Maccabi Institute for Research and Innovation, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Adv Ther. 2023 Oct;40(10):4504-4522. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02607-w. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatics drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) are important treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). As more of these drugs become available, there is a greater need to assess their real-world adherence and drug survival.
Treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients with RA who initiated treatment with bDMARDs and tofactinib during 2015-2018 in a large Israeli health maintenance organization were included. Adherence and time to treatment suspension were recorded. Odds for adherence were estimated using a multivariable logistic regression model. Risk for treatment suspension was estimated using a mixed-effect Cox proportional hazard model.
The analysis included 753 eligible patients (61.8% treatment-naïve) treated with 1287 treatment episodes (tofacitinib 24.2%, tocilizumab 17.5%, etanercept 16.0%, adalimumab 10.4%, abatacept 9.9%, rituximab 9.0%, golimumab 6.9%, certolizumab pegol 3.6%, infliximab 1.9%, and sarilumab 0.5%). Good adherence was measured for almost all drugs, yet over 50% of all treatment episodes were suspended. Older age was associated with reduced risk for treatment suspension while higher number of primary care visits and higher Charlson's comorbidity score were associated with increased risk. Compared to etanercept, treatment with adalimumab, certolizumab, or rituximab was associated with increased risk for treatment suspension (HR 1.68 95% CI 1.27-2.22, HR 1.62 95% CI 1.00-2.60, and HR 2.72 95% CI 2.02-3.67, respectively).
Treatment choice primarily depends on disease activity and prognosis. Real-world data, showing differences in drug survival of bDMARDs and tsDMARD, can also be used in the variety of considerations when choosing treatment. Future studies could separate patients with RA into subgroups, which would also account for potential drug survival differences and enable personalized therapy.
生物改善病情抗风湿药物(bDMARDs)和靶向合成 DMARDs(tsDMARDs)是类风湿关节炎(RA)的重要治疗方法。随着越来越多的这类药物上市,评估它们在真实世界中的依从性和药物生存情况变得尤为重要。
纳入了 2015 年至 2018 年期间在以色列一家大型健康维护组织中首次接受 bDMARDs 和托法替尼治疗的初治和治疗经验丰富的 RA 患者。记录了患者的依从性和治疗暂停时间。使用多变量逻辑回归模型估计了患者的依从性。使用混合效应 Cox 比例风险模型估计了治疗暂停的风险。
该分析共纳入了 753 名符合条件的患者(61.8%为初治患者),他们接受了 1287 个治疗疗程(托法替尼 24.2%,托珠单抗 17.5%,依那西普 16.0%,阿达木单抗 10.4%,阿巴西普 9.9%,利妥昔单抗 9.0%,戈利木单抗 6.9%,培塞利珠单抗 3.6%,英夫利昔单抗 1.9%,和瑟鲁利单抗 0.5%)。几乎所有药物的依从性都很好,但超过 50%的治疗疗程被暂停。与治疗暂停风险降低相关的是年龄较大,而与治疗暂停风险增加相关的是就诊次数较多和 Charlson 合并症评分较高。与依那西普相比,阿达木单抗、依那西普或利妥昔单抗治疗与治疗暂停风险增加相关(HR 1.68 95%CI 1.27-2.22,HR 1.62 95%CI 1.00-2.60,HR 2.72 95%CI 2.02-3.67)。
治疗选择主要取决于疾病活动度和预后。真实世界的数据显示 bDMARDs 和 tsDMARD 的药物生存存在差异,也可以在选择治疗方法时综合考虑这些差异。未来的研究可以将 RA 患者分为亚组,这也将考虑到潜在的药物生存差异,并实现个体化治疗。