Suppr超能文献

火灾后土壤危害:更新土壤检测方案和清除阈值的建议

Post-fire soil hazards: recommendations for updated soil testing protocols and clearance thresholds.

作者信息

Allen Joseph G, Azimi Parham, Pei Gen, Feguson Lauren, Burghardt Lindsey, Nadeau Kari

机构信息

Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Center on the Developing Child, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2025 Aug 8. doi: 10.1038/s41370-025-00796-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Urban wildfires in Los Angeles have highlighted the increased risk of soil lead exposure, especially for children. Current post-wildfire soil remediation protocols may not sufficiently protect public health, especially in communities returning after fire events.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the adequacy of existing soil remediation practices after urban wildfires in Los Angeles and present policy recommendations to reduce lead exposure risk.

METHODS

We reviewed current wildfire debris removal protocols, soil testing practices, and health risk benchmarks for lead exposure in California. We assessed recent data from post-fire soil testing and analyzed the scientific rationale underlying California's existing Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG) for lead in residential soil.

RESULTS

We recommend two critical reforms: requiring post-clearance confirmatory soil testing after wildfire cleanup, as has been done for every major wildfire in California since 2007, and lowering California's residential Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG) for lead in soil from 80 to 55 mg/kg to reflect updated science and health-protective standards. The basis for these recommendations is that repeated testing after purported soil remediation is showing that greater than 20% of properties still have lead levels that exceed existing thresholds, and the 80 mg/kg PRG (1) does not adhere to the health-based toxicity criterion benchmark set by California, (2) is susceptible to high uncertainty based on the values for several exposure factors used, and (3) does not accurately reflect our current understanding of risks to children from lead.

IMPACT STATEMENT

This article identifies critical gaps in current post-wildfire remediation protocols that leave Los Angeles residents, especially children, at risk of lead exposure from contaminated soil. By recommending policy reforms including mandatory post-remediation soil testing and a more protective soil lead standard, our work provides an actionable roadmap to strengthen environmental health protections for communities recovering from wildfires. Adoption of these measures will help ensure a safer, healthier future in the face of escalating urban wildfire threats.

摘要

背景

洛杉矶的城市野火凸显了土壤铅暴露风险的增加,尤其是对儿童而言。当前的野火后土壤修复方案可能无法充分保护公众健康,特别是在火灾事件后回迁的社区。

目的

评估洛杉矶城市野火后现有土壤修复措施的充分性,并提出降低铅暴露风险的政策建议。

方法

我们回顾了当前的野火残骸清除方案、土壤检测实践以及加利福尼亚州铅暴露的健康风险基准。我们评估了近期火灾后土壤检测的数据,并分析了加利福尼亚州现有住宅土壤铅初步修复目标(PRG)背后的科学依据。

结果

我们建议进行两项关键改革:要求在野火清理后进行清理后确认性土壤检测,自2007年以来加利福尼亚州的每一场重大野火都已如此;将加利福尼亚州住宅土壤铅的初步修复目标(PRG)从80毫克/千克降至55毫克/千克,以反映最新的科学和健康保护标准。这些建议的依据是,在所谓的土壤修复后进行的反复检测表明,超过20%的房产铅含量仍超过现有阈值,并且80毫克/千克的PRG(1)不符合加利福尼亚州设定的基于健康的毒性标准基准,(2)基于所使用的几个暴露因素的值易受高不确定性影响,(3)不能准确反映我们目前对铅对儿童风险的理解。

影响声明

本文指出了当前野火后修复方案中的关键差距,这些差距使洛杉矶居民,尤其是儿童,面临受污染土壤铅暴露的风险。通过建议包括强制性修复后土壤检测和更具保护性的土壤铅标准在内的政策改革,我们的工作提供了一个可操作的路线图,以加强对从野火中恢复的社区的环境卫生保护。采取这些措施将有助于在城市野火威胁不断升级的情况下确保更安全、更健康的未来。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验