Liu Hong, Luo Min, Peng Chunrong, Huang Jianmei, Wang Dengfeng, Huang Jianming, Zhang Guonan
Gynecologic Oncology Center, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Front Oncol. 2023 Jul 24;13:1103357. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1103357. eCollection 2023.
To investigate the effect of primary debulking surgery (PDS), NACT followed by interval debulking surgery (NACT-IDS), and chemotherapy alone on the prognosis of FIGO stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with different metastatic patterns.
We retrospectively analyzed 133 cases of FIGO stage IV EOC with pleural effusion (stage IVA), parenchymal metastases (stage IVB), or extra-abdominal lymph node metastases (stage IVB) at our Hospital between January 2014 and July 2021.
Among 133 cases with stage IV disease, 16.5% (n=22) presented with pleural effusion, 46.6% (n=62) with parenchymal metastases, and 36.9% (n=49) with extra-abdominal lymph node metastases. Regardless of the metastatic patterns, the 90.2% (n=120) of cases who underwent PDS/NACT-IDS exhibited a significantly superior overall survival (OS) compared to the 9.8% cases (n=13) who received chemotherapy alone (32 vs 17 months, =0.000). The cohort was further stratified into 58 cases (48.3%) with R0, 41 cases (34.2%) with R1, and 21 cases (17.5%) with R2. The median OS of cases with R0 was significantly better than that of cases with R1/R2 (74 vs 27 months, =0.000). There was no significant difference in median OS between PDS and NACT-IDS (43 vs 31 months, =0.676), as well as between FIGO IVA and IVB (35 vs 31 months, =0.582). Additionally, the metastatic patterns and the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles (≤4 or >4) did not demonstrate any prognostic significance for median OS (=0.820 and 33 vs 26 months, =0.280, respectively).
Regardless of FIGO IVA and IVB stages or metastatic patterns, patients diagnosed with stage IV EOC may benefit from cytoreductive surgery with abdominal R0, compared with chemotherapy alone.
探讨初次肿瘤细胞减灭术(PDS)、新辅助化疗(NACT)后行间隔期肿瘤细胞减灭术(NACT-IDS)以及单纯化疗对不同转移模式的国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)IV期上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)预后的影响。
我们回顾性分析了2014年1月至2021年7月期间在我院就诊的133例FIGO IV期EOC患者,这些患者伴有胸腔积液(IVA期)、实质脏器转移(IVB期)或腹外淋巴结转移(IVB期)。
在133例IV期疾病患者中,16.5%(n = 22)表现为胸腔积液,46.6%(n = 62)为实质脏器转移,36.9%(n = 49)为腹外淋巴结转移。无论转移模式如何,接受PDS/NACT-IDS的患者中有90.2%(n = 120)的总生存期(OS)显著优于单纯接受化疗的患者(9.8%,n = 13)(32个月对17个月,P = 0.000)。该队列进一步分为R0期58例(48.3%)、R1期41例(34.2%)和R2期21例(17.5%)。R0期患者的中位OS显著优于R1/R2期患者(74个月对27个月,P = 0.000)。PDS和NACT-IDS之间的中位OS无显著差异(43个月对31个月,P = 0.676),FIGO IVA期和IVB期之间也无显著差异(35个月对31个月,P = 0.582)。此外,转移模式和新辅助化疗周期数(≤4或>4)对中位OS均无预后意义(分别为P = 0.820和33个月对26个月,P = 0.280)。
无论FIGO IVA期和IVB期或转移模式如何,与单纯化疗相比,诊断为IV期EOC的患者可能从达到腹部R0的细胞减灭术中获益。