• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不让任何一个人掉队:对“2020年新增1.2亿用户”目标的追求是否使一些女性被落下了?

No one left behind: has the pursuit of FP2020's 120 million additional users goal left some women behind?

作者信息

Farid Shiza, Bremner Jason, Anderson Emma

机构信息

FP2020, Washington, DC, 20006, USA.

出版信息

Gates Open Res. 2022 Jan 28;5:114. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13339.2. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.12688/gatesopenres.13339.2
PMID:37564099
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10409982/
Abstract

An important question is whether the FP2020's "120 million additional users" goal exacerbated inequities and led to a prioritization of populations within countries where substantial gains towards the goal could be made. We examine FP2020 country data for signs of inequity in gains in modern contraceptive prevalence (MCP). We selected 11 countries (Bangladesh, Burundi, Ethiopia, Haiti, Malawi, Mali, Nepal, Pakistan, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Uganda, and Zimbabwe) to conduct a bivariate analysis. We evaluated if MCP growth had been equitable by assessing MCP between two surveys stratified by residence, levels of education, age groups, marital status, and wealth. In most countries, MCP increased among rural women and in seven African countries these gains were significant. In six countries, MCP gains were significant both among women with no education and in the lowest wealth group. MCP gains among young women aged 15-19 and 20-24 were seen in four African countries: Malawi, Senegal, Sierra Leone, and Uganda. Our findings suggest that between two surveys since 2010 many countries saw MCP gains across different dimensions of equity and do not suggest a focus on expanded coverage at the expense of equity. As the family planning community begins to look ahead to the next partnership, this analysis can help inform the emerging FP2030 framework, which includes equity as a guiding principle.

摘要

一个重要问题是,“2020年计划生育”的“新增1.2亿用户”目标是否加剧了不平等现象,并导致在各国国内优先考虑那些有望在实现该目标方面取得显著进展的人群。我们研究了“2020年计划生育”国家数据中现代避孕普及率(MCP)增长方面不平等的迹象。我们选择了11个国家(孟加拉国、布隆迪、埃塞俄比亚、海地、马拉维、马里、尼泊尔、巴基斯坦、塞内加尔、塞拉利昂、乌干达和津巴布韦)进行双变量分析。我们通过评估按居住、教育水平、年龄组、婚姻状况和财富分层的两次调查之间的MCP,来评估MCP增长是否公平。在大多数国家,农村妇女的MCP有所增加,在七个非洲国家,这些增长非常显著。在六个国家,未受过教育的妇女和最贫困财富组的妇女的MCP增长都很显著。在四个非洲国家(马拉维、塞内加尔、塞拉利昂和乌干达),15 - 19岁和20 - 24岁年轻女性的MCP有所增长。我们的研究结果表明,自2010年以来的两次调查期间,许多国家在不同公平维度上都实现了MCP增长,并未显示出以牺牲公平为代价来扩大覆盖范围的情况。随着计划生育界开始展望下一个伙伴关系,这一分析可为新出现的“2030年计划生育”框架提供参考,该框架将公平作为一项指导原则。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fadb/10409983/94a59f77c595/gatesopenres-5-14777-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fadb/10409983/42ee45e9b4fd/gatesopenres-5-14777-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fadb/10409983/2e77664e9531/gatesopenres-5-14777-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fadb/10409983/1623cacd3b80/gatesopenres-5-14777-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fadb/10409983/94a59f77c595/gatesopenres-5-14777-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fadb/10409983/42ee45e9b4fd/gatesopenres-5-14777-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fadb/10409983/2e77664e9531/gatesopenres-5-14777-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fadb/10409983/1623cacd3b80/gatesopenres-5-14777-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fadb/10409983/94a59f77c595/gatesopenres-5-14777-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
No one left behind: has the pursuit of FP2020's 120 million additional users goal left some women behind?不让任何一个人掉队:对“2020年新增1.2亿用户”目标的追求是否使一些女性被落下了?
Gates Open Res. 2022 Jan 28;5:114. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13339.2. eCollection 2021.
2
Modern contraceptive use, unmet need, and demand satisfied among women of reproductive age who are married or in a union in the focus countries of the Family Planning 2020 initiative: a systematic analysis using the Family Planning Estimation Tool.计划生育 2020 倡议重点国家中已婚或处于伴侣关系的育龄妇女的现代避孕措施使用、未满足的避孕需求和需求得到满足情况:利用计划生育估计工具进行的系统分析。
Lancet. 2018 Mar 3;391(10123):870-882. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33104-5. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
3
Use of family planning and child health services in the private sector: an equity analysis of 12 DHS surveys.私营部门计划生育和儿童保健服务的利用:对 12 次 DHS 调查的公平性分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Apr 24;17(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0763-7.
4
Trends in contraceptive prevalence rates in sub-Saharan Africa since the 2012 London Summit on Family Planning: results from repeated cross-sectional surveys.撒哈拉以南非洲地区自 2012 年计划生育问题伦敦峰会以来的避孕普及率趋势:来自重复横断面调查的结果。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jul;7(7):e904-e911. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30200-1. Epub 2019 May 17.
5
Inequity in the face of success: understanding geographic and wealth-based equity in success of facility-based delivery for under-5 mortality reduction in six countries.面对成功的不平等:理解六个国家在降低 5 岁以下儿童死亡率方面基于地理位置和财富的医疗机构分娩成功率的公平性。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Feb 28;23(Suppl 1):651. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04387-2.
6
Patterns and determinants of antenatal care utilization: analysis of national survey data in seven countdown countries.产前保健利用的模式与决定因素:对七个倒计时国家全国调查数据的分析
J Glob Health. 2016 Jun;6(1):010404. doi: 10.7189/jogh.06.010404.
7
Wealth-based inequality in the continuum of maternal health service utilisation in 16 sub-Saharan African countries.16 个撒哈拉以南非洲国家孕产妇卫生服务利用连续体中的基于财富的不平等。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Oct 2;22(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-02015-0.
8
Trends and inequalities in modern contraceptive use among women in Sierra Leone, 2008-2019.2008-2019 年塞拉利昂妇女现代避孕方法使用的趋势和不平等。
Reprod Health. 2024 Nov 19;21(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01900-3.
9
Access to skilled attendant at birth and the coverage of the third dose of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine across 14 West African countries - an equity analysis.14 个西非国家中熟练接生员的可及性和白喉-破伤风-百日咳三联疫苗第三剂的覆盖率 - 公平性分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Jun 1;19(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01204-5.
10
Capitalising on shared goals for family planning: a concordance assessment of two global initiatives using longitudinal statistical models.利用计划生育的共同目标:使用纵向统计模型对两项全球倡议进行一致性评估。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 12;9(11):e031425. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031425.

本文引用的文献

1
Incorporating Method Dissatisfaction into Unmet Need for Contraception: Implications for Measurement and Impact.将方法不满纳入避孕未满足需求:对测量和影响的启示。
Stud Fam Plann. 2021 Mar;52(1):95-102. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12146. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
2
Analyses of inequalities in RMNCH: rising to the challenge of the SDGs.妇幼保健与儿童健康领域不平等现象分析:应对可持续发展目标的挑战
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jun 24;4(Suppl 4):e001295. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001295. eCollection 2019.
3
Toward a New Definition of Unmet Need for Contraception.
走向避孕未满足需求的新定义。
Stud Fam Plann. 2019 Jun;50(2):195-198. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12084. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
4
Monitoring Progress in Equality for the Sustainable Development Goals: A Case Study of Meeting Demand for Family Planning.监测可持续发展目标平等进展情况:以满足计划生育需求为例
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2018 Jun 29;6(2):390-401. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00012. Print 2018 Jun 27.
5
Improved Reproductive Health Equity Between the Poor and the Rich: An Analysis of Trends in 46 Low- and Middle-Income Countries.改善穷人和富人之间的生殖健康公平性:46 个中低收入国家趋势分析。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2015 Sep 7;3(3):419-45. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00124.
6
Did Equity of Reproductive and Maternal Health Service Coverage Increase during the MDG Era? An Analysis of Trends and Determinants across 74 Low- and Middle-Income Countries.千年发展目标时代生殖与孕产妇健康服务覆盖的公平性有所提升吗?对74个低收入和中等收入国家的趋势及决定因素的分析。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 2;10(9):e0134905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134905. eCollection 2015.
7
Achieving the goal of the London Summit on Family Planning by adhering to voluntary, rights-based family planning: what can we learn from past experiences with coercion?通过坚持自愿、基于权利的计划生育来实现伦敦计划生育峰会的目标:我们可以从过去的强制经验中学到什么?
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014 Dec;40(4):206-14. doi: 10.1363/4020614.
8
Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health.从公平视角看待干预措施:使用 PROGRESS 确保考虑到社会分层因素,以揭示健康方面的不平等现象。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jan;67(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
9
Equity analysis: identifying who benefits from family planning programs.公平性分析:确定计划生育项目的受益者。
Stud Fam Plann. 2010 Jun;41(2):101-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2010.00230.x.
10
10 best resources on... health equity.关于健康公平性的10大最佳资源。
Health Policy Plan. 2007 Sep;22(5):348-51. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czm028.