Bakshi Satvinder Singh, Kalidoss Vinoth Kumar, Ramesh Seepana, Das Soumyajit
Department of ENT and Head & Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Mangalagiri, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Department of Community and Family Medicine, AIIMS Mangalagiri, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Aug 4;27(3):e380-e384. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771169. eCollection 2023 Jul.
Tinnitus is one of the most common otological complaints encountered. Patients often use the internet, especially YouTube videos, as a source of information regarding their health condition. There is a need to analyze the standard and quality of information in these videos so that the patients receive correct information. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the reliability and utility of YouTube videos on tinnitus. The first 100 videos on YouTube using the search terms and were identified. Three subject experts assessed the reliability using the modified five-point DISCERN score and utility using a usefulness score. Various indices like view ratio, like ratio, video power index, and interaction index were also calculated. Out of the 100 videos selected, 34 were excluded; collectively the remaining 66 videos were viewed 12,797,730 times. The most common upload sources were hospital/physician (39%), paramedic health care providers (19%), and alternative medicine (19%). The discern score was the highest in hospital/physician group (mean 19.3) and lowest in patient experience group (mean 13.4). A negative correlation was observed between the number of views (correlation coefficient -0.214), number of likes (correlation coefficient -0.242), number of comments (correlation coefficient -0.242), and the usefulness score. Although there are multiple videos on YouTube regarding tinnitus, the overall educational content and reliability of the videos are poor. Video popularity is not associated with usefulness. Healthcare providers should counsel patients regarding videos on YouTube and try to create more comprehensive videos.
耳鸣是最常见的耳科病症之一。患者常常将互联网,尤其是YouTube视频,作为获取自身健康状况信息的来源。有必要分析这些视频中的信息标准和质量,以便患者能获得正确信息。
本研究的目的是评估YouTube上关于耳鸣的视频的可靠性和实用性。
通过搜索词在YouTube上识别出了前100个视频。三位主题专家使用改良的五点DISCERN评分法评估可靠性,并使用有用性评分法评估实用性。还计算了诸如观看率、点赞率、视频影响力指数和互动指数等各种指标。
在所选的100个视频中,排除了34个;其余66个视频总共被观看了12,797,730次。最常见的上传来源是医院/医生(39%)、护理人员医疗服务提供者(19%)和替代医学(19%)。DISCERN评分在医院/医生组中最高(平均19.3),在患者经验组中最低(平均13.4)。观察到观看次数(相关系数-0.214)、点赞次数(相关系数-0.242)、评论次数(相关系数-0.242)与有用性评分之间存在负相关。
尽管YouTube上有多个关于耳鸣的视频,但这些视频的整体教育内容和可靠性较差。视频的受欢迎程度与有用性无关。医疗服务提供者应就YouTube上的视频向患者提供咨询,并尝试制作更全面的视频。