University of "G. d'Annunzio" Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Washington and Lee University, Lexington, Virginia, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 2;17(12):e0278628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278628. eCollection 2022.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the success of major non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as quarantine orders, has depended upon robust rates of citizens' adherence to protocols. Thus, it is critical to public health for research to illuminate factors that affect compliance with contagion-mitigating practices. Previous research has examined sociodemographic factors and aspects of psychological distress as correlates of adherence to public health guidelines. The current study expanded this research to investigate the psychosocial process of co-rumination, which has been identified in previous research as a maladaptive type of social interaction that is associated with elevated levels of anxiety and depression. Data were collected from 932 Italian adults during the initial stages of the highly stressful COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown. A path model was tested to examine multivariate relationships among sociodemographic characteristics, symptoms of psychological distress (i.e., depression and anxiety), co-rumination via cellphone, and self-reported adherence to COVID-19-related public health restrictions. Results revealed that higher rates of co-rumination via cellphone were associated with lower levels of adherence to public health restrictions. Symptoms of depression and anxiety were differentially related to co-rumination processes and adherence to public health restrictions. Higher levels of depression symptoms were directly associated with poorer adherence to public health restrictions, and this path was mediated through higher levels of co-rumination via cellphone. On the contrary, higher levels of state anxiety were directly associated with greater adherence to public health guidelines. This path was also mediated through co-rumination via cellphone. Higher levels of anxiety were correlated with lower levels of co-rumination, which in turn were correlated with lower levels of adherence. These results suggest fruitful directions for future research examining co-rumination as a maladaptive coping behavior that may be addressed within public health interventions.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,检疫令等主要非药物干预措施的成功实施取决于公民对协议的高度遵守。因此,研究揭示影响传染病缓解实践遵从性的因素对公共卫生至关重要。先前的研究已经检验了社会人口因素和心理困扰方面的因素,这些因素与遵守公共卫生指南有关。本研究扩展了这一研究,以调查共沉思的心理社会过程,先前的研究已经确定共沉思是一种适应不良的社交互动类型,与焦虑和抑郁水平升高有关。在 COVID-19 大流行和封锁的初期,从 932 名意大利成年人那里收集了数据。测试了一个路径模型,以检验社会人口特征、心理困扰症状(即抑郁和焦虑)、通过手机进行共沉思与自我报告的 COVID-19 相关公共卫生限制遵守之间的多元关系。结果表明,通过手机进行共沉思的频率越高,遵守公共卫生限制的程度越低。抑郁和焦虑症状与共沉思过程和遵守公共卫生限制的程度存在差异。较高的抑郁症状水平与较差的公共卫生限制遵守程度直接相关,而这一途径是通过通过手机进行共沉思的更高水平来介导的。相反,较高的状态焦虑水平与更好地遵守公共卫生准则直接相关。这条路径也通过通过手机进行共沉思来介导。较高的焦虑水平与共沉思水平较低相关,而共沉思水平较低又与遵守程度较低相关。这些结果表明,在未来的研究中,共沉思作为一种适应不良的应对行为进行研究具有很大的意义,这可能是公共卫生干预措施中需要解决的问题。