Leserre Daniel
Licenciado en Psicología (UBA), Doctor en Filosofía (UBA), Investigador (CONICET 1992-2018).
Vertex. 2023 Jul 10;34(160, abr.-jun.):113-122. doi: 10.53680/vertex.v34i160.464.
The discussion on the scientific character of psychoanalysis is continuous and multifaceted. Nowadays the extent and variety of the implied aspects in it is even increased. In this context this article presents for its analysis and assessment a reconsideration of Freud’s line of argument regarding the scientific character of psychoanalysis. Against a quite spread view that conceives Freud’s scientific perspective as a reflex of general traits of his time such as positivism, sustained by recent research on Freud this article proposes the reconsideration of Freud’s perspective in a more exhaustive and nuanced way and holds that it is based on a composed by integrated parts, unified and consistent line of argument maintained through all his work. The reconsideration of the design of Freud’s argument allows to hold that his own formulation is still fruitful and suitable for the present, particularly as it possibilitates, justifies and requires the connection of psychoanalysis to the development of knowledge.
关于精神分析科学性的讨论持续不断且涉及多方面。如今，其中隐含的各个方面的范围和多样性甚至有所增加。在此背景下，本文为其分析和评估重新审视了弗洛伊德关于精神分析科学性的论证思路。与一种相当普遍的观点不同，这种观点认为弗洛伊德的科学视角是他那个时代的一般特征（如实证主义）的反映，基于对弗洛伊德的最新研究，本文提议以更详尽、更细致入微的方式重新审视弗洛伊德的观点，并认为它基于贯穿其所有作品的、由各个部分整合而成的、统一且连贯的论证思路。对弗洛伊德论证设计的重新审视使得我们能够认为他自己的表述仍然富有成效且适用于当下，特别是因为它使精神分析与知识发展的联系成为可能、合理且必要。
