.火灾后土壤危害:更新土壤检测方案和清除阈值的建议
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2025 Aug 8. doi: 10.1038/s41370-025-00796-w.
3
Regarding the possible impact of forest fires on the radioactive pollution of groundwater in the chornobyl exclusion zone.
关于森林火灾对切尔诺贝利禁区地下水放射性污染的可能影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 22;15(1):13910. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99095-5.
4
Impact of Canadian Wildfire-Emitted Particulate Matter on THP-1 Lung Macrophage Health and Function.加拿大野火排放的颗粒物对THP-1肺巨噬细胞健康和功能的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2025 Mar 4;59(8):3869-3883. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c10304. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
5
Speciation and Aqueous Dissolution of Macronutrients in Fire Ash: Variation across Ecosystems and the Effects on Nutrient Cycling.火灰中大量营养素的物种形成与水溶解:生态系统间的差异及其对养分循环的影响
Environ Sci Technol. 2025 Jan 14;59(1):454-466. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c07101. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
6
Intersection of Wildfire and Legacy Mining Poses Risks to Water Quality.野火与遗留采矿的交叉对水质构成风险。
Environ Sci Technol. 2025 Jan 14;59(1):35-44. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c09489. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
7
Effects of Large-Scale Wildfires on the Redistribution of Radionuclides in the Chornobyl River System.大规模野火对切尔诺贝利河流系统中放射性核素再分布的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Nov 19;58(46):20630-20641. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c07019. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
8
Thermochemical Transformation of Calcium during Biomass Burning and the Effects on Postfire Aqueous Dissolution of Macronutrients.生物质燃烧过程中钙的热化学转化及其对大火后大量营养物质水溶的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Oct 1;58(39):17304-17312. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c04820. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
9
Estimated Impacts of Prescribed Fires on Air Quality and Premature Deaths in Georgia and Surrounding Areas in the US, 2015-2020.2015-2020 年佐治亚州及周边地区计划火烧对空气质量和过早死亡人数的预估影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Jul 16;58(28):12343-12355. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c00890. Epub 2024 Jun 29.