• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原发灶治疗方法是否影响高级别浆液性卵巢癌的首次复发模式?

Does the method of primary treatment affect the pattern of first recurrence in high-grade serous ovarian cancer?

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.

Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Nov;155(2):192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.08.011. Epub 2019 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.08.011
PMID:31521322
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6837278/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine if the primary treatment approach (primary debulking surgery (PDS) versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery (NACT-IDS)) influences the pattern of first recurrence in patients with completely cytoreduced advanced high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 178 patients with newly diagnosed stage IIIC-IV HGSOC, complete gross resection during PDS (n = 124) or IDS (n = 54) from January 2008-March 2013, and baseline and first recurrence contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans. Clinical characteristics and number of disease sites at baseline were analyzed for associations with time to recurrence. In 135 patients who experienced recurrence, the overlap in disease locations between baseline and recurrence and the number of new disease locations at recurrence were analyzed according to the primary treatment approach.

RESULTS

At univariate and multivariate analyses, NACT-IDS was associated with more overlapping locations between baseline and first recurrence (p ≤ 0.003) and fewer recurrences in new anatomic locations (p ≤ 0.043) compared with PDS. The same results were found in a subgroup that received intra-peritoneal adjuvant chemotherapy after either treatment approach. At univariate analysis, patient age, primary treatment approach, adjuvant chemotherapy route, and number of disease locations at baseline were associated with time to recurrence (p ≤ 0.009). At multivariate analysis, older patient age, NACT-IDS, and greater disease locations at baseline remained significant (p ≤ 0.018).

CONCLUSION

The distribution of disease at the time of first recurrence varied with the choice of primary treatment. Compared to patients treated with PDS, patients who underwent NACT-IDS experienced recurrence more often in the same locations as the original disease.

摘要

目的

确定初始治疗方法(原发性肿瘤细胞减灭术(PDS)与新辅助化疗和间隔性肿瘤细胞减灭术(NACT-IDS))是否会影响完全减瘤的晚期高级别浆液性卵巢癌(HGSOC)患者首次复发的模式。

材料和方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 178 例 2008 年 1 月至 2013 年 3 月期间新诊断为 IIIC-IV 期 HGSOC 的患者,这些患者在 PDS(n=124)或 IDS(n=54)期间实现了完全肉眼可见的肿瘤切除,且具有基线和首次复发的增强 CT 扫描。分析基线时的临床特征和疾病部位数量与复发时间之间的关系。在 135 例经历复发的患者中,根据初始治疗方法分析了基线和复发时疾病部位的重叠情况以及复发时新发病部位的数量。

结果

单因素和多因素分析显示,与 PDS 相比,NACT-IDS 与基线和首次复发时更多的重叠部位(p≤0.003)和较少的新部位复发(p≤0.043)相关。在接受两种治疗方法中的任何一种治疗后的腹膜内辅助化疗的亚组中也得到了相同的结果。在单因素分析中,患者年龄、初始治疗方法、辅助化疗途径和基线时的疾病部位数量与复发时间相关(p≤0.009)。在多因素分析中,年龄较大、NACT-IDS 和基线时疾病部位较多与复发时间相关(p≤0.018)。

结论

首次复发时疾病的分布随初始治疗方法的选择而变化。与接受 PDS 治疗的患者相比,接受 NACT-IDS 治疗的患者在与原发病灶相同的部位复发更为常见。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/856f/6837278/d1f35df8ef54/nihms-1539673-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/856f/6837278/7fa06ab1a2e7/nihms-1539673-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/856f/6837278/d1f35df8ef54/nihms-1539673-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/856f/6837278/7fa06ab1a2e7/nihms-1539673-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/856f/6837278/d1f35df8ef54/nihms-1539673-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Does the method of primary treatment affect the pattern of first recurrence in high-grade serous ovarian cancer?原发灶治疗方法是否影响高级别浆液性卵巢癌的首次复发模式?
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Nov;155(2):192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.08.011. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
2
Upfront debulking surgery versus interval debulking surgery for advanced tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma and diffuse peritoneal metastases treated with peritonectomy procedures plus HIPEC.新辅助肿瘤细胞减灭术与间隔性肿瘤细胞减灭术治疗腹膜假黏液瘤的疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec;120(7):1208-1219. doi: 10.1002/jso.25703. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
3
Patterns of Recurrence and Clinical Outcome of Patients With Stage IIIC to Stage IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in Complete Response After Primary Debulking Surgery Plus Chemotherapy or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Interval Debulking Surgery: An Italian Multicenter Retrospective Study.IIIC期至IV期上皮性卵巢癌患者在初次肿瘤细胞减灭术加化疗或新辅助化疗后行中间型肿瘤细胞减灭术达到完全缓解后的复发模式及临床结局:一项意大利多中心回顾性研究
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 Jan;27(1):28-36. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000843.
4
Primary debulking surgery versus primary neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high grade advanced stage ovarian cancer: comparison of survivals.高级别晚期卵巢癌的初次肿瘤细胞减灭术与初次新辅助化疗:生存比较。
Radiol Oncol. 2018 Sep 11;52(3):307-319. doi: 10.2478/raon-2018-0030.
5
Outcome of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Time for Strategy Trials to Resolve the Problem of Optimal Timing of Surgery.上皮性卵巢癌的治疗结果:开展策略性试验以解决手术最佳时机问题的时候了。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Jul;25(6):993-9. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000461.
6
Timing and pattern of recurrence in ovarian cancer patients with high tumor dissemination treated with primary debulking surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy.接受初次肿瘤细胞减灭术与新辅助化疗治疗的高肿瘤播散的卵巢癌患者的复发时间和模式。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Nov;20(12):3955-60. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3091-6. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
7
Study of upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with stage IIIC and IV ovarian cancer, SGOG SUNNY (SOC-2) trial concept.前瞻性手术与新辅助化疗后间隔减瘤手术治疗 IIIC 期和 IV 期卵巢癌患者的研究,SGOG SUNNY(SOC-2)试验方案。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Sep;31(5):e86. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e86.
8
Optimizing the treatment of ovarian cancer: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking versus primary debulking surgery for epithelial ovarian cancers likely to have suboptimal resection.优化卵巢癌治疗:新辅助化疗和间隔肿瘤缩小术与初始肿瘤细胞减灭术治疗可能无法实现理想切除的上皮性卵巢癌。
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Feb;144(2):266-273. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.021. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
9
Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on platinum resistance in stage IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian cancer.新辅助化疗对IIIC期和IV期上皮性卵巢癌铂耐药性的影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Sep;95(36):e4797. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004797.
10
Multiple Cycles of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Associated With Poor Survival in Bulky Stage IIIC and IV Ovarian Cancer.多周期新辅助化疗与晚期IIIC期和IV期卵巢癌患者的不良生存相关。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Oct;25(8):1398-404. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000517.

引用本文的文献

1
mpMRI-based habitat analysis for predicting prognoses in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer: a multicenter study.基于多参数磁共振成像的栖息地分析预测高级别浆液性卵巢癌患者的预后:一项多中心研究
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 May 29. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05004-9.
2
Evolving landscape of detection and targeting miRNA/epigenetics for therapeutic strategies in ovarian cancer.卵巢癌治疗策略中用于检测和靶向微小RNA/表观遗传学的不断演变的格局。
Cancer Lett. 2024 Nov 29;611:217357. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.217357.
3
Clinical value of serum tumor markers in assessing the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: single-center prospective clinical study.

本文引用的文献

1
Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018.卵巢癌统计数据,2018 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jul;68(4):284-296. doi: 10.3322/caac.21456. Epub 2018 May 29.
2
High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: Associations between BRCA Mutation Status, CT Imaging Phenotypes, and Clinical Outcomes.高级别浆液性卵巢癌:BRCA突变状态、CT成像表型与临床结局之间的关联
Radiology. 2017 Nov;285(2):472-481. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161697. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
3
Optimal primary management of bulky stage IIIC ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal carcinoma: Are the only options complete gross resection at primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy?
血清肿瘤标志物在评估晚期卵巢癌新辅助化疗疗效中的临床价值:单中心前瞻性临床研究
Front Oncol. 2024 May 28;14:1399502. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1399502. eCollection 2024.
4
A retrospective analysis for investigating the relationship between FIGO stage IVA/IVB and cytoreductive surgery with prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer.一项关于探究国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)IV A/IV B期与上皮性卵巢癌肿瘤细胞减灭术及预后之间关系的回顾性分析。
Front Oncol. 2023 Jul 24;13:1103357. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1103357. eCollection 2023.
5
Pigment epithelium-derived factor promotes peritoneal dissemination of ovarian cancer through induction of immunosuppressive macrophages.色素上皮衍生因子通过诱导免疫抑制性巨噬细胞促进卵巢癌的腹膜扩散。
Commun Biol. 2022 Sep 2;5(1):904. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03837-4.
6
Into the future: A pilot study combining imaging with molecular profiling to predict resectability in ovarian cancer.展望未来:一项结合影像学与分子分析预测卵巢癌可切除性的初步研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Sep;166(3):508-514. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.07.020. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
7
Expressions and clinical significances of STAT3 and Grim19 in epithelial ovarian cancer.信号转导和转录激活因子3(STAT3)及Grim19在卵巢上皮性癌中的表达及临床意义
3 Biotech. 2020 Jun;10(6):246. doi: 10.1007/s13205-020-02237-x. Epub 2020 May 11.
晚期IIIC期卵巢癌、输卵管癌和腹膜癌的最佳初始治疗:在初次肿瘤细胞减灭术中进行完全肉眼切除或新辅助化疗是仅有的选择吗?
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Apr;145(1):15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.02.023. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
4
Patterns of Recurrence and Clinical Outcome of Patients With Stage IIIC to Stage IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in Complete Response After Primary Debulking Surgery Plus Chemotherapy or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Interval Debulking Surgery: An Italian Multicenter Retrospective Study.IIIC期至IV期上皮性卵巢癌患者在初次肿瘤细胞减灭术加化疗或新辅助化疗后行中间型肿瘤细胞减灭术达到完全缓解后的复发模式及临床结局:一项意大利多中心回顾性研究
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 Jan;27(1):28-36. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000843.
5
Primary Surgery or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: The Debate Continues….晚期卵巢癌的初次手术或新辅助化疗:争论仍在继续……
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:153-62. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_160624.
6
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and primary debulking surgery utilization for advanced-stage ovarian cancer at a comprehensive cancer center.综合性癌症中心晚期卵巢癌新辅助化疗及初次肿瘤细胞减灭术的应用情况
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Mar;140(3):436-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Jan 9.
7
What Should We Expect After a Complete Cytoreduction at the Time of Interval or Primary Debulking Surgery in Advanced Ovarian Cancer?在晚期卵巢癌的间隔期或初次肿瘤细胞减灭术中进行完全肿瘤细胞减灭术后,我们应期待什么?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 May;23(5):1666-73. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-5051-9. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
8
Role of aggressive surgical cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer.积极的手术细胞减灭术在晚期卵巢癌中的作用。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Oct;26(4):336-42. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2015.26.4.336. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
9
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Interval Debulking Surgery and the Risk of Platinum Resistance in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.新辅助化疗后行间歇性肿瘤细胞减灭术与上皮性卵巢癌铂耐药风险
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22 Suppl 3:S971-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4623-z. Epub 2015 May 27.
10
Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.新诊断的晚期卵巢癌的初次化疗与初次手术(CHORUS):一项开放标签、随机、对照、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2015 Jul 18;386(9990):249-57. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62223-6. Epub 2015 May 19.