• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个用于传达与黄曲霉毒素相关风险的模型框架。

A model framework to communicate the risks associated with aflatoxins.

作者信息

Bhardwaj Kiran, Meneely Julie P, Haughey Simon A, Dean Moira, Wall Patrick, Petchkongkaew Awanwee, Baker Bob, Zhang Guangtao, Elliott Christopher T

机构信息

Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 5DL, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.

University College Dublin, School of Public Health Physiotherapy and Sports Science, Woodview House Belfield Dublin 4, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

NPJ Sci Food. 2023 Aug 11;7(1):40. doi: 10.1038/s41538-023-00217-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41538-023-00217-y
PMID:37567867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10421891/
Abstract

Risk communication is defined as the interactive exchange of information and opinions concerning risk, risk-related factors and risk perceptions amongst all the stakeholders of food safety throughout the risk analysis process. The interactive exchange of information occurs at three different levels i.e. informed level, dialogue level and engagement level. For an effective food safety risk communication (FSRC), it is important that the information should adhere to the core principles of risk communication which are transparency, openness, responsiveness and timeliness. Communication of a food safety risk within all the components of risk communication strategy constitutes a complex network of information flow that can be better understood with the help of a framework. Therefore, a model framework to communicate the risks associated with aflatoxins (AFs) dietary intake has been developed with the aim of (a) creating general awareness amongst public and (b) involving industry stakeholders in the prevention and control of risk. The framework has been motivated by the learnings and best practices outlined in the identified technical guidance documents for risk communication. Risk assessors, risk managers, industry stakeholders and general public have been identified as the major stakeholders for the present framework. Amongst them, industry stakeholders and general public has been selected as the major target audience for risk managers. Moreover, population residing in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) has been identified as the main target group to reach.

摘要

风险沟通被定义为在整个风险分析过程中,食品安全所有利益相关者之间就风险、风险相关因素和风险认知进行的信息和意见的互动交流。信息的互动交流发生在三个不同层面,即告知层面、对话层面和参与层面。对于有效的食品安全风险沟通(FSRC)而言,信息应遵循风险沟通的核心原则,即透明度、开放性、响应性和及时性,这一点很重要。在风险沟通策略的所有组成部分内进行食品安全风险沟通,构成了一个复杂的信息流网络,借助一个框架能更好地理解这一网络。因此,已开发出一个用于传达黄曲霉毒素(AFs)膳食摄入相关风险的模型框架,目的是(a)提高公众的总体认识,以及(b)让行业利益相关者参与风险的预防和控制。该框架的灵感来源于已确定的风险沟通技术指导文件中概述的经验教训和最佳实践。风险评估者、风险管理者、行业利益相关者和公众已被确定为当前框架的主要利益相关者。其中,行业利益相关者和公众已被选为风险管理者的主要目标受众。此外,低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)的居民已被确定为主要的目标群体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b88/10421891/89709ceb9a07/41538_2023_217_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b88/10421891/89709ceb9a07/41538_2023_217_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b88/10421891/89709ceb9a07/41538_2023_217_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A model framework to communicate the risks associated with aflatoxins.一个用于传达与黄曲霉毒素相关风险的模型框架。
NPJ Sci Food. 2023 Aug 11;7(1):40. doi: 10.1038/s41538-023-00217-y.
2
Theoretical and practical aspects of risk communication in food safety: A review study.食品安全风险沟通的理论与实践层面:一项综述研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 11;9(7):e18141. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18141. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
Communication in a Human biomonitoring study: Focus group work, public engagement and lessons learnt in 17 European countries.一项人体生物监测研究中的沟通:焦点小组工作、公众参与以及在17个欧洲国家获得的经验教训。
Environ Res. 2015 Aug;141:31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
4
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
New trends in science communication fostering evidence-informed policymaking.促进基于证据的决策制定的科学传播新趋势。
Open Res Eur. 2023 Oct 24;2:78. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.14769.2. eCollection 2022.
8
Technical assistance in the field of risk communication.风险沟通领域的技术援助。
EFSA J. 2021 Apr 29;19(4):e06574. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6574. eCollection 2021 Apr.
9
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
10
Risk communication discourse among ecological risk assessment professionals and its implications for communication with nonexperts.生态风险评估专业人员之间的风险沟通话语及其对与非专业人士沟通的启示。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2013 Oct;9(4):616-22. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1426. Epub 2013 Aug 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Mapping Sources of Food Safety Information for U.S. Consumers: Findings From a National Survey.美国消费者食品安全信息来源的映射:一项全国性调查的结果
Health Commun. 2017 Mar;32(3):356-365. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1138385. Epub 2016 Jun 6.