• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 Rasch 分析对痴呆患者进行认知能力筛查工具的心理测量学验证。

Psychometric validation of the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument using Rasch analysis in people with dementia.

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, Taipei City Hospital Songde Branch, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Recreation and Sports Management, University of Taipei, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Aug 11;102(32):e34093. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034093.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000034093
PMID:37565843
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10419804/
Abstract

This study aimed to examine unidimensionality of the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) using Rasch analysis and estimate Rasch person reliability in people with dementia. CASI data of people with dementia was collected from medical records of one general hospital in northern Taiwan. A total of 506 people with dementia were recruited from the Department of Neurology. The confirmatory factor analysis was first conducted to verify the fitness of one-factor model of the CASI. Unidimensionality was confirmed through 2 assumptions: the infit and outfit mean square were 0.5 to 1.5, and residual variance of the first principal component in principal component analysis was ≤20%. Rasch person reliability was estimated after undimensionality was supported. The results of one-factor model had shown that the Comparative Fit Index = 0.99, Tucker Lewis Index = 0.99, Root Means Square Error of Approximation = 0.015, and Standardized Root Mean Square Residual = 0.067, representing a good fit to the model. Both the infit and outfit mean square were ranged 0.87 to 1.37 and 0.86 to 1.42, respectively, and low residual variance of the first principal component (12.3%). Rasch person reliability result of 0.58 was satisfactory. The person-item map indicated the difference between item difficulty and person ability was within the acceptable limits (0.22 logits). Differential Item Function was found between -0.48 to 0.44 logits for gender, indicating the CASI functioned similarly for both genders. The 46 items of the CASI showed a unidimensional construct. The CASI had been demonstrated as a valid and reliable screening tool for assessing overall cognitive function in people with dementia, capturing their cognitive functions effectively.

摘要

本研究旨在使用 Rasch 分析检验认知能力筛选工具(CASI)的单维性,并估计痴呆患者的 Rasch 个体可靠性。从台湾北部一家综合医院的神经内科病历中收集了痴呆患者的 CASI 数据。共招募了 506 名来自神经内科的痴呆患者。首先进行验证性因素分析,以验证 CASI 的单因素模型的拟合度。通过两个假设来确认单维性:拟合和 outfit 均方在 0.5 到 1.5 之间,以及主成分分析中第一主成分的残差方差≤20%。在支持单维性后,估计 Rasch 个体可靠性。单因素模型的结果表明,比较拟合指数=0.99,塔克-刘易斯指数=0.99,近似均方根误差=0.015,标准化均方根残差=0.067,与模型拟合良好。拟合和 outfit 均方分别在 0.87 到 1.37 和 0.86 到 1.42 之间,第一主成分的残差方差较低(12.3%)。个体-项目图表明项目难度和个体能力之间的差异在可接受范围内(0.22 对数单位)。性别之间发现了差异项目功能,在-0.48 到 0.44 对数单位之间,表明 CASI 对两性的功能相似。CASI 的 46 个项目显示出单维结构。CASI 已被证明是一种有效的、可靠的筛选工具,用于评估痴呆患者的整体认知功能,能有效地捕捉他们的认知功能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9333/10419804/cbca29d28cd5/medi-102-e34093-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9333/10419804/cbca29d28cd5/medi-102-e34093-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9333/10419804/cbca29d28cd5/medi-102-e34093-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric validation of the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument using Rasch analysis in people with dementia.使用 Rasch 分析对痴呆患者进行认知能力筛查工具的心理测量学验证。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Aug 11;102(32):e34093. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034093.
2
Item-level psychometrics of the Ascertain Dementia Eight-Item Informant Questionnaire.阿塞特痴呆症 8 项知情者问卷的项目水平心理测量学。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 5;17(7):e0270204. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270204. eCollection 2022.
3
Psychometric validation of the Persian Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale using classic test theory and Rasch models.使用经典测试理论和拉施模型对波斯语版卑尔根社交媒体成瘾量表进行心理测量学验证。
J Behav Addict. 2017 Dec 1;6(4):620-629. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.071. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
4
Chronotype description: In search of a solid subjective amplitude scale.昼夜节律类型描述:寻找一个可靠的主观振幅量表。
Chronobiol Int. 2017;34(10):1388-1400. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2017.1372469. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
5
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
6
Enhancing the usefulness of the Mini-BESTest for measuring dynamic balance: a Rasch validation study.增强Mini-BESTest量表在测量动态平衡方面的效用:一项Rasch效度研究。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Aug;51(4):429-37. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
7
Rasch Analysis of the General Self-Efficacy Scale in Workers with Traumatic Limb Injuries.创伤性肢体损伤工人一般自我效能感量表的拉施分析
J Occup Rehabil. 2016 Sep;26(3):332-9. doi: 10.1007/s10926-015-9617-y.
8
The Quality of Life Impact Refractive Correction (QIRC) questionnaire: validation of the Malay-translated version of the QIRC using Rasch analysis.生活质量对屈光矫正的影响(QIRC)问卷:使用 Rasch 分析验证马来语翻译版 QIRC 的有效性。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Oct 25;21(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-02145-5.
9
Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2: The Use of Rasch Analysis to Examine the Model Unidimensionality, Motor Function, and Item Difficulty.皮博迪发展运动量表 - 第二版:运用拉施分析检验模型单维性、运动功能及项目难度
Front Pediatr. 2022 Apr 20;10:852732. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.852732. eCollection 2022.
10
Is the Patient Activation Measure a valid measure of osteoarthritis self-management attitudes and capabilities? Results of a Rasch analysis.患者激活度量表(PAM)是否能有效测量骨关节炎自我管理的态度和能力?一项 Rasch 分析的结果。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 May 5;18(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01364-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Item Analysis of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adults Version Using the Rasch Model in Two Forms for People With Schizophrenia in Taiwan.台湾精神分裂症患者执行功能行为评定量表成人版两种形式的拉施模型项目分析
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2025 Sep;34(3):e70034. doi: 10.1002/mpr.70034.
2
Validation of Hamdan intelligence scale in upper elementary grades using the Rasch model: exploratory study.使用拉施模型对上小学高年级学生进行哈姆丹智力量表的验证:探索性研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 30;15:1407734. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1407734. eCollection 2024.