• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较四种 DNA 提取方法在人类粪便样本 16s rRNA 微生物组分析中的应用。

Comparison of four DNA extraction methods for 16s rRNA microbiota profiling of human faecal samples.

机构信息

Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, QLD, 4215, Australia.

School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, QLD, 4215, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2023 Aug 11;16(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13104-023-06451-7.

DOI:10.1186/s13104-023-06451-7
PMID:37568179
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10422837/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Growth in large population-based studies assessing contributions of the gut microbiota to health and disease requires high-throughput sample processing and analysis methods. This study assessed the impact that modifications to a commercially available magnetic bead based, semi-automated DNA extraction kit had on determination of microbial composition, relative to an established in-house method involving a combination of mechanical and chemical lysis. DNA was extracted from faecal samples from healthy adults (n = 12; 34-69 years), microbial composition was determined by V3-V4 16s rRNA sequencing and compared between extraction methods.

RESULTS

Diversity metrics did not differ between extraction methods. Differences in the relative abundance of key phyla, including a significantly lower abundance of the Firmicutes (p = 0.004) and higher relative abundance of the Bacteroidetes (p = 0.005) and Proteobacteria (p = 0.008) phyla were noted where the DNA extraction did not include additional chemical and mechanical lysis. Principal coordinate analysis of family and genera level data also suggested a potential for sample pre-processing to impact microbial composition. Observations of the potential for skewed microbial composition profiles from samples prepared using a semi-automated DNA extraction kit without additional sample pre-processing highlights a need for consideration of standardisation of methodological approaches to increase the comparability of microbial compositional data.

摘要

目的

在评估肠道微生物群对健康和疾病的贡献的大型基于人群的研究中,需要高通量的样本处理和分析方法。本研究评估了对市售基于磁珠的半自动化 DNA 提取试剂盒进行修改对微生物组成的确定的影响,与涉及机械和化学裂解组合的内部方法相比。从健康成年人(n=12;34-69 岁)的粪便样本中提取 DNA,通过 V3-V4 16s rRNA 测序确定微生物组成,并在提取方法之间进行比较。

结果

提取方法之间的多样性指标没有差异。在关键门的相对丰度上存在差异,包括厚壁菌门(Firmicutes)的丰度显著降低(p=0.004),拟杆菌门(Bacteroidetes)和变形菌门(Proteobacteria)的相对丰度更高(p=0.005 和 p=0.008),其中 DNA 提取不包括额外的化学和机械裂解。在科和属水平数据的主坐标分析中,还观察到样品预处理可能会影响微生物组成。使用没有额外样品预处理的半自动化 DNA 提取试剂盒制备的样品中存在潜在的微生物组成谱偏斜的观察结果,突出了需要考虑标准化方法学方法,以提高微生物组成数据的可比性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6372/10422837/0309c098de69/13104_2023_6451_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6372/10422837/0309c098de69/13104_2023_6451_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6372/10422837/0309c098de69/13104_2023_6451_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of four DNA extraction methods for 16s rRNA microbiota profiling of human faecal samples.比较四种 DNA 提取方法在人类粪便样本 16s rRNA 微生物组分析中的应用。
BMC Res Notes. 2023 Aug 11;16(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13104-023-06451-7.
2
High-throughput DNA extraction strategy for fecal microbiome studies.高通量粪便微生物组研究的 DNA 提取策略。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jun 4;12(6):e0293223. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02932-23. Epub 2024 May 15.
3
Optimisation of 16S rRNA gut microbiota profiling of extremely low birth weight infants.优化极低出生体重儿 16S rRNA 肠道微生物群分析。
BMC Genomics. 2017 Nov 2;18(1):841. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4229-x.
4
Comparison of DNA extraction methods for human gut microbial community profiling.比较用于人类肠道微生物群落分析的 DNA 提取方法。
Syst Appl Microbiol. 2018 Mar;41(2):151-157. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2017.11.008. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
5
Are all faecal bacteria detected with equal efficiency? A study using next-generation sequencing and quantitative culture of infants' faecal samples.所有粪便细菌的检测效率都一样吗?一项使用下一代测序和婴儿粪便样本定量培养的研究。
J Microbiol Methods. 2020 Oct;177:106018. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2020.106018. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
6
Storage and handling of human faecal samples affect the gut microbiome composition: A feasibility study.人类粪便样本的储存与处理会影响肠道微生物群组成:一项可行性研究。
J Microbiol Methods. 2019 Sep;164:105668. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2019.105668. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
7
Helminth infections and gut microbiota - a feline perspective.蠕虫感染与肠道微生物群——猫的视角
Parasit Vectors. 2016 Dec 3;9(1):625. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1908-4.
8
Impact of DNA extraction, sample dilution, and reagent contamination on 16S rRNA gene sequencing of human feces.人粪便 16S rRNA 基因测序中 DNA 提取、样本稀释和试剂污染的影响。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018 Jan;102(1):403-411. doi: 10.1007/s00253-017-8583-z. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
9
The impacts of faecal subsampling on microbial compositional profiling.粪便亚群采样对微生物组成分析的影响。
BMC Res Notes. 2022 Feb 14;15(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-05923-6.
10
[Analysis of the dynamic changes in gut microbiota in patients with extremely severe burns by 16S ribosomal RNA high-throughput sequencing technology].[16S核糖体RNA高通量测序技术分析特重度烧伤患者肠道微生物群的动态变化]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2020 Dec 20;36(12):1159-1166. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200518-00271.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of dietary fiber on Chinese children with functional constipation and targeted modification of gut microbiota and related metabolites.膳食纤维对中国功能性便秘儿童的影响以及肠道微生物群和相关代谢物的靶向改变。
Front Nutr. 2025 Jul 14;12:1579668. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1579668. eCollection 2025.
2
The Role of Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis in Erectile Dysfunction: From Pathophysiology to Treatment Strategies.肠道微生物群失调在勃起功能障碍中的作用:从病理生理学到治疗策略
Microorganisms. 2025 Jan 23;13(2):250. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13020250.
3
Metrological evaluation of DNA extraction method effects on the bacterial microbiome and resistome in sputum.

本文引用的文献

1
The gut microbiome in human health and disease-Where are we and where are we going? A bibliometric analysis.人类健康与疾病中的肠道微生物群——我们现状如何,又将走向何方?一项文献计量分析
Front Microbiol. 2022 Dec 15;13:1018594. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1018594. eCollection 2022.
2
The impacts of faecal subsampling on microbial compositional profiling.粪便亚群采样对微生物组成分析的影响。
BMC Res Notes. 2022 Feb 14;15(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-05923-6.
3
Benchmarking of 16S rRNA gene databases using known strain sequences.使用已知菌株序列对16S rRNA基因数据库进行基准测试。
对痰液中细菌微生物组和耐药组的 DNA 提取方法效果进行计量评估。
mSystems. 2024 Sep 17;9(9):e0073524. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00735-24. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
4
Changes in the Gastrointestinal Microbiota Induced by Proton Pump Inhibitors-A Review of Findings from Experimental Trials.质子泵抑制剂诱导的胃肠道微生物群变化——实验性试验结果综述
Microorganisms. 2024 May 30;12(6):1110. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12061110.
Bioinformation. 2021 Mar 31;17(3):377-391. doi: 10.6026/97320630017377. eCollection 2021.
4
Validation and standardization of DNA extraction and library construction methods for metagenomics-based human fecal microbiome measurements.基于宏基因组学的人粪便微生物组测量的 DNA 提取和文库构建方法的验证和标准化。
Microbiome. 2021 Apr 29;9(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01048-3.
5
Stool sampling and DNA isolation kits affect DNA quality and bacterial composition following 16S rRNA gene sequencing using MiSeq Illumina platform.粪便采样和 DNA 提取试剂盒会影响使用 MiSeq Illumina 平台进行 16S rRNA 基因测序后的 DNA 质量和细菌组成。
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 25;9(1):13837. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49520-3.
6
The effect of 16S rRNA region choice on bacterial community metabarcoding results.16S rRNA 区域选择对细菌群落宏条形码结果的影响。
Sci Data. 2019 Feb 5;6:190007. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2019.7.
7
Impact of DNA extraction method and targeted 16S-rRNA hypervariable region on oral microbiota profiling.DNA 提取方法和靶向 16S-rRNA 高变区对口腔微生物组分析的影响。
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 5;8(1):16321. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34294-x.
8
The impact of different methods of DNA extraction on microbial community measures of BALF samples based on metagenomic data.基于宏基因组数据,不同DNA提取方法对支气管肺泡灌洗(BALF)样本微生物群落测定的影响。
Am J Transl Res. 2016 Mar 15;8(3):1412-25. eCollection 2016.
9
Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles.样本储存条件显著影响粪便微生物群谱。
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 17;5:16350. doi: 10.1038/srep16350.
10
Collection media and delayed freezing effects on microbial composition of human stool.收集培养基和延迟冷冻对人体粪便微生物组成的影响
Microbiome. 2015 Aug 12;3:33. doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0092-7. eCollection 2015.