Kunze Kyle N, Cohn Matthew R, Wakefield Connor, Hamati Fadi, LaPrade Robert F, Forsythe Brian, Yanke Adam B, Chahla Jorge
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
The Steadman Clinic, Vail, Colorado, U.S.A.
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2019 Nov 27;1(2):e109-e114. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2019.09.003. eCollection 2019 Dec.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and educational content of YouTube videos concerning injuries to the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) of the knee.
The first 50 videos specific to the PCL identified through the YouTube query were evaluated by a method of video selection demonstrated to be feasible in prior YouTube studies. Videos were classified by content and upload source. Video reliability was assessed using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria (score range 0-5). Video educational content was assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) (range 0-4) and the PCL Score (PCLS) (score range 0-18). Analysis of variance was used to determine differences in video reliability and educational content quality based on video content and upload source. Multivariate linear regressions were used to identify predictors of video reliability and educational content quality.
The mean number of views per video was 50,477.9 ± 15,036. Collectively, the 50 videos were viewed 14,141,285 times. Video content was classified primarily as information about disease (62.0%). The most common upload sources were physicians (24.0%) and nonphysician health care providers (26.0%). Significant between-group interactions were found between video source and the JAMA score, with physicians and medical sources having significantly higher mean JAMA scores ( = 0.037). Videos uploaded by physicians were an independent positive predictor of greater JAMA scores (β:1.27; = 0.008). Videos uploaded by a medical source (β:2.06; = 0.038) were an independent positive predictor of a greater GQS. There were no independent associations between video content category or upload source and the PCLS.
Videos concerning the PCL were frequently viewed on YouTube, but the educational quality and reliability of these videos were low.
Physicians and health care providers treating PCL pathology should take the initiative to counsel patients about which outside resources are reliable to better inform patients about their treatment decisions. With regard to YouTube videos specifically, providers should caution their patients that this source of information may be unreliable.
本研究旨在评估YouTube上有关膝关节后交叉韧带(PCL)损伤的视频的可靠性和教育内容。
通过YouTube查询识别出的前50个特定于PCL的视频,采用一种在先前YouTube研究中已证明可行的视频选择方法进行评估。视频按内容和上传来源进行分类。使用美国医学会杂志(JAMA)基准标准(评分范围0 - 5)评估视频可靠性。使用全球质量评分(GQS)(范围0 - 4)和PCL评分(PCLS)(评分范围0 - 18)评估视频教育内容。采用方差分析确定基于视频内容和上传来源的视频可靠性和教育内容质量的差异。使用多元线性回归确定视频可靠性和教育内容质量的预测因素。
每个视频的平均观看次数为50,477.9 ± 15,036次。这50个视频总共被观看了14,141,285次。视频内容主要归类为疾病信息(62.0%)。最常见的上传来源是医生(24.0%)和非医生医疗服务提供者(26.0%)。在视频来源和JAMA评分之间发现了显著的组间交互作用,医生和医学来源的平均JAMA评分显著更高(P = 0.037)。医生上传的视频是更高JAMA评分的独立正向预测因素(β:1.27;P = 0.008)。医学来源上传的视频(β:2.06;P = 0.038)是更高GQS的独立正向预测因素。视频内容类别或上传来源与PCLS之间没有独立关联。
YouTube上有关PCL的视频观看频率较高,但这些视频的教育质量和可靠性较低。
治疗PCL病变的医生和医疗服务提供者应主动向患者提供咨询,告知哪些外部资源可靠,以便更好地为患者的治疗决策提供信息。特别是对于YouTube视频,提供者应提醒患者该信息来源可能不可靠。