Jeong Juhyun, Ham Sungwon, Seo Bo Kyoung, Lee Jeong Taek, Wang Shuncong, Bae Min Sun, Cho Kyu Ran, Woo Ok Hee, Song Sung Eun, Choi Hangseok
Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 123 Jeokgeum-Ro, Danwon-Gu, Ansan City, 15355, Gyeonggi-Do, Korea.
Healthcare Readiness Institute for Unified Korea, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Republic of Korea.
Radiol Med. 2025 Mar;130(3):368-380. doi: 10.1007/s11547-025-01956-6. Epub 2025 Jan 25.
To compare the performance of ultrafast MRI with standard MRI in classifying histological factors and subtypes of invasive breast cancer among radiologists with varying experience.
From October 2021 to November 2022, this prospective study enrolled 225 participants with 233 breast cancers before treatment (NCT06104189 at clinicaltrials.gov). Tumor segmentation on MRI was performed independently by two readers (R1, dedicated breast radiologist; R2, radiology resident). We extracted 1618 radiomic features and four kinetic features from ultrafast and standard images, respectively. Logistic regression algorithms were adopted for prediction modeling, following feature selection by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. The performance of predicting histological factors and subtypes was evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC). Performance differences between MRI methods and radiologists were assessed using the DeLong test.
Ultrafast MRI outperformed standard MRI in predicting HER2 status (AUCs [95% CI] of ultrafast MRI vs standard MRI; 0.87 [0.83-0.91] vs 0.77 [0.64-0.90] for R1 and 0.88 [0.83-0.91] vs 0.77 [0.69-0.84] for R2) (all P < 0.05). Both ultrafast MRI and standard MRI showed comparable performance in predicting hormone receptors. Ultrafast MRI exhibited superior performance to standard MRI in classifying subtypes. The classification of the luminal subtype for both readers, the HER2-overexpressed subtype for R2, and the triple-negative subtype for R1 was significantly better with ultrafast MRI (P < 0.05).
Ultrafast MRI-based radiomics holds promise as a noninvasive imaging biomarker for classifying hormone receptors, HER2 status, and molecular subtypes compared to standard MRI, regardless of radiologist experience.
比较超快磁共振成像(MRI)与标准MRI在不同经验的放射科医生对浸润性乳腺癌的组织学因素和亚型进行分类方面的表现。
2021年10月至2022年11月,这项前瞻性研究纳入了225名患有233例治疗前乳腺癌的参与者(clinicaltrials.gov上的NCT06104189)。MRI肿瘤分割由两名阅片者独立完成(R1,乳腺专科放射科医生;R2,放射科住院医师)。我们分别从超快和标准图像中提取了1618个影像组学特征和四个动力学特征。在通过最小绝对收缩和选择算子进行特征选择后,采用逻辑回归算法进行预测建模。使用受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估预测组织学因素和亚型的表现。使用德龙检验评估MRI方法和放射科医生之间的表现差异。
在预测HER2状态方面,超快MRI优于标准MRI(超快MRI与标准MRI的AUCs[95%CI];R1为0.87[0.83 - 0.91]对0.77[0.64 - 0.90],R2为0.