Wußing Moritz, Grabner Roland H, Sommer Hannah, Saalbach Henrik
Faculty of Education, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 26;14:1198117. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1198117. eCollection 2023.
Language-switching costs arise when learners encode information in one language and subsequently recall that information in a different language. The assumed cognitive mechanism behind these costs is the principle of encoding specificity that implies language-dependent representations of information. The aim of our study was to test this mechanism and to gain insights into the impact of language-switching on subsequent learning. To this end, we used retrieval-based learning as a carrier-paradigm. In a 2×3-design, 117 participants learned mathematical concepts with a practice-test or a restudy opportunity (within-subjects factor). In addition, the sample was divided into three groups regarding language-switching (between-subjects factor): one group without switching, one switched for the final tests, and one switched between initial learning and subsequent learning. Results show the expected main effects: participants performed better for the items learned via retrieval-based learning (testing-effect) and worse in conditions with language-switching (language-switching-costs). Most importantly, we were able to find an interaction between learning condition and language-switching: retrieval-based learning suffers particularly from language-switching. Additionally, our results indicate that language switching before subsequent learning seems to be particularly detrimental. These results provide both validation for encoding specificity as mechanism underlying language-switching costs and new information on the impact of the time of language-switching that can be considered in educational designs such as "Content and Language Integrated Learning."
当学习者用一种语言编码信息,随后用另一种语言回忆该信息时,就会产生语言转换成本。这些成本背后假定的认知机制是编码特异性原则,这意味着信息的语言依赖表征。我们研究的目的是测试这一机制,并深入了解语言转换对后续学习的影响。为此,我们使用基于检索的学习作为载体范式。在一个2×3设计中,117名参与者通过练习测试或重新学习的机会来学习数学概念(组内因素)。此外,样本根据语言转换分为三组(组间因素):一组不进行转换,一组在最终测试时进行转换,一组在初始学习和后续学习之间进行转换。结果显示了预期的主效应:参与者通过基于检索的学习学习的项目表现更好(测试效应),而在语言转换的条件下表现更差(语言转换成本)。最重要的是,我们能够发现学习条件和语言转换之间的相互作用:基于检索的学习尤其受到语言转换的影响。此外,我们的结果表明,在后续学习之前进行语言转换似乎特别有害。这些结果既验证了编码特异性作为语言转换成本背后的机制,也提供了关于语言转换时间影响的新信息,这些信息可在“内容与语言整合学习”等教学设计中加以考虑。