Suppr超能文献

比较 RBPT、I-ELISA 和 CFT 三种方法对埃塞俄比亚绵羊、山羊和牛血清中布鲁氏菌病的诊断价值,以及从这些动物血清中用 PCR 检测布鲁氏菌属的情况。

Comparative evaluation of RBPT, I-ELISA, and CFT for the diagnosis of brucellosis and PCR detection of Brucella species from Ethiopian sheep, goats, and cattle sera.

机构信息

Research and Development Directorate, National Veterinary Institute, P.O. Box 19, Bishoftu, Ethiopia.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Sub-Regional Office for Eastern Africa, P.O. Box 5536, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

出版信息

BMC Microbiol. 2023 Aug 10;23(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12866-023-02962-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Brucellosis is an economically devastating animal disease and has public health concern. Serological methods such as Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT), Complement Fixation Test (CFT), and Indirect-Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (I-ELISA) have been used to detect brucellosis. However, there is limited comparative evaluation studies and lack of molecular confirmation of the causative agents in the study areas. The study was aimed to compare RBPT, I-ELISA, CFT, and confirmation using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). A total of 2317 sera samples were collected from brucellosis-affected areas of Ethiopia with no vaccination history. All sera were subjected to comparative serological assays. Post-cross tabulation, sensitivity, and specificity were determined using Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve analysis software. PCR was performed on 54 seropositive samples using genus- and species-specific primers.

RESULTS

Among the 2317 sera tested for comparative serological assays, 189 (8.16%) were positive for RBPT, 191 (8.24%) for I-ELISA, and 48 (2.07%) for CFT. Sensitivity to RBPT was 100% (95%) in shoats and 74% (95%) in cattle. Specificity on RBPT was 98.69% (95%), 99.28% (95%), 100% (95%) in sheep, goats, and cattle, respectively. CFT sensitivity was 4 (95%) in sheep, 9.65 (95%) goats, and 72 (95%) cattle. Specificity on CFT was 100% (95%) for sheep, goats, and cattle. A 223bp Brucella genus-specific and 156bp B. abortus species-specific detected. However, B. melitensis not detected.

CONCLUSION

In this study, I-ELISA was the most sensitive and specific test. RBPT detected all Brucellosis-infected sheep and goats; nevertheless, it showed false positive in sheep and goats and false negative in cattle. The presence of B. abortus in small and large ruminants was confirmed by PCR. This is the first report of B. abortus detection in small ruminant in Ethiopia. B.abortus detected in non-preferred hosts. The findings suggest further study on molecular epidemiology of Brucella species.

摘要

背景

布鲁氏菌病是一种具有经济破坏性的动物疾病,对公共卫生有影响。虎红平板凝集试验(RBPT)、补体结合试验(CFT)和间接酶联免疫吸附试验(I-ELISA)等血清学方法已被用于检测布鲁氏菌病。然而,在研究区域中,针对该疾病,仅有有限的对比评估研究和缺乏对病原体的分子确认。本研究旨在比较 RBPT、I-ELISA、CFT 和聚合酶链反应(PCR)确认方法。共采集了来自埃塞俄比亚布鲁氏菌病疫区且未进行疫苗接种的 2317 份血清样本。所有血清样本均进行了对比血清学检测。交叉制表后,使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析软件确定了灵敏度和特异性。使用属和种特异性引物对 54 份血清阳性样本进行了 PCR 检测。

结果

在对 2317 份血清样本进行对比血清学检测中,189 份(8.16%)RBPT 阳性,191 份(8.24%)I-ELISA 阳性,48 份(2.07%)CFT 阳性。在小猪中,RBPT 的灵敏度为 100%(95%),在牛中为 74%(95%)。在绵羊、山羊和牛中,RBPT 的特异性分别为 98.69%(95%)、99.28%(95%)和 100%(95%)。在绵羊中,CFT 的灵敏度为 4 例(95%),在山羊中为 9.65%(95%),在牛中为 72 例(95%)。在绵羊、山羊和牛中,CFT 的特异性均为 100%(95%)。检测到了 223bp 的布鲁氏菌属特异性和 156bp 的 B.abortus 种特异性片段。然而,B.melitensis 未被检测到。

结论

在本研究中,I-ELISA 是最敏感和最特异的检测方法。RBPT 检测到了所有感染布鲁氏菌的绵羊和山羊,但在绵羊和山羊中出现了假阳性,在牛中出现了假阴性。PCR 证实了小反刍动物和大反刍动物中存在 B.abortus。这是埃塞俄比亚首次在小反刍动物中检测到 B.abortus。B.abortus 在非首选宿主中被检测到。这些发现提示我们进一步开展布鲁氏菌种的分子流行病学研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d09d/10413706/dc4f71fa9313/12866_2023_2962_Fig2_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验