• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家数字战略和创新的电子健康政策与老年人尊严相关:三个斯堪的纳维亚国家的文件分析。

National digital strategies and innovative eHealth policies concerning older adults' dignity: a document analysis in three Scandinavian countries.

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.

Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Levanger, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 10;23(1):848. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09867-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-023-09867-w
PMID:37563599
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10416358/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Scandinavian countries are internationally recognised for leading the way in older adult care and in digitally transforming healthcare. Dignity has become a central value in care for older adults in all three Scandinavian countries. Investigating documents about digitalisation in these countries can offer insights into how the dignity of older adults is impacted by digitally transforming healthcare. This study aims to provide knowledge about digital strategies and eHealth policies concerning older adults' dignity in three Scandinavian countries: Norway, Sweden and Denmark.

METHODS

National-level documents by the Norwegian Directorate of eHealth, the Norwegian Directorate of Health, the Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs and the Danish Ministry of Health concerning older adults were used as data sources. In addition, a systematic search of databases, informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute framework for systematic reviews of text and opinion papers, was undertaken to find relevant papers. All extracts concerning national digital strategies or innovative eHealth policies were deductively coded. Thereafter, extracts concerning older adults were inductively coded using a thematic analytic approach.

RESULTS

A total of 26 sources satisfied the inclusion criteria, 14 governmental papers and 12 other papers. The three countries' national digital strategies focused on access to digital technologies and continuous learning for digital skills. The included papers describing national eHealth policies underlined the importance of placing the patient at the centre of healthcare and how digital systems can increase feelings of safety. Both types of documents concerned access to data, digital device security and the human dimension of care.

CONCLUSION

The findings present evidence on Scandinavian countries' national digital strategies and innovative eHealth policies concerning older adults' dignity. The documents describe a lack of digital competence among older adults, resulting disengagement may put their well-being and human dignity at risk. Findings also underline the importance of security and at the same time the human dimension of care: Use of new digital systems must be meaningfully integrated into digital strategies and eHealth policies. All three Scandinavian countries strategies and policies underline the importance of equal access to healthcare services, as thus they promote a stance of dignified care.

摘要

背景

斯堪的纳维亚国家在老年人护理和医疗保健数字化转型方面处于国际领先地位。尊严已成为这三个斯堪的纳维亚国家所有老年人护理的核心价值观。研究这些国家的数字化转型相关文件可以深入了解数字化转型对老年人尊严的影响。本研究旨在提供关于斯堪的纳维亚三国(挪威、瑞典和丹麦)老年人尊严的数字战略和电子健康政策的知识。

方法

本研究使用了挪威电子健康局、挪威卫生部、瑞典卫生部和丹麦卫生部的国家层面的文件作为数据来源,这些文件涉及老年人的数字战略和电子健康政策。此外,还根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)系统评价文本和观点论文的框架,对数据库进行了系统搜索,以寻找相关论文。所有关于国家数字战略或创新电子健康政策的摘录均采用演绎编码。然后,采用主题分析方法对涉及老年人的摘录进行归纳编码。

结果

共有 26 份来源符合纳入标准,包括 14 份政府文件和 12 份其他文件。这三个国家的国家数字战略侧重于获取数字技术和不断学习数字技能。所包括的描述国家电子健康政策的文件强调了将患者置于医疗保健中心的重要性,以及数字系统如何增加安全感。这两种类型的文件都涉及到数据访问、数字设备安全和护理的人文关怀。

结论

研究结果提供了斯堪的纳维亚国家有关老年人尊严的国家数字战略和创新电子健康政策的证据。这些文件描述了老年人缺乏数字能力,这可能导致他们脱离社会,从而危及他们的福祉和人的尊严。研究结果还强调了安全和护理的人文关怀的重要性:新的数字系统的使用必须有意义地融入数字战略和电子健康政策中。这三个斯堪的纳维亚国家的战略和政策都强调了平等获得医疗服务的重要性,因此,它们倡导了一种有尊严的护理方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8af1/10416358/77acada33193/12913_2023_9867_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8af1/10416358/77acada33193/12913_2023_9867_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8af1/10416358/77acada33193/12913_2023_9867_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
National digital strategies and innovative eHealth policies concerning older adults' dignity: a document analysis in three Scandinavian countries.国家数字战略和创新的电子健康政策与老年人尊严相关:三个斯堪的纳维亚国家的文件分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 10;23(1):848. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09867-w.
2
Well-being and dignity in innovative digitally-led healthcare for aged adults.创新数字化引领的老年人医疗保健中的幸福感和尊严。
Nurs Philos. 2024 Apr;25(2):e12479. doi: 10.1111/nup.12479.
3
Older adults` sense of dignity in digitally led healthcare.老年人在数字化引领的医疗保健中的尊严感。
Nurs Ethics. 2022 Sep;29(6):1518-1529. doi: 10.1177/09697330221095140. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
4
Learning and Use of eHealth Among Older Adults Living at Home in Rural and Nonrural Settings: Systematic Review.老年人在农村和非农村家庭环境中学习和使用电子健康的情况:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 2;23(12):e23804. doi: 10.2196/23804.
5
Experiences of community-dwelling older adults with the use of telecare in home care services: a qualitative systematic review.社区居家老年人在家居护理服务中使用远程护理的体验:一项质性系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Dec;15(12):2913-2980. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003345.
6
Healthcare professionals' experiences of eHealth in palliative care for older people: challenges, compromises and the price of dignity.医护人员在老年人姑息治疗中使用电子医疗保健的体验:挑战、妥协和尊严的代价。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024 Dec;19(1):2374733. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2374733. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
7
Development and psychometric validation of the hospitalized older adults' dignity scale for measuring dignity during acute hospitalization.住院老年患者尊严量表的编制及在急性住院期间测量尊严的心理测量学验证。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Oct;79(10):4058-4073. doi: 10.1111/jan.15714. Epub 2023 May 24.
8
Sixteen years of eHealth experiences in Iran: a qualitative content analysis of national policies.十六年来伊朗的电子健康经验:国家政策的定性内容分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Dec 11;19(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00795-x.
9
Unlocking the eHealth professionals' career pathways: A case of Gulf Cooperation Council countries.解锁电子健康专业人员的职业发展路径:以海湾合作委员会国家为例。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Feb;170:104914. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104914. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
10
Perspectives and Experiences on eHealth Solutions for Coping With Chronic Pain: Qualitative Study Among Older People Living With Chronic Pain.关于应对慢性疼痛的电子健康解决方案的观点和经验:慢性疼痛老年人定性研究。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Sep 5;7:e57196. doi: 10.2196/57196.

引用本文的文献

1
A Call to Action: Arming Nurses With Political Knowledge to Advocate for Older People.行动呼吁:让护士掌握政治知识以倡导老年人权益
Int J Older People Nurs. 2025 Jul;20(4):e70040. doi: 10.1111/opn.70040.
2
Framing Facets of Social Participation: Older Adults' Experiences of "Social Online Meetings".构建社会参与的多面视角:老年人的“在线社交会议”体验
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2025 Jul;45(3):485-493. doi: 10.1177/15394492241262291. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
3
Rewiring care delivery through Digital Therapeutics (DTx): a machine learning-enhanced assessment and development (M-LEAD) framework.

本文引用的文献

1
Older adults` sense of dignity in digitally led healthcare.老年人在数字化引领的医疗保健中的尊严感。
Nurs Ethics. 2022 Sep;29(6):1518-1529. doi: 10.1177/09697330221095140. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
2
Telehealth and digital developments in society that persons 75 years and older in European countries have been part of: a scoping review.Telehealth 和社会数字化发展:欧洲 75 岁及以上人群的参与情况:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 26;21(1):1157. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07154-0.
3
The meaning of dignity for older adults: A meta-synthesis.
通过数字治疗(DTx)重新设计医疗服务提供:一个机器学习增强评估和开发(M-LEAD)框架。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 23;24(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10702-z.
老年人尊严的意义:元分析。
Nurs Ethics. 2021 Sep;28(6):878-894. doi: 10.1177/0969733020928134. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
4
The death of dignity is greatly exaggerated: Reflections 15 years after the declaration of dignity as a useless concept.尊严的死亡被大大夸大了:宣布尊严是一个无用的概念 15 年后的反思。
Bioethics. 2020 Jul;34(6):602-611. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12752. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
5
Quality of Life Framework for Personalised Ageing: A Systematic Review of ICT Solutions.个性化老龄化生活质量框架:信息通信技术解决方案的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 24;17(8):2940. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082940.
6
Patients' access to health records.患者获取健康记录的途径。
BMJ. 2019 Oct 2;367:l5725. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5725.
7
Acceptance of mHealth Apps for Self-Management Among People with Hypertension.高血压患者对用于自我管理的移动健康应用程序的接受度。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Sep 3;267:282-288. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190839.
8
Acceptance and Use of Innovative Assistive Technologies among People with Cognitive Impairment and Their Caregivers: A Systematic Review.认知障碍患者及其照护者对创新型辅助技术的接受和使用:系统评价。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Mar 6;2019:9196729. doi: 10.1155/2019/9196729. eCollection 2019.
9
Physical Activity Surveillance Through Smartphone Apps and Wearable Trackers: Examining the UK Potential for Nationally Representative Sampling.通过智能手机应用程序和可穿戴追踪器进行身体活动监测:研究英国全国代表性抽样的潜力。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 29;7(1):e11898. doi: 10.2196/11898.
10
Lost in digitalization? Municipality employment of welfare technologies.迷失在数字化中?市政当局对福利技术的应用。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Aug;14(6):635-642. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1496362. Epub 2018 Sep 28.