• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知障碍患者及其照护者对创新型辅助技术的接受和使用:系统评价。

Acceptance and Use of Innovative Assistive Technologies among People with Cognitive Impairment and Their Caregivers: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, Prosthetics and Orthotics, Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo 0130, Norway.

Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund 221 00, Sweden.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2019 Mar 6;2019:9196729. doi: 10.1155/2019/9196729. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1155/2019/9196729
PMID:30956989
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6431399/
Abstract

Cognitive impairments (CI), associated with the consequences of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, are increasingly prevalent among older adults, leading to deterioration in self-care, mobility, and interpersonal relationships among them. Innovative Assistive Technologies (IAT) such as electronic reminders and surveillance systems are considered as increasingly important tools to facilitate independence among this population and their caregivers. The aim of this study is to synthesise knowledge on facilitators and barriers related to acceptance of and use of IAT among people with CI and their caregivers. This systematic review includes original papers with quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods design. Relevant peer-reviewed articles published in English between 2007 and 2017 were retrieved in the following databases: CINAHL; PubMed; Inspec; and PsycINFO. The Mixed Method Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used for quality assessment. We retrieved thirty studies, including in total 1655 participants from Europe, USA/Canada, Australia, and Asia, enrolled in their homes, care-residences, day-care centres, or Living Labs. Two-thirds of the studies tested technologies integrating home sensors and wearable devices for care and monitoring CI symptoms. Main facilitators for acceptance and adherence to IAT were familiarity with and motivation to use technologies, immediate perception of effectiveness (e.g., increase in safety perceptions), and low technical demands. Barriers identified included older age, low maturity of the IAT, little experience with technologies in general, lack of personalization, and support. More than 2/3 of the studies met 80% of the quality criteria of the MMAT. Low acceptance and use of IAT both independently and with caregivers remains a significant concern. More knowledge on facilitators and barriers to use of IAT among clients of health care and social services is crucial for the successful implementation of innovative programmes aiming to leverage innovative technologies for the independence of older people with CI.

摘要

认知障碍(CI)与阿尔茨海默病和其他痴呆症的后果相关,在老年人中越来越普遍,导致他们的自我护理、行动能力和人际关系恶化。创新的辅助技术(IAT),如电子提醒和监控系统,被认为是促进这一人群及其照顾者独立性的越来越重要的工具。本研究旨在综合知识,了解认知障碍患者及其照顾者对接受和使用 IAT 的促进因素和障碍。本系统评价包括具有定量、定性或混合方法设计的原始论文。在以下数据库中检索到 2007 年至 2017 年期间以英文发表的相关同行评议文章:CINAHL;PubMed;Inspec;和 PsycINFO。使用混合方法评估工具(MMAT)进行质量评估。我们检索了 30 项研究,共包括来自欧洲、美国/加拿大、澳大利亚和亚洲的 1655 名参与者,他们在自己的家中、护理院、日托中心或生活实验室中参与研究。三分之二的研究测试了集成家庭传感器和可穿戴设备的技术,用于护理和监测 CI 症状。接受和坚持使用 IAT 的主要促进因素包括对技术的熟悉度和使用动机、对有效性的直接感知(例如,增加安全感知)以及低技术要求。确定的障碍包括年龄较大、IAT 不够成熟、一般技术经验不足、缺乏个性化和支持。超过 2/3 的研究符合 MMAT 的 80%质量标准。IAT 的低接受度和使用率,无论是独立使用还是与照顾者一起使用,仍然是一个重大问题。更多关于医疗保健和社会服务客户使用 IAT 的促进因素和障碍的知识,对于成功实施旨在利用创新技术提高认知障碍老年人独立性的创新计划至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a7b/6431399/5e9b89e1ad17/BMRI2019-9196729.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a7b/6431399/5e9b89e1ad17/BMRI2019-9196729.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a7b/6431399/5e9b89e1ad17/BMRI2019-9196729.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Acceptance and Use of Innovative Assistive Technologies among People with Cognitive Impairment and Their Caregivers: A Systematic Review.认知障碍患者及其照护者对创新型辅助技术的接受和使用:系统评价。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Mar 6;2019:9196729. doi: 10.1155/2019/9196729. eCollection 2019.
2
[Cognitive remediation and cognitive assistive technologies in schizophrenia].[精神分裂症中的认知康复与认知辅助技术]
Encephale. 2009 Apr;35(2):160-7. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.02.010. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
3
Barriers and facilitators to health technology adoption by older adults with chronic diseases: an integrative systematic review.慢性病老年患者采用健康技术的障碍和促进因素:综合系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 16;24(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18036-5.
4
Promotors and barriers to the implementation and adoption of assistive technology and telecare for people with dementia and their caregivers: a systematic review of the literature.促进和阻碍痴呆症患者及其照护者使用辅助技术和远程护理的因素:文献系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 23;22(1):1573. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08968-2.
5
Emerging Issues of Intelligent Assistive Technology Use Among People With Dementia and Their Caregivers: A U.S. Perspective.智能辅助技术在痴呆症患者及其照护者中的使用所带来的新问题:美国视角。
Front Public Health. 2020 May 21;8:191. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00191. eCollection 2020.
6
Predicting the role of assistive technologies in the lives of people with dementia using objective care recipient factors.利用客观的受助者因素预测辅助技术在痴呆症患者生活中的作用。
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Jul 20;16:143. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0314-2.
7
8
Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: A systematic review.老年人、辅助技术与采用障碍:一项系统综述
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Oct;94:112-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
9
Assistive technologies after stroke: self-management or fending for yourself? A focus group study.脑卒中后的辅助技术:自我管理还是自力更生?一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Aug 22;13:334. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-334.
10
Facilitators and barriers to the adoption of telehealth in older adults: an integrative review.老年人采用远程医疗的促进因素和障碍:一项综合综述。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2014 Nov;32(11):523-33; quiz 534-5. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000105.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital assistive technologies for community-dwelling people with dementia: A systematic review of systematic reviews by the INTERDEM AI & assistive technology taskforce.针对社区痴呆症患者的数字辅助技术:INTERDEM人工智能与辅助技术特别工作组的系统评价的系统综述
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 3;11:20552076251362353. doi: 10.1177/20552076251362353. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Assistive Technologies for Individuals with a Disability from a Neurological Condition: A Narrative Review on the Multimodal Integration.针对患有神经系统疾病的残疾人的辅助技术:关于多模态整合的叙述性综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 1;13(13):1580. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131580.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Prompting Technology and Persons With Dementia: The Significance of Context and Communication.提示技术与痴呆症患者:语境和沟通的重要性。
Gerontologist. 2019 Jan 9;59(1):101-111. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny071.
2
From Intervention to Co-constitution: New Directions in Theorizing about Aging and Technology.从干预到共同构成:老龄化与技术理论的新方向。
Gerontologist. 2019 Jan 9;59(1):15-21. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny050.
3
Usability and acceptability of technology for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic literature review.
Technology Assistance in Dementia (Tech-AiD): A Framework for Care in the Digital Age.
痴呆症的技术援助(Tech-AiD):数字时代的护理框架。
J Health Serv Psychol. 2024 Feb;50(1):37-46. doi: 10.1007/s42843-024-00101-7. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
4
"In the spectrum of people who are healthy": Views of individuals at risk of dementia on using neurotechnology for cognitive enhancement.“在健康人群范围内”:有患痴呆症风险的个体对使用神经技术进行认知增强的看法。
Neuroethics. 2024 Jul;17(2). doi: 10.1007/s12152-024-09557-2. Epub 2024 May 8.
5
Building trust in long-term care settings using assistive technology: a systematic review.利用辅助技术在长期护理环境中建立信任:一项系统综述。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Nov 22;5:1492104. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1492104. eCollection 2024.
6
The Uses and Experiences of Synchronous Communication Technology for Home-Dwelling Older Adults in a Home Care Services Context: Qualitative Systematic Review.居家老年人在居家养老服务情境中使用同步通信技术的情况和体验:定性系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 22;26:e59285. doi: 10.2196/59285.
7
Towards contextualized complex systems approaches to scaling-up hepatitis B birth-dose vaccination in the African region: a qualitative systematic review.面向非洲地区扩大乙型肝炎出生剂量疫苗接种的情境化复杂系统方法:定性系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 24;12:1389633. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1389633. eCollection 2024.
8
An IoT-based cognitive impairment detection device: A newly proposed method in older adults care-choice reaction time-device development and data-driven validation.一种基于物联网的认知障碍检测设备:老年人护理选择反应时间设备开发与数据驱动验证中的新方法。
Digit Health. 2024 Nov 3;10:20552076241293597. doi: 10.1177/20552076241293597. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
9
Technological interventions in European dementia care: a systematic review of acceptance and attitudes among people living with dementia, caregivers, and healthcare workers.欧洲痴呆症护理中的技术干预措施:对痴呆症患者、护理人员和医护人员的接受度及态度的系统评价
Front Neurol. 2024 Oct 2;15:1474336. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1474336. eCollection 2024.
10
Acceptance of physical activity virtual reality games by residents of long-term care facilities: A qualitative study.长期护理机构居民对身体活动虚拟现实游戏的接受度:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 25;19(6):e0305865. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305865. eCollection 2024.
社区居住的轻度认知障碍和痴呆老年人使用技术的可用性和可接受性:系统文献回顾。
Clin Interv Aging. 2018 May 4;13:863-886. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S154717. eCollection 2018.
4
Analysing the role of complexity in explaining the fortunes of technology programmes: empirical application of the NASSS framework.分析复杂性在解释技术项目成败中的作用:NASSS 框架的实证应用。
BMC Med. 2018 May 14;16(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1050-6.
5
The impact of nurse and care staff education on the functional ability and quality of life of people living with dementia in aged care: A systematic review.护士和护理人员教育对老年护理中痴呆症患者的功能能力和生活质量的影响:系统评价。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Aug;67:27-45. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.04.019. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
6
The Bright Elusive Butterfly of Value in Health Technology Development Comment on "Providing Value to New Health Technology: The Early Contribution of Entrepreneurs, Investors, and Regulatory Agencies".卫生技术开发中价值的光明 elusive 蝴蝶——评“为新卫生技术提供价值:企业家、投资者和监管机构的早期贡献”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jan 1;7(1):81-85. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.65.
7
Inclusion of service robots in the daily lives of frail older users: A step-by-step definition procedure on users' requirements.将服务机器人纳入体弱老年人的日常生活:用户需求的逐步定义程序。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Jan;74:191-196. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2017.10.024. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
8
Acceptance and perceived usefulness of robots to assist with activities of daily living and healthcare tasks.接受度和对机器人在日常生活活动和医疗保健任务中的辅助作用的感知有用性。
Assist Technol. 2019;31(3):133-140. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2017.1396565. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
9
Pre-admission functional decline in hospitalized persons with dementia: The influence of family caregiver factors.住院痴呆患者入院前功能衰退:家庭照料者因素的影响。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Jan;74:49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
10
The association between cognitive fluctuations and activities of daily living and quality of life among institutionalized patients with dementia.认知波动与机构化痴呆患者日常生活活动及生活质量之间的关联。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;33(2):e280-e285. doi: 10.1002/gps.4788. Epub 2017 Sep 22.