• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

粪便采样和 DNA 提取试剂盒会影响使用 MiSeq Illumina 平台进行 16S rRNA 基因测序后的 DNA 质量和细菌组成。

Stool sampling and DNA isolation kits affect DNA quality and bacterial composition following 16S rRNA gene sequencing using MiSeq Illumina platform.

机构信息

RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic.

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 12, Brno, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 25;9(1):13837. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49520-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-49520-3
PMID:31554833
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6761292/
Abstract

Many studies correlate changes in human gut microbiome with the onset of various diseases, mostly by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Setting up the optimal sampling and DNA isolation procedures is crucial for robustness and reproducibility of the results. We performed a systematic comparison of several sampling and DNA isolation kits, quantified their effect on bacterial gDNA quality and the bacterial composition estimates at all taxonomic levels. Sixteen volunteers tested three sampling kits. All samples were consequently processed by two DNA isolation kits. We found that the choice of both stool sampling and DNA isolation kits have an effect on bacterial composition with respect to Gram-positivity, however the isolation kit had a stronger effect than the sampling kit. The proportion of bacteria affected by isolation and sampling kits was larger at higher taxa levels compared to lower taxa levels. The PowerLyzer PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit outperformed the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit mainly due to better lysis of Gram-positive bacteria while keeping the values of all the other assessed parameters within a reasonable range. The presented effects need to be taken into account when comparing results across multiple studies or computing ratios between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.

摘要

许多研究将人类肠道微生物组的变化与各种疾病的发生联系起来,主要通过 16S rRNA 基因测序来实现。建立最佳的采样和 DNA 分离程序对于结果的稳健性和可重复性至关重要。我们对几种采样和 DNA 分离试剂盒进行了系统比较,定量评估了它们对细菌 gDNA 质量和所有分类水平细菌组成估计的影响。16 名志愿者测试了三种采样试剂盒。所有样本随后都通过两种 DNA 分离试剂盒进行处理。我们发现,粪便采样和 DNA 分离试剂盒的选择都会对细菌组成产生影响,特别是对革兰氏阳性菌,但分离试剂盒的影响比采样试剂盒更强。与低分类水平相比,在较高的分类水平上,受分离和采样试剂盒影响的细菌比例更大。PowerLyzer PowerSoil DNA 分离试剂盒的性能优于 QIAamp DNA Stool Mini 试剂盒,主要是因为它能够更好地裂解革兰氏阳性菌,同时保持所有其他评估参数的值在合理范围内。在比较多个研究的结果或计算革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌之间的比值时,需要考虑到这些影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b4/6761292/d7f13b433abd/41598_2019_49520_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b4/6761292/16f83600952d/41598_2019_49520_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b4/6761292/a4af726aec38/41598_2019_49520_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b4/6761292/ee9b8c8f75b8/41598_2019_49520_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b4/6761292/db99e80355d0/41598_2019_49520_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b4/6761292/fb72d6ade9ae/41598_2019_49520_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b4/6761292/d7f13b433abd/41598_2019_49520_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b4/6761292/16f83600952d/41598_2019_49520_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b4/6761292/a4af726aec38/41598_2019_49520_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b4/6761292/ee9b8c8f75b8/41598_2019_49520_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b4/6761292/db99e80355d0/41598_2019_49520_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b4/6761292/fb72d6ade9ae/41598_2019_49520_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b4/6761292/d7f13b433abd/41598_2019_49520_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Stool sampling and DNA isolation kits affect DNA quality and bacterial composition following 16S rRNA gene sequencing using MiSeq Illumina platform.粪便采样和 DNA 提取试剂盒会影响使用 MiSeq Illumina 平台进行 16S rRNA 基因测序后的 DNA 质量和细菌组成。
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 25;9(1):13837. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49520-3.
2
Are all faecal bacteria detected with equal efficiency? A study using next-generation sequencing and quantitative culture of infants' faecal samples.所有粪便细菌的检测效率都一样吗?一项使用下一代测序和婴儿粪便样本定量培养的研究。
J Microbiol Methods. 2020 Oct;177:106018. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2020.106018. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
3
Comparative analysis of commercially available kits for optimal DNA extraction from bovine fecal samples.比较分析从牛粪便样本中提取 DNA 的商用试剂盒。
Arch Microbiol. 2024 Jun 20;206(7):314. doi: 10.1007/s00203-024-04047-8.
4
Analysis of Gut Microbiota in Patients with Parkinson's Disease.帕金森病患者肠道微生物群分析
Bull Exp Biol Med. 2017 Apr;162(6):734-737. doi: 10.1007/s10517-017-3700-7. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
5
Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studies.用于人类肠道微生物组研究的粪便 DNA 提取方案评估。
BMC Microbiol. 2020 Jul 17;20(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01894-5.
6
Differences in the gut microbiome composition of Korean children and adult samples based on different DNA isolation kits.基于不同 DNA 提取试剂盒的韩国儿童和成人样本肠道微生物组组成的差异。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 10;17(3):e0264291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264291. eCollection 2022.
7
An identification protocol for ESBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria bloodstream infections using a MinION nanopore sequencer.使用 MinION 纳米孔测序仪鉴定产 ESBL 革兰氏阴性菌血流感染的方法。
J Med Microbiol. 2019 Aug;68(8):1219-1226. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001024. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
8
Comparison of identification systems for psychrotrophic bacteria isolated from raw bovine milk.从生鲜牛乳中分离出的嗜冷菌鉴定系统的比较。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2014 Oct 17;189:26-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.07.023. Epub 2014 Jul 26.
9
16S rRNA gene sequencing and the routine clinical microbiology laboratory: a perfect marriage?16S核糖体RNA基因测序与临床微生物学常规实验室:完美结合?
J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Sep;44(9):3469-70. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01017-06.
10
Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform.细菌皮肤微生物群调查方法的优化:引物选择以及454平台与MiSeq平台的比较
BMC Microbiol. 2017 Jan 21;17(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12866-017-0927-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Interaction between the breast tumor microenvironment and gut microbiome.乳腺肿瘤微环境与肠道微生物群之间的相互作用。
Gut Microbes. 2025 Dec;17(1):2514136. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2025.2514136. Epub 2025 Jun 8.
2
Do we need a standardized 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing analysis protocol for poultry microbiota research?家禽微生物群研究是否需要标准化的16S rRNA基因扩增子测序分析方案?
Poult Sci. 2025 Jul;104(7):105242. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.105242. Epub 2025 May 1.
3
Comparison of Fecal DNA Extraction Kits for the Giant Panda () by Short Tandem Repeat Genotype Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Methodology challenges in studying human gut microbiota - effects of collection, storage, DNA extraction and next generation sequencing technologies.研究人类肠道微生物组的方法学挑战 - 采集、储存、DNA 提取和下一代测序技术的影响。
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 23;8(1):5143. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23296-4.
2
Comparison of DNA extraction methods for human gut microbial community profiling.比较用于人类肠道微生物群落分析的 DNA 提取方法。
Syst Appl Microbiol. 2018 Mar;41(2):151-157. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2017.11.008. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
3
Towards standards for human fecal sample processing in metagenomic studies.
通过短串联重复序列基因型分析比较大熊猫粪便DNA提取试剂盒()
Ecol Evol. 2025 Apr 8;15(4):e71242. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71242. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Advancements in analytical methods for studying the human gut microbiome.研究人类肠道微生物群的分析方法进展
J Biol Methods. 2024 Nov 18;12(1):e99010038. doi: 10.14440/jbm.2024.0050. eCollection 2025.
5
Using short-read 16S rRNA sequencing of multiple variable regions to generate high-quality results to a species level.使用多个可变区的短读长16S rRNA测序,以在物种水平上生成高质量结果。
Front Bioinform. 2025 Mar 17;5:1484113. doi: 10.3389/fbinf.2025.1484113. eCollection 2025.
6
Impact of antibiotic prophylaxis on gut microbiota in colorectal surgery: insights from an Eastern European stewardship study.抗生素预防对结直肠手术中肠道微生物群的影响:来自东欧管理研究的见解。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Jan 13;14:1468645. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1468645. eCollection 2024.
7
A Comparison of Three Automated Nucleic Acid Extraction Systems for Human Stool Samples.三种用于人类粪便样本的自动化核酸提取系统的比较
Microorganisms. 2024 Nov 25;12(12):2417. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12122417.
8
Protective effect of gut microbiota restored by fecal microbiota transplantation in a sepsis model in juvenile mice.粪菌移植重建肠道菌群对幼年脓毒症模型小鼠的保护作用。
Front Immunol. 2024 Oct 22;15:1451356. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1451356. eCollection 2024.
9
Optimization of the Method for Isolating Bacterial DNA from the Aboveground Part of Lettuce.从生菜地上部分提取细菌 DNA 的方法优化。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Aug 4;25(15):8513. doi: 10.3390/ijms25158513.
10
Impact of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis on the oral and fecal bacteriomes of children in the first week of life.产时抗生素预防对生命第一周儿童口腔和粪便细菌组的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 6;14(1):18163. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68953-z.
迈向宏基因组研究中人粪便样本处理的标准。
Nat Biotechnol. 2017 Nov;35(11):1069-1076. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3960. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
4
The gut microbiota: a major player in the toxicity of environmental pollutants?肠道微生物群:环境污染物毒性的主要影响因素?
NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2016 May 4;2:16003. doi: 10.1038/npjbiofilms.2016.3. eCollection 2016.
5
Gut microbiota dysbiosis associated with glucose metabolism disorders and the metabolic syndrome in older adults.老年人肠道微生物群失调与葡萄糖代谢紊乱及代谢综合征相关。
Benef Microbes. 2017 Aug 24;8(4):545-556. doi: 10.3920/BM2016.0184. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
6
Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research.优化微生物组研究方法和避免陷阱。
Microbiome. 2017 May 5;5(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0267-5.
7
Relationships between gut microbiota, plasma metabolites, and metabolic syndrome traits in the METSIM cohort.METSIM队列中肠道微生物群、血浆代谢物与代谢综合征特征之间的关系。
Genome Biol. 2017 Apr 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1194-2.
8
Antibiotic use in childhood alters the gut microbiota and predisposes to overweight.儿童期使用抗生素会改变肠道微生物群并易导致超重。
Microb Cell. 2016 Jun 20;3(7):296-298. doi: 10.15698/mic2016.07.514.
9
Impact of Different Fecal Processing Methods on Assessments of Bacterial Diversity in the Human Intestine.不同粪便处理方法对人体肠道细菌多样性评估的影响
Front Microbiol. 2016 Oct 20;7:1643. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01643. eCollection 2016.
10
Comparison of Collection Methods for Fecal Samples for Discovery Metabolomics in Epidemiologic Studies.流行病学研究中用于发现代谢组学的粪便样本采集方法比较
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Nov;25(11):1483-1490. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0409. Epub 2016 Aug 19.