Suppr超能文献

基于布鲁氏菌 melitensis B115 的 ELISA 检测方法破解牛布鲁氏菌病血清学反应假阳性:一项现场研究。

Brucella melitensis B115-based ELISA to unravel false positive serologic reactions in bovine brucellosis: a field study.

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Str. Prov. per Casamassima Km 3, 70010, Valenzano, BA, Italy.

Department of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Vet Res. 2020 Feb 11;16(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02278-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Brucellosis is a zoonosis whose incidence is not declining worldwide despite the global effort to control the disease. Accurate and precise diagnosis is a crucial step in any prophylaxis program but single tests to unequivocally detect animals infected with Brucella spp. are currently unavailable. In Italy, serological diagnosis of bovine brucellosis is performed with two official tests: a rapid agglutination test (i.e., Rose Bengal Plate test, RBPT) and a complement fixation test (CFT) that detect antibodies directed mainly to the smooth lipopolysaccharide (S-LPS). Neither of the two tests is able to avoid the detection of false positive serological reactions (FPSRs) caused by bacteria sharing S-LPS components with Brucella spp. and responsible for the single reactors (SR) phenomenon. A B. melitensis R strain-based ELISA showed a good diagnostic performance in unravelling FP animals; however, since a limited number of animals were analyzed in that study, a large field study was conducted here to discriminate between Brucella-infected from FP animals, with the final aim of reducing the unnecessary slaughter of the latter. An ELISA based on a R strain of Brucella, i.e., Brucella melitensis B115, was employed to measure specific IgG responses in a collection of bovine sera (n = 648). Sera were obtained from 180 farms (either officially brucellosis-free or not brucellosis-free) recruited during an extended period of time (2014-2018) and were preliminarily assayed with the official tests by the Italian Reference Centers and then subjected to the ELISA.

RESULTS

Negative sera, when subjected to the ELISA, gave O.D. values below the cutoff; SR sera, i.e. RBPT positive and CFT negative, as well as double positive (DP) sera, i.e. RBPT and CFT positive, gave O.D. values that were below the cutoff. All positive sera, i.e. from Brucella-infected animals, were RBPT positive and CFT positive (ICFTU ranging from 20 to 1280) and gave ELISA O.D. values above the cutoff.

CONCLUSIONS

The B. melitensis B115-based ELISA systematically unravelled all false positive (FP) sera while confirming the diagnosis in Brucella-infected animals. Thus, the test employed in the present study may complement the official assays to avoid the costly slaughter of FP animals.

摘要

背景

布鲁氏菌病是一种人畜共患疾病,尽管全球都在努力控制该病,但该病的发病率并没有下降。准确和精确的诊断是任何预防计划的关键步骤,但目前还没有单一的测试可以明确检测到感染布鲁氏菌属的动物。在意大利,牛布鲁氏菌病的血清学诊断使用两种官方测试:快速凝集试验(即虎红平板试验,RBPT)和补体结合试验(CFT),这两种测试都能检测到主要针对光滑脂多糖(S-LPS)的抗体。这两种测试都不能避免由与布鲁氏菌属共享 S-LPS 成分且导致单反应者(SR)现象的细菌引起的假阳性血清学反应(FPSR)的检测。基于 B. melitensis R 株的 ELISA 在揭示 FP 动物方面表现出良好的诊断性能;然而,由于在该研究中只分析了有限数量的动物,因此进行了一项大型现场研究,以区分感染布鲁氏菌的动物和 FP 动物,最终目的是减少后者的不必要屠宰。本研究采用基于布鲁氏菌 R 株(即布鲁氏菌 melitensis B115)的 ELISA 来测量牛血清(n=648)中特定 IgG 反应。血清来自 180 个农场(无论是官方无布鲁氏菌病还是非官方无布鲁氏菌病),在很长一段时间(2014-2018 年)内招募,并由意大利参考中心用官方测试进行初步检测,然后进行 ELISA 检测。

结果

阴性血清在进行 ELISA 检测时,OD 值低于截止值;SR 血清,即 RBPT 阳性且 CFT 阴性,以及双阳性(DP)血清,即 RBPT 和 CFT 阳性,OD 值低于截止值。所有阳性血清,即来自感染布鲁氏菌的动物,RBPT 阳性且 CFT 阳性(ICFTU 范围为 20-1280),OD 值高于截止值。

结论

基于 B. melitensis B115 的 ELISA 系统地揭示了所有的假阳性(FP)血清,同时确认了感染布鲁氏菌动物的诊断。因此,本研究中使用的检测方法可以补充官方检测方法,以避免 FP 动物的昂贵屠宰。

相似文献

2
Serological diagnosis of bovine brucellosis using B. melitensis strain B115.
J Microbiol Methods. 2015 Dec;119:106-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
6
Performance of skin tests with allergens from B. melitensis B115 and rough B. abortus mutants for diagnosing swine brucellosis.
Vet Microbiol. 2014 Jan 10;168(1):161-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.10.024. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
7
The use of homologous antigen in the serological diagnosis of brucellosis caused by Brucella melitensis.
J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2005 Mar;52(2):75-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2005.00821.x.
8
Evaluation of serological tests for diagnosis of Brucella melitensis infection of goats.
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 May;32(5):1159-65. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.5.1159-1165.1994.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel Vertical Flow Immunoassay with Au@PtNPs for Rapid, Ultrasensitive, and On-Site Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis.
ACS Omega. 2023 Aug 3;8(32):29534-29542. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c03381. eCollection 2023 Aug 15.
2
Application of Flow Cytometry in the Diagnosis of Bovine Epidemic Disease.
Viruses. 2023 Jun 15;15(6):1378. doi: 10.3390/v15061378.
3
False Positives in Brucellosis Serology: Wrong Bait and Wrong Pond?
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2023 May 12;8(5):274. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed8050274.
5
Bovine brucellosis - a comprehensive review.
Vet Q. 2021 Jan 1;41(1):61-88. doi: 10.1080/01652176.2020.1868616.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review of current immunological tests for the diagnosis of cattle brucellosis.
Prev Vet Med. 2018 Mar 1;151:57-72. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
2
A review of the basis of the immunological diagnosis of ruminant brucellosis.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2016 Mar;171:81-102. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
3
Serological diagnosis of bovine brucellosis using B. melitensis strain B115.
J Microbiol Methods. 2015 Dec;119:106-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
5
Brucellosis at the animal/ecosystem/human interface at the beginning of the 21st century.
Prev Vet Med. 2011 Nov 1;102(2):118-31. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.04.007. Epub 2011 May 14.
7
Brucellosis: a re-emerging zoonosis.
Vet Microbiol. 2010 Jan 27;140(3-4):392-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.021. Epub 2009 Jun 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验