• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年轻成年人的抑郁评估:Teate 抑郁量表英文版的初步开发。

Measuring Depression in Young Adults: Preliminary Development of an English Version of the Teate Depression Inventory.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Studies in Education and Human Development, College of Education, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.

Division of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 28;20(15):6470. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20156470.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20156470
PMID:37569012
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10418789/
Abstract

Depression is a common and debilitating condition that impacts individuals with various cultural backgrounds, medical conditions, and life circumstances. Thus, assessment tools need to be useful among different cultural groups. The 21-item Teate Depression Inventory (TDI) was developed in Italy, is designed to assess major depression, and focuses on cognitive and affective rather than somatic symptoms. This study aims to examine the factor structure and concurrent validity of the TDI English version among a non-clinical population in the United States. Participants included 398 adults (mean age 19.89 years, SD = 2.72, range: 18 to 46 years old) who completed the TDI and The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale-Revised (CESD-R). The results supported a three-factor bifactor structure of the TDI (Positive Affect, Negative Affect, and Daily Functioning), which largely corresponds to the Tripartite Model of affective disorders. These findings support the use of TDI scores as measures of depressive symptoms among U.S. young adults, offering researchers and practitioners a brief and useful tool.

摘要

抑郁是一种常见且使人虚弱的状况,影响着具有不同文化背景、医疗状况和生活环境的个体。因此,评估工具需要在不同的文化群体中都有效。21 项 Teate 抑郁量表(TDI)由意大利开发,旨在评估重度抑郁,重点关注认知和情感症状,而不是躯体症状。本研究旨在检验 TDI 英文版本在美国非临床人群中的因子结构和同时效度。参与者包括 398 名成年人(平均年龄 19.89 岁,标准差 = 2.72,范围:18 至 46 岁),他们完成了 TDI 和流行病学研究中心抑郁量表修订版(CESD-R)。结果支持 TDI 的三因素双因素结构(积极情绪、消极情绪和日常功能),这在很大程度上与情感障碍的三分模型相对应。这些发现支持在美国家庭使用 TDI 分数作为评估年轻人抑郁症状的指标,为研究人员和从业者提供了一种简洁有用的工具。

相似文献

1
Measuring Depression in Young Adults: Preliminary Development of an English Version of the Teate Depression Inventory.年轻成年人的抑郁评估:Teate 抑郁量表英文版的初步开发。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 28;20(15):6470. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20156470.
2
Psychometric Properties and Factor Structures of the Korean Version of Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised.儿童抑郁评定量表修订版韩文版的心理测量特性与因子结构
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2018 May;28(4):285-292. doi: 10.1089/cap.2016.0183. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
3
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale-Revised in patients with cancer: A cross-sectional study.中文版流行病学研究抑郁量表修订版在癌症患者中的心理计量特性:一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Sep;97:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
4
Response Time as an Implicit Self-Schema Indicator for Depression Among Undergraduate Students: Preliminary Findings From a Mobile App-Based Depression Assessment.反应时间作为大学生抑郁的内隐自我图式指标:基于移动应用的抑郁评估的初步发现。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Sep 13;7(9):e14657. doi: 10.2196/14657.
5
Validation of the Brazilian brief version of the temperament auto-questionnaire TEMPS-A: the brief TEMPS-Rio de Janeiro.验证 TEMPS-A 气质自动问卷的巴西简版:里约热内卢简版 TEMPS。
J Affect Disord. 2011 Nov;134(1-3):65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.02.005. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
6
Tailored Screening for Late-Life Depression: A Short Version of the Teate Depression Inventory (TDI-E).老年期抑郁症的个性化筛查:Teate 抑郁量表简版(TDI-E)
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 5;10:2693. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02693. eCollection 2019.
7
Validity of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale in Type 2 diabetes.流行病学研究中心抑郁量表在2型糖尿病中的效度
J Psychosom Res. 2016 Nov;90:91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.09.013. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
8
[Psychometric approach of metacognition: Pilot study in clinical population].[元认知的心理测量方法:临床人群的初步研究]
Encephale. 2017 Apr;43(2):120-127. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
9
The Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire for Depression in Youth: A Cross-Cultural Perspective.《青少年抑郁情绪问卷(韩文版)的信度和效度:跨文化视角》。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2021 Jun;52(3):399-408. doi: 10.1007/s10578-020-01026-0.
10
Reliability and validity of a self-report scale for daily assessments of the severity of depressive symptoms.用于日常评估抑郁症状严重程度的自报量表的信度和效度。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Dec;270:581-586. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors of the antenatal depression in a sample of Italian pregnant women: a preliminary study.意大利孕妇产前抑郁的风险因素:一项初步研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Oct 21;24(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06704-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychological factors in adherence to COVID-19 public health restrictions in Italy: A path model testing depressed mood, anxiety, and co-rumination via cellphone.意大利 COVID-19 公共卫生限制措施依从性的心理因素:通过手机测试抑郁情绪、焦虑和共沉思的路径模型。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 2;17(12):e0278628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278628. eCollection 2022.
2
Demographic and Attitudinal Factors of Adherence to Quarantine Guidelines During COVID-19: The Italian Model.新冠疫情期间遵守隔离指南的人口统计学和态度因素:意大利模式
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 21;11:559288. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.559288. eCollection 2020.
3
Italians on the Age of COVID-19: The Self-Reported Depressive Symptoms Through Web-Based Survey.
意大利人在新冠疫情时代:通过网络调查自我报告的抑郁症状
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 16;11:569276. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569276. eCollection 2020.
4
Tailored Screening for Late-Life Depression: A Short Version of the Teate Depression Inventory (TDI-E).老年期抑郁症的个性化筛查:Teate 抑郁量表简版(TDI-E)
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 5;10:2693. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02693. eCollection 2019.
5
Measurement equivalence: A non-technical primer on categorical multi-group confirmatory factor analysis in school psychology.测量等效性:学校心理学中类别多群组验证性因子分析的非技术性入门
J Sch Psychol. 2017 Feb;60:65-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2016.11.002. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
6
The Mediating Role of Early Maladaptive Schemas in the Relation between Co-Rumination and Depression in Young Adults.早期适应不良图式在青少年共同反刍与抑郁关系中的中介作用
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 21;10(10):e0140177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140177. eCollection 2015.
7
Measuring anxiety in the elderly: psychometric properties of the state trait inventory of cognitive and somatic anxiety (STICSA) in an elderly Italian sample.测量老年人的焦虑:意大利老年样本中认知与躯体焦虑状态特质量表(STICSA)的心理测量特性
Int Psychogeriatr. 2015 Jun;27(6):999-1008. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214002634. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
8
Differentiating maternal fatigue and depressive symptoms at six months and four years post partum: Considerations for assessment, diagnosis and intervention.产后六个月和四年时区分产妇疲劳与抑郁症状:评估、诊断及干预的考量因素
Midwifery. 2015 Feb;31(2):316-22. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.09.005. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
9
Measurement of external shame: an inside view.外在羞耻感的测量:一种内在视角。
J Pers Assess. 2015;97(1):81-9. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2014.947650. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
10
Determining a diagnostic cut-off on the Teate Depression Inventory.确定 Teate 抑郁量表的诊断截断值。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014 Jun 3;10:987-95. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S55706. eCollection 2014.