• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定针对16至18岁青少年的基于网络的同伴网络研究使用经济补偿的最有效招募策略:一项随机对照试验的方案

Identifying the Most Effective Recruitment Strategy Using Financial Reimbursements for a Web-Based Peer Network Study With Young People Aged 16-18 Years: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Raggatt Michelle, Wright Cassandra J C, Sacks-Davis Rachel, Dietze Paul M, Hellard Margaret E, Hocking Jane S, Lim Megan S C

机构信息

Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.

School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Aug 11;12:e44813. doi: 10.2196/44813.

DOI:10.2196/44813
PMID:37566448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10457703/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peers are an important determinant of health and well-being during late adolescence; however, there is limited quantitative research examining peer influence. Previous peer network research with adolescents faced methodological limitations and difficulties recruiting young people.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to determine whether a web-based peer network survey is effective at recruiting adolescent peer networks by comparing 2 strategies for reimbursement.

METHODS

This study will use a 2-group randomized trial design to test the effectiveness of reimbursements for peer referral in a web-based cross-sectional peer network survey. Young people aged 16-18 years recruited through Instagram, Snapchat, and a survey panel will be randomized to receive either scaled group reimbursement (the experimental group) or fixed individual reimbursement (the control group). All participants will receive a reimbursement of Aus $5 (US $3.70) for their own survey completion. In the experimental group (scaled group reimbursement), all participants within a peer network will receive an additional Aus $5 (US $3.70) voucher for each referred participant who completes the study, up to a maximum total value of Aus $30 (US $22.20) per participant. In the control group (fixed individual reimbursement), participants will only be reimbursed for their own survey completion. Participants' peer networks are assessed during the survey by asking about their close friends. A unique survey link will be generated to share with the participant's nominated friends for the recruitment of secondary participants. Outcomes are the proportion of a participant's peer network and the number of referred peers who complete the survey. The required sample size is 306 primary participants. Using a multilevel logistic regression model, we will assess the effect of the reimbursement intervention on the proportion of primary participants' close friends who complete the survey. The secondary aim is to determine participant characteristics that are associated with successfully recruiting close friends. Young people aged 16-18 years were involved in the development of the study design through focus groups and interviews (n=26).

RESULTS

Participant recruitment commenced in 2022.

CONCLUSIONS

A longitudinal web-based social network study could provide important data on how social networks and their influence change over time. This trial aims to determine whether scaled group reimbursement can increase the number of peers referred. The outcomes of this trial will improve the recruitment of young people to web-based network studies of sensitive health issues.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/44813.

摘要

背景

同龄人是青春期后期健康和幸福的重要决定因素;然而,关于同龄人影响的定量研究有限。以往针对青少年的同龄人网络研究面临方法上的局限性以及招募年轻人的困难。

目的

本研究旨在通过比较两种报销策略,确定基于网络的同龄人网络调查在招募青少年同龄人网络方面是否有效。

方法

本研究将采用两组随机试验设计,以测试在基于网络的横断面同龄人网络调查中,同龄人推荐报销的有效性。通过照片墙(Instagram)、色拉布(Snapchat)和一个调查小组招募的16至18岁年轻人将被随机分组,分别接受按比例的小组报销(实验组)或固定的个人报销(对照组)。所有参与者完成自身调查问卷后将获得5澳元(3.70美元)的报销。在实验组(按比例的小组报销)中,同龄人网络中的所有参与者,每有一名被推荐的参与者完成研究,他们将额外获得一张5澳元(3.70美元)的代金券,每位参与者的代金券总价值最高为30澳元(22.20美元)。在对照组(固定的个人报销)中,参与者仅会因自身完成调查问卷而获得报销。在调查过程中,通过询问参与者的亲密朋友来评估其同龄人网络。将生成一个独特的调查链接,供参与者与他们提名的朋友分享,以招募二级参与者。结果指标是参与者同龄人网络的比例以及完成调查的被推荐同龄人的数量。所需样本量为306名主要参与者。我们将使用多水平逻辑回归模型,评估报销干预对完成调查的主要参与者亲密朋友比例的影响。次要目的是确定与成功招募亲密朋友相关的参与者特征。16至18岁的年轻人通过焦点小组和访谈参与了研究设计的制定(n = 26)。

结果

参与者招募于2022年开始。

结论

一项基于网络的纵向社交网络研究可以提供关于社交网络及其影响如何随时间变化的重要数据。本试验旨在确定按比例的小组报销是否能增加被推荐同龄人的数量。该试验的结果将改善针对敏感健康问题的基于网络的网络研究中年轻人的招募情况。

国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/44813。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e301/10457703/a2473609c92e/resprot_v12i1e44813_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e301/10457703/a2473609c92e/resprot_v12i1e44813_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e301/10457703/a2473609c92e/resprot_v12i1e44813_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying the Most Effective Recruitment Strategy Using Financial Reimbursements for a Web-Based Peer Network Study With Young People Aged 16-18 Years: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.确定针对16至18岁青少年的基于网络的同伴网络研究使用经济补偿的最有效招募策略:一项随机对照试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Aug 11;12:e44813. doi: 10.2196/44813.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Recruiting and Retaining Youth and Young Adults in the Policy and Communication Evaluation (PACE) Vermont Study: Randomized Controlled Trial of Participant Compensation.招募和留住政策和传播评估(PACE)佛蒙特研究中的青年和年轻人:参与者补偿的随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 20;22(7):e18446. doi: 10.2196/18446.
4
Monetary incentives and peer referral in promoting secondary distribution of HIV self-testing among men who have sex with men in China: A randomized controlled trial.货币激励和同伴推荐在中国男男性行为者中促进 HIV 自我检测的二级分发:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2022 Feb 14;19(2):e1003928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003928. eCollection 2022 Feb.
5
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
6
Detecting and Understanding Social Influence During Drinking Situations: Protocol for a Bluetooth-Based Sensor Feasibility and Acceptability Study.检测和理解饮酒情境中的社会影响:基于蓝牙传感器的可行性和可接受性研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jun 6;13:e50650. doi: 10.2196/50650.
7
Testing the Impact of the #chatsafe Intervention on Young People's Ability to Communicate Safely About Suicide on Social Media: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.测试#chatsafe干预措施对年轻人在社交媒体上安全交流自杀相关话题能力的影响:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Feb 17;12:e44300. doi: 10.2196/44300.
8
A Microfinance Intervention With or Without Peer Support to Improve Mental Health Among Transgender and Nonbinary Adults (the Creating Access to Resources and Economic Support Study): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.一项有或没有同伴支持的小额金融干预措施,以改善跨性别和非二元成年人的心理健康(创造资源和经济支持研究):一项随机对照试验的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 26;13:e63656. doi: 10.2196/63656.
9
Development of a Web-Based Peer Support Program for Family Caregivers of Ventilator-Assisted Individuals Living in the Community: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.为社区中使用呼吸机的个体的家庭照顾者开发基于网络的同伴支持项目:一项试点随机对照试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Feb 6;8(2):e11827. doi: 10.2196/11827.
10
Exploring Different Incentive Structures Among US Adults Who Use e-Cigarettes to Optimize Retention in Longitudinal Web-Based Surveys: Case Study.探索美国使用电子烟的成年人之间不同激励结构以优化纵向网络调查中的保留率:案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 13;25:e49354. doi: 10.2196/49354.

本文引用的文献

1
Peer social network processes and adolescent health behaviors: A systematic review.同伴社会网络过程与青少年健康行为:系统综述。
Prev Med. 2020 Jan;130:105900. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105900. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
2
Youth Study Recruitment Using Paid Advertising on Instagram, Snapchat, and Facebook: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.利用Instagram、Snapchat和Facebook上的付费广告招募青年研究对象:横断面调查研究
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2019 Oct 9;5(4):e14080. doi: 10.2196/14080.
3
Recruiting for health, medical or psychosocial research using Facebook: Systematic review.
利用脸书招募健康、医学或社会心理研究对象:系统评价
Internet Interv. 2016 Apr 27;4:72-81. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2016.02.001. eCollection 2016 May.
4
Recruiting Hard-to-Reach Populations for Survey Research: Using Facebook and Instagram Advertisements and In-Person Intercept in LGBT Bars and Nightclubs to Recruit LGBT Young Adults.为调查研究招募难以接触到的人群:利用脸书和照片墙广告以及在 LGBT 酒吧和夜总会进行实地拦截来招募 LGBT 青年成年人。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 18;20(6):e197. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9461.
5
An Appraisal of Social Network Theory and Analysis as Applied to Public Health: Challenges and Opportunities.社会网络理论与分析在公共卫生领域的应用评价:挑战与机遇。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2017 Mar 20;38:103-118. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044528. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
6
Potential and Challenges in Collecting Social and Behavioral Data on Adolescent Alcohol Norms: Comparing Respondent-Driven Sampling and Web-Based Respondent-Driven Sampling.收集青少年饮酒规范社会和行为数据的潜力与挑战:比较应答驱动抽样和基于网络的应答驱动抽样
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 24;17(12):e285. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4762.
7
Social Network Assessments and Interventions for Health Behavior Change: A Critical Review.用于健康行为改变的社交网络评估与干预:一项批判性综述。
Behav Med. 2015;41(3):90-7. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2015.1034645.
8
Correlates of gambling on high-school grounds.高中校园内赌博的相关因素。
Addict Behav. 2015 Dec;51:57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
9
US adolescents' friendship networks and health risk behaviors: a systematic review of studies using social network analysis and Add Health data.美国青少年的友谊网络与健康风险行为:对使用社会网络分析和“青少年健康纵向研究”数据的研究进行的系统综述
PeerJ. 2015 Jun 30;3:e1052. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1052. eCollection 2015.
10
Facebook as a recruitment tool for adolescent health research: a systematic review.脸书作为青少年健康研究的招募工具:一项系统综述。
Acad Pediatr. 2014 Sep-Oct;14(5):439-447.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2014.05.049.