Suppr超能文献

性传播感染检测:检测谁和在哪里?一项使用荷兰鹿特丹地区人群和提供者数据进行的数据分析研究。

Testing for sexually transmitted infection: who and where? A data linkage study using population and provider data in the Rotterdam area, the Netherlands.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Public Health, Municipal Public Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2023 Nov 23;40(4):599-609. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad079.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the Netherlands, insight into sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing and characteristics of those tested by general practitioners (GPs) and sexual health centres (SHC) is limited. This is partly due to lacking registration of socio-demographics at GPs. We aimed to fill this gap by linking different registers.

METHODS

Individual STI testing data of GPs and SHC were linked to population register data (aged ≥15 years, Rotterdam area, 2015-2019). We reported population-specific STI positivity, proportion STI tested, and GP-SHC testing rate comparison using negative binomial generalised additive models. Factors associated with STI testing were determined by the provider using logistic regression analyses with generalised estimating equations.

RESULTS

The proportion of STI tested was 2.8% for all residents and up to 9.8% for younger and defined migrant groups. STI positivity differed greatly by subgroup and provider (3.0-35.3%). Overall, GPs performed 3 times more STI tests than the SHC. The smallest difference in GP-SHC testing rate was for 20-24-year-olds (SHC key group). Younger age, non-western migratory background, lower household income, living more urbanised, and closer to a testing site were associated with STI testing by either GP or SHC. GPs and SHC partly test different groups: GPs test women and lower-educated more often, the SHC men and middle/higher educated.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights GPs' important role in STI testing. The GPs' role in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of STIs needs continued support and strengthening. Inter-professional exchange and collaboration between GP and SHC is warranted to reach vulnerable groups.

摘要

背景

在荷兰,对一般执业医师(GP)和性健康中心(SHC)进行的性传播感染(STI)检测及检测人群特征的了解有限。这在一定程度上是由于 GP 未对社会人口统计学数据进行登记。我们旨在通过链接不同的登记处来填补这一空白。

方法

将 GP 和 SHC 的个体 STI 检测数据与人口登记数据(年龄≥15 岁,鹿特丹地区,2015-2019 年)相关联。我们使用负二项广义加性模型报告了特定人群的 STI 阳性率、STI 检测比例和 GP-SHC 检测率比较。使用广义估计方程的逻辑回归分析确定与 STI 检测相关的因素。

结果

所有居民的 STI 检测比例为 2.8%,年轻和特定移民群体的检测比例高达 9.8%。STI 阳性率因亚组和提供者而异(3.0-35.3%)。总体而言,GP 进行的 STI 检测是 SHC 的三倍。GP-SHC 检测率差异最小的是 20-24 岁年龄组(SHC 关键组)。年龄较小、非西方移民背景、家庭收入较低、居住在城市化程度较高的地区以及离检测点较近与 GP 或 SHC 进行的 STI 检测相关。GP 和 SHC 部分检测不同的人群:GP 更多地检测女性和受教育程度较低的人群,SHC 则检测男性和中等/高等教育程度的人群。

结论

本研究强调了 GP 在 STI 检测中的重要作用。需要继续支持和加强 GP 在 STI 的预防、诊断和治疗中的作用。需要 GP 和 SHC 之间进行专业交流与合作,以覆盖弱势群体。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验