Tournoy Kurt G, Adam Valerie, Muylle Inge, De Rijck Helene, Everaert Ellen, Eqlimi Ehsan, van Meerbeeck Jan P, Vercauter Piet
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Onze-Lieve Vrouw Ziekenhuis, 9300 Aalst, Belgium.
Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 27;15(15):3821. doi: 10.3390/cancers15153821.
For patients receiving therapy with curative or palliative intent for a thoracic malignancy, prediction of quality of life (QOL), once therapy starts, remains challenging. The role of health assessments by the patient instead of the doctor herein remains ill-defined.
To assess the evolution of QOL in patients with thoracic malignancies treated with curative and palliative intent, respectively. To identify factors that determine QOL one year after the start of cancer therapy. To identify factors that affect survival.
We prospectively included consecutive patients with a thoracic malignancy who were starting anti-cancer therapy and measured QOL with QLQ-C30 before the start of therapy, and thereafter at regular intervals for up to 12 months. A multivariate regression analysis of the global health score (GHS) and QOL summary scores (QSS) one year after the start of therapy was conducted. A proportional hazards Cox regression was conducted to investigate the effects of case-mix variables on survival.
Of 587 new patients, 375 started different forms of therapy. Most had non-small cell lung cancer ( = 298), 35 had small cell lung cancer, and 42 had other thoracic malignancies or were diagnosed on imaging alone. There were 203 who went for a curative intent and 172 for a palliative intent strategy. The WHO score of 0-1 was more prevalent in the former group ( = 0.02), and comorbidities were equally distributed. At baseline, all QOL indices were better in the curative group ( < 0.05). The curative group was characterized by a significant worsening of GHS and QSS ( < 0.05). The palliative group was characterized by an improvement in GHS and emotional health ( < 0.05), while other dimensions of functioning remained stable. GHS at 12 months was estimated in a multivariate linear regression model (R = 0.23- < 0.001) based on baseline GHS, QSS, and comorbidity burden. QSS at 12 months was estimated (R = 0.31- < 0.001) by baseline QSS and therapeutic intent strategy (curative vs. palliative). The prognostic factors for overall survival were the type of therapy (curative vs. palliative intent, < 0.001) and occurrence of early toxicity-related hospitalization (grade ≥ 3, = 0.001).
Patients with thoracic malignancies treated with curative intent experience a worsening of their QOL in the first year, whereas those receiving palliative anti-cancer therapy do not. QOL one year after the start of therapy depends on the baseline health scores as determined by the patient, comorbidity burden, and therapeutic strategy. Survival depends on therapeutic strategy and early hospitalization due to toxicity.
对于接受根治性或姑息性治疗的胸部恶性肿瘤患者,在治疗开始后预测其生活质量(QOL)仍然具有挑战性。在此过程中,由患者而非医生进行健康评估的作用仍不明确。
分别评估接受根治性和姑息性治疗的胸部恶性肿瘤患者的生活质量演变。确定癌症治疗开始一年后决定生活质量的因素。确定影响生存的因素。
我们前瞻性纳入了连续的开始抗癌治疗的胸部恶性肿瘤患者,并在治疗开始前用QLQ-C30测量生活质量,此后每隔一段时间测量一次,最长达12个月。对治疗开始一年后的总体健康评分(GHS)和生活质量总结评分(QSS)进行多变量回归分析。进行比例风险Cox回归以研究病例组合变量对生存的影响。
在587名新患者中,375名开始了不同形式的治疗。大多数患有非小细胞肺癌(=298),35名患有小细胞肺癌,42名患有其他胸部恶性肿瘤或仅通过影像学诊断。有203名患者采取根治性治疗意图,172名采取姑息性治疗意图策略。前者组中WHO评分为0 - 1更为常见(=0.02),合并症分布均匀。在基线时,根治性治疗组的所有生活质量指标均更好(<0.05)。根治性治疗组的特点是GHS和QSS显著恶化(<0.05)。姑息性治疗组的特点是GHS和情绪健康有所改善(<0.05),而其他功能维度保持稳定。在基于基线GHS、QSS和合并症负担的多变量线性回归模型中估计了12个月时的GHS(R = 0.23 - <0.001)。通过基线QSS和治疗意图策略(根治性与姑息性)估计了12个月时的QSS(R = 0.31 - <0.001)。总体生存的预后因素是治疗类型(根治性与姑息性意图,<0.001)和早期毒性相关住院的发生(≥3级,=0.001)。
接受根治性治疗的胸部恶性肿瘤患者在第一年生活质量恶化,而接受姑息性抗癌治疗的患者则不然。治疗开始一年后的生活质量取决于患者确定的基线健康评分、合并症负担和治疗策略。生存取决于治疗策略和因毒性导致的早期住院情况。