• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用拉施模型对上小学高年级学生进行哈姆丹智力量表的验证:探索性研究。

Validation of Hamdan intelligence scale in upper elementary grades using the Rasch model: exploratory study.

作者信息

Ayoub Alaa Eldin A, Aljughaiman Abdullah M, Alghawi Mariam A, Morsy Ahmed, Omara Ehab M N, Abdulla Alabbasi Ahmed M, Renzulli Joseph S

机构信息

Department of Gifted Education, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.

Department of Educational Psychology, Aswan University, Aswan, Egypt.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 30;15:1407734. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1407734. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1407734
PMID:39282681
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11392854/
Abstract

Hamdan Intelligence Scale (HIS) is the first intelligence scale that has been developed and normed in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This study aimed to examine the refinement, validity, and reliability of HIS in upper elementary grades using the Rasch model. A total of 4,301 students (34.3% Male; 65.7% Female) from grade 4 to 6 (32.1% grade 4; 33.7% grade 5; 34.2% grade 6) were administered to the HIS. The confirmatory factor analysis was first conducted to verify the fitness of the one-factor model of the HIS. The results of validity showed strong correlation coefficients between the HIS and the Aurora- battery (0.83) and the Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices (RSPM; 0.86). Moreover, the results of the developmental trends demonstrated that raw scores of the HIS increase with age and grade relatively constantly across composite scores. Unidimensionality was confirmed through the Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Principal Component Analysis of Residuals (PCAR). The low eigenvalues of the first contrast were below 2, and additionally, the infit and outfit mean squares ranged from 0.88 to 1.14 and 0.84 to 1.14. Rasch's person reliability result of 0.62 was acceptable reliability. The results provided strong support for the validity and reliability of using the Hamdan Intelligence Scale in the UAE environment.

摘要

哈姆丹智力量表(HIS)是在阿拉伯联合酋长国(阿联酋)开发并标准化的首个智力量表。本研究旨在使用Rasch模型检验HIS在小学高年级的优化、效度和信度。对来自四年级至六年级的4301名学生(34.3%为男生;65.7%为女生)(四年级占32.1%;五年级占33.7%;六年级占34.2%)施测了HIS。首先进行验证性因素分析以检验HIS单因素模型的拟合度。效度结果显示HIS与奥罗拉成套测验(相关系数为0.83)和瑞文标准渐进矩阵测验(RSPM;相关系数为0.86)之间具有很强的相关系数。此外,发展趋势结果表明,HIS的原始分数随年龄和年级的增长而相对稳定地增加,综合分数也是如此。通过验证性因素分析和残差主成分分析(PCAR)证实了单维性。第一个对比的低特征值低于2,此外,内拟合和外拟合均方分别在0.88至1.14和0.84至1.14之间。Rasch模型的人员信度结果为0.62,信度可以接受。研究结果为在阿联酋环境中使用哈姆丹智力量表的效度和信度提供了有力支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d510/11392854/e3105d4f19e5/fpsyg-15-1407734-i001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d510/11392854/3ae08733b754/fpsyg-15-1407734-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d510/11392854/e3105d4f19e5/fpsyg-15-1407734-i001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d510/11392854/3ae08733b754/fpsyg-15-1407734-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d510/11392854/e3105d4f19e5/fpsyg-15-1407734-i001.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of Hamdan intelligence scale in upper elementary grades using the Rasch model: exploratory study.使用拉施模型对上小学高年级学生进行哈姆丹智力量表的验证:探索性研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 30;15:1407734. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1407734. eCollection 2024.
2
Rasch Analysis of the General Self-Efficacy Scale in Workers with Traumatic Limb Injuries.创伤性肢体损伤工人一般自我效能感量表的拉施分析
J Occup Rehabil. 2016 Sep;26(3):332-9. doi: 10.1007/s10926-015-9617-y.
3
Enhancing the usefulness of the Mini-BESTest for measuring dynamic balance: a Rasch validation study.增强Mini-BESTest量表在测量动态平衡方面的效用:一项Rasch效度研究。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Aug;51(4):429-37. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
4
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
5
Psychometric validation of the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument using Rasch analysis in people with dementia.使用 Rasch 分析对痴呆患者进行认知能力筛查工具的心理测量学验证。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Aug 11;102(32):e34093. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034093.
6
Validation of two short forms of Stroke Impact Scale: unidimensionality and reliability.两种简短形式的卒中影响量表的验证:单维性和信度。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Nov;45(22):3748-3754. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2135770. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
7
Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2: The Use of Rasch Analysis to Examine the Model Unidimensionality, Motor Function, and Item Difficulty.皮博迪发展运动量表 - 第二版:运用拉施分析检验模型单维性、运动功能及项目难度
Front Pediatr. 2022 Apr 20;10:852732. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.852732. eCollection 2022.
8
Rasch validation of a new scale to measure dependency in arm use in daily life: the Upper Limb Lucerne ICF-based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale.一种用于测量日常生活中上肢使用依赖性的新量表的Rasch验证:基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)的上肢卢塞恩多学科观察量表
Front Neurol. 2023 Jul 10;14:1154322. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1154322. eCollection 2023.
9
Development and validation of the symptom burden questionnaire for long covid (SBQ-LC): Rasch analysis.长新冠症状负担问卷(SBQ-LC)的编制与验证:Rasch 分析。
BMJ. 2022 Apr 27;377:e070230. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070230.
10
The Revision and Application of Aurora in China: Based on Successful Intelligence.《奥罗拉在中国的修订与应用:基于成功智力》
J Intell. 2022 Dec 6;10(4):120. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10040120.

本文引用的文献

1
Creative activity and accomplishment as indicators of polymathy among gifted and nongifted students.创造性活动与成就作为资优和非资优学生多学科才能的指标。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 10;14:1255508. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1255508. eCollection 2023.
2
Psychometric validation of the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument using Rasch analysis in people with dementia.使用 Rasch 分析对痴呆患者进行认知能力筛查工具的心理测量学验证。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Aug 11;102(32):e34093. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034093.
3
Modern Assessments of Intelligence Must Be Fair and Equitable.
现代智力评估必须公平公正。
J Intell. 2023 Jun 20;11(6):126. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11060126.
4
Do Different Types of Intelligence and Its Implicit Theories Vary Based on Gender and Grade Level?不同类型的智力及其内隐理论是否因性别和年级水平而异?
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 27;12:712330. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712330. eCollection 2021.
5
Revisiting the Role of Worries in Explaining the Link Between Test Anxiety and Test Performance.重新审视担忧在解释考试焦虑与考试成绩之间联系中的作用。
Educ Psychol Rev. 2021;33(4):1887-1906. doi: 10.1007/s10648-021-09601-0. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
6
Which Divergent Thinking Index Is More Associated With Problem Finding Ability? The Role of Flexibility and Task Nature.哪种发散性思维指数与问题发现能力的关联更大?灵活性和任务性质的作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 22;12:671146. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.671146. eCollection 2021.
7
A Rasch analysis of the self-administered Foot Health Assessment Instrument (S-FHAI).自我管理足部健康评估工具(S-FHAI)的拉施分析。
BMC Nurs. 2021 Jun 15;20(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00625-z.
8
The Development of Instrument to Assess Physician's Practice in the Management of Patients With Terminal Diseases.评估医生在管理终末期疾病患者方面的实践情况的工具的开发。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720972587. doi: 10.1177/2150132720972587.
9
The Looking Glass for Intelligence Quotient Tests: The Interplay of Motivation, Cognitive Functioning, and Affect.智商测试的镜子:动机、认知功能与情感的相互作用
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 17;10:2857. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02857. eCollection 2019.
10
Critical Values for Yen's : Identification of Local Dependence in the Rasch Model Using Residual Correlations.严氏临界值:使用残差相关性识别拉施模型中的局部依赖性
Appl Psychol Meas. 2017 May;41(3):178-194. doi: 10.1177/0146621616677520. Epub 2016 Nov 16.