Suppr超能文献

来自执业护士实践的电子病历可用性研究:一项采用出声思考技术的定性研究。

Usability Study of an Electronic Medical Record From the Nurse Practitioners' Practice: A Qualitative Study Using the Think-Aloud Technique.

作者信息

Alshehri Afnan Ali, Alanazi Abdullah

机构信息

College of Public Health and Health Informatics, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, SAU.

Research, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, SAU.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Jul 9;15(7):e41603. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41603. eCollection 2023 Jul.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Ensuring the usability of electronic medical records (EMRs) is crucial for healthcare providers to offer efficient, effective, and safe patient care. Nurse practitioners (NPs) are integral to the healthcare system and are essential in managing patient workflows. However, few studies assess NPs' perspectives on how EMR usage affects workflow and patient care quality.

METHOD

In this study, the "think-aloud technique" was utilized for usability testing. It involves observing users (NPs) as they complete their everyday tasks on the EMR while vocalizing their thoughts and emotions. This method has been proven reliable and valid through various research, such as a systematic review.

RESULTS

The EMR system used by NPs can create a heavy cognitive workload, have limited functionality, can lead to unintended errors, and may experience technical difficulties.

CONCLUSION

The EMR system used by NPs is challenging due to three main issues: high cognitive workload, limited system functionality, and technical problems. To improve the system, it is recommended to reduce the cognitive burden by customizing the user interface to fit the NPs' needs, enhancing the system's functionality by adding essential features and fixing any technical issues.

摘要

引言

确保电子病历(EMR)的可用性对于医疗保健提供者提供高效、有效和安全的患者护理至关重要。执业护士(NP)是医疗保健系统不可或缺的一部分,在管理患者工作流程中起着至关重要的作用。然而,很少有研究评估执业护士对电子病历使用如何影响工作流程和患者护理质量的看法。

方法

在本研究中,采用“出声思维技术”进行可用性测试。该方法包括观察用户(执业护士)在电子病历上完成日常任务时说出他们的想法和感受。通过各种研究,如系统评价,已证明该方法可靠且有效。

结果

执业护士使用的电子病历系统可能会造成沉重的认知负担,功能有限,可能导致意外错误,并且可能会遇到技术困难。

结论

由于三个主要问题,执业护士使用的电子病历系统具有挑战性:认知负担重、系统功能有限和技术问题。为了改进该系统,建议通过定制用户界面以满足执业护士的需求来减轻认知负担,通过添加基本功能和解决任何技术问题来增强系统功能。

相似文献

4
Medical and nursing clinician perspectives on the usability of the hospital electronic medical record: A qualitative analysis.
Health Inf Manag. 2024 Sep;53(3):189-197. doi: 10.1177/18333583231154624. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
5
Usability and Safety in Electronic Medical Records Interface Design: A Review of Recent Literature and Guideline Formulation.
Hum Factors. 2015 Aug;57(5):805-34. doi: 10.1177/0018720815576827. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
7
Integrating usability testing and think-aloud protocol analysis with "near-live" clinical simulations in evaluating clinical decision support.
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Nov;81(11):761-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.02.009. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
9
10
Electronic Record Adoption and Use among Nurse Practitioners in British Columbia.
Can J Nurs Res. 2014 Mar;46(1):44-65. doi: 10.1177/084456211404600105.

引用本文的文献

1
Electronic maternal and child health application usability, feasibility and acceptability among healthcare providers in Amhara region, Ethiopia.
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 May 13;3(5):e0000494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000494. eCollection 2024 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Combining structured and unstructured data in EMRs to create clinically-defined EMR-derived cohorts.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Mar 8;21(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01441-w.
2
Recent Advancement of Clinical Information Systems: Opportunities and Challenges.
Yearb Med Inform. 2018 Aug;27(1):83-90. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1667075. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
3
Usability Evaluation of Electronic Health Record System around Clinical Notes Usage-An Ethnographic Study.
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Oct;8(4):1095-1105. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2017-04-RA-0067. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
5
Utilizing the Electronic Health Record to Improve Advance Care Planning: A Systematic Review.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Mar;35(3):532-541. doi: 10.1177/1049909117715217. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
6
An appraisal of published usability evaluations of electronic health records via systematic review.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jan;24(1):218-226. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw046. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
7
Do electronic medical records improve quality of care? Yes.
Can Fam Physician. 2015 Oct;61(10):846-7, 850-1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验