• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

功能性认知障碍的临床特征:系统评价和诊断荟萃分析。

Clinical signs in functional cognitive disorders: A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.

机构信息

Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 2023 Oct;173:111447. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111447. Epub 2023 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111447
PMID:37567095
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Functional cognitive disorder (FCD) accounts for around a third of patients attending specialized memory clinics. It is also overrepresented in patients with other functional and somatic diagnoses. So far, no long-term diagnostic validity studies were conducted, and a positive diagnostic profile is yet to be identified. We aimed to review the literature on diagnostic signs and symptoms that allow for a discrimination between FCD and neurodegeneration.

METHODS

Systematic review of Ovid-Medline®, Embase and PsycINFO databases. Relevant clinical features were extracted including demographics, symptom history, comorbidities, language and interaction profiles and cognitive assessments. Studies with quantifiable diagnostic accuracy data were included in a diagnostic meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty studies (N = 8602) were included. FCD patients were younger, more educated, and more likely to have a family history of older onset dementia, abrupt symptom onset, and higher rates of anxiety, depression and sleep disturbance. Promising language profiles include longer duration of spoken answer, elaborated examples of memory failures, ability to answer compound and personal questions, and demonstration of working memory during interaction. The pooled analysis of clinical accuracy of different signs revealed that attending alone and bringing a handwritten list of problems particularly increase the odds of a FCD diagnosis. Current evidence from neuropsychometric studies in FCD is scarce.

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review reinforces that positive signs contribute for an early differentiation between FCD and neurodegeneration in patients presenting with memory complaints. It is the first to attain quantitative value to clinical observations. These results will inform future diagnostic decision tools and intervention testing.

摘要

目的

功能性认知障碍(FCD)约占专门记忆诊所就诊患者的三分之一。它在其他功能性和躯体性诊断患者中也更为常见。到目前为止,还没有进行长期的诊断有效性研究,也尚未确定明确的阳性诊断特征。我们旨在回顾关于有助于区分 FCD 和神经退行性变的诊断体征和症状的文献。

方法

对 Ovid-Medline®、Embase 和 PsycINFO 数据库进行系统综述。提取了相关的临床特征,包括人口统计学、症状史、合并症、语言和互动特征以及认知评估。纳入了具有可量化诊断准确性数据的研究进行诊断荟萃分析。

结果

共纳入 30 项研究(N=8602)。FCD 患者年龄较小、受教育程度较高,且更有可能有家族性老年发病痴呆史、症状突然发作、焦虑、抑郁和睡眠障碍的发生率较高。有希望的语言特征包括回答持续时间较长、记忆失败的详细例子、回答复合和个人问题的能力,以及在互动过程中展示工作记忆。不同体征的临床准确性的汇总分析表明,单独就诊和携带手写问题清单特别增加了 FCD 诊断的可能性。目前 FCD 神经心理测量研究的证据有限。

结论

我们的系统综述强化了这样一种观点,即积极的体征有助于在出现记忆问题的患者中早期区分 FCD 和神经退行性变。这是首次对临床观察获得定量价值。这些结果将为未来的诊断决策工具和干预测试提供信息。

相似文献

1
Clinical signs in functional cognitive disorders: A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.功能性认知障碍的临床特征:系统评价和诊断荟萃分析。
J Psychosom Res. 2023 Oct;173:111447. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111447. Epub 2023 Aug 5.
2
Clinical judgement by primary care physicians for the diagnosis of all-cause dementia or cognitive impairment in symptomatic people.初级保健医生对有症状人群进行全因痴呆或认知障碍诊断的临床判断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 16;6(6):CD012558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012558.pub2.
3
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
4
New generation antidepressants for depression in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis.新一代抗抑郁药治疗儿童和青少年抑郁症:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;5(5):CD013674. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013674.pub2.
5
Pharmacotherapies for sleep disturbances in dementia.痴呆症睡眠障碍的药物治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 16;11(11):CD009178. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009178.pub3.
6
Therapist-supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults.治疗师支持的针对成人焦虑症的互联网认知行为疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 12;3(3):CD011565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011565.pub2.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
CSF tau and the CSF tau/ABeta ratio for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).脑脊液tau蛋白及脑脊液tau蛋白与β淀粉样蛋白比值在轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者中用于诊断阿尔茨海默病性痴呆及其他痴呆。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 22;3(3):CD010803. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010803.pub2.
9
Technological aids for the rehabilitation of memory and executive functioning in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury.脑损伤儿童和青少年记忆与执行功能康复的技术辅助手段。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 1;7(7):CD011020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011020.pub2.
10
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.

引用本文的文献

1
Saccadic eye movements differentiate functional cognitive disorder from mild cognitive impairment.扫视眼动可区分功能性认知障碍与轻度认知障碍。
Perception. 2025 Oct;54(10):768-779. doi: 10.1177/03010066251359215. Epub 2025 Jul 29.
2
Feasibility trial of a self-help digital intervention for functional cognitive disorder.功能性认知障碍自助数字干预的可行性试验。
Brain Commun. 2025 Jun 19;7(4):fcaf248. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf248. eCollection 2025.
3
Functional neurological disorder: Practical management.功能性神经障碍:实用管理方法
Neurotherapeutics. 2025 Jul;22(4):e00612. doi: 10.1016/j.neurot.2025.e00612. Epub 2025 May 20.
4
Development of a diagnostic checklist to identify functional cognitive disorder versus other neurocognitive disorders.制定一份诊断清单,以鉴别功能性认知障碍与其他神经认知障碍。
BMJ Neurol Open. 2025 Feb 27;7(1):e000918. doi: 10.1136/bmjno-2024-000918. eCollection 2025.
5
Precipitating Factors for Functional Cognitive Disorder.功能性认知障碍的诱发因素。
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Mar;32(3):e70082. doi: 10.1111/ene.70082.
6
Brain health clinics - An evolving clinical pathway?脑健康诊所——一种不断演变的临床路径?
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Mar;12(3):100051. doi: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2024.100051. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
7
The overlooked burden of persistent physical symptoms: a call for action in European healthcare.持续性身体症状被忽视的负担:呼吁欧洲医疗保健采取行动
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Nov 26;48:101140. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101140. eCollection 2025 Jan.
8
Perspectives on the diagnosis and management of functional cognitive disorder: An international Delphi study.功能性认知障碍的诊断与管理视角:一项国际德尔菲研究。
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Jan;32(1):e16318. doi: 10.1111/ene.16318. Epub 2024 May 3.