Ohashi Hirofumi, Collison Damien, Mizukami Takuya, Didagelos Matthaios, Sakai Koshiro, Aetesam-Ur-Rahman Muhammad, Munhoz Daniel, McCartney Peter, Ford Thomas J, Lindsay Mitchell, Shaukat Aadil, Rocchiccioli Paul, Brogan Richard, Watkins Stuart, McEntegart Margaret, Good Richard, Robertson Keith, O'Boyle Patrick, Davie Andrew, Khan Adnan, Hood Stuart, Eteiba Hany, Amano Tetsuya, Sonck Jeroen, Berry Colin, De Bruyne Bernard, Oldroyd Keith G, Collet Carlos
Cardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, 9300 Aalst, Belgium.
Department of Cardiology, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute 480-1195, Japan.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 7;13(15):2612. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13152612.
Assessing coronary physiology after stent implantation facilitates the optimisation of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Coronary artery disease (CAD) patterns can be characterised by the pullback pressure gradient (PPG) index. The impact of focal vs. diffuse disease on physiology-guided incremental optimisation strategy (PIOS) is unknown. This is a sub-study of the TARGET-FFR randomized clinical trial (NCT03259815). The study protocol directed that optimisation be attempted for patients in the PIOS arm when post-PCI FFR was <0.90. Overall, 114 patients ( = 61 PIOS and 53 controls) with both pre-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR) pullbacks and post-PCI FFR were included. A PPG ≥ 0.74 defined focal CAD. The PPG correlated significantly with post-PCI FFR (r = 0.43; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.57; -value < 0.001) and normalised delta FFR (r = 0.49; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.62; -value < 0.001). PIOS was more frequently applied to vessels with diffuse CAD (6% focal vs. 42% diffuse; -value = 0.006). In patients randomized to PIOS, those with focal disease achieved higher post-PCI FFR than patients with diffuse CAD (0.93 ± 0.05 vs. 0.83 ± 0.07, < 0.001). There was a significant interaction between CAD patterns and the randomisation arm for post-PCI FFR (-value for interaction = 0.004). Physiology-guided stent optimisation was applied more frequently to vessels with diffuse disease; however, patients with focal CAD at baseline achieved higher post-PCI FFR.
评估支架植入后的冠状动脉生理学有助于优化经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)。冠状动脉疾病(CAD)模式可通过回撤压力梯度(PPG)指数来表征。局灶性病变与弥漫性病变对生理学指导的增量优化策略(PIOS)的影响尚不清楚。这是TARGET-FFR随机临床试验(NCT03259815)的一项子研究。研究方案指示,当PCI术后血流储备分数(FFR)<0.90时,对PIOS组的患者尝试进行优化。总体而言,纳入了114例患者(n = 61例PIOS组和53例对照组),这些患者既有PCI术前的血流储备分数(FFR)回撤,也有PCI术后的FFR。PPG≥0.74定义为局灶性CAD。PPG与PCI术后FFR显著相关(r = 0.43;95%CI 0.26至0.57;P值<0.001)以及标准化FFR变化量(r = 0.49;95%CI 0.34至0.62;P值<0.001)。PIOS更频繁地应用于弥漫性CAD的血管(局灶性6% vs.弥漫性42%;P值 = 0.006)。在随机分配到PIOS组的患者中,局灶性病变患者的PCI术后FFR高于弥漫性CAD患者(0.93±0.05 vs. 0.83±0.07,P<0.001)。CAD模式与随机分组对PCI术后FFR存在显著交互作用(交互作用P值 = 0.004)。生理学指导的支架优化更频繁地应用于弥漫性病变的血管;然而,基线时局灶性CAD患者的PCI术后FFR更高。