Walters James Kenneth, Sharma Anurag, Harrison Reema
NSW Ministry of Health, Level 9, 1 Reserve Rd, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia.
School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW, Kensington Campus, Level 2, Samuels Building (F25), Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 31;11(15):2177. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11152177.
As demand for healthcare continues to grow, public health systems are increasingly required to drive efficiency improvement (EI) to address public service funding challenges. Despite this requirement, evidence of EI strategies that have been successful applied at the whole-of-system level is limited. This study reports the development, implementation and evaluation of a novel taxonomy of EI strategies used in public health systems to inform systemwide EI models.
The public health system in New South Wales, Australia, operates a centralised EI model statewide and was the setting for this study. An audit of EI strategies implemented in the NSW Health system between July 2016 and June 2019 was used to identify all available EI strategies within the study timeframe. A content management approach was applied to audit the strategies, with each strategy coded to an EI focus area. Codes were clustered according to similarity, and category names were assigned to each cluster to form a preliminary taxonomy. Each category was defined and examples were provided. The resulting taxonomy was distributed and evaluated by user feedback survey and pre-post study to assess the impact on EI strategy distribution.
A total of 1127 EI strategies were identified and coded into 263 unique strategies, which were clustered into nine categories to form the taxonomy of EI strategies. Categories included the following: non-clinical contracts and supplies; avoided and preventable activity; clinical service delivery and patient outcomes; finance and operations; recruitment, vacancies and FTE; staffing models; leave management; staff engagement and development; premium staffing; and clinical contracts and supplies. Evaluative findings revealed a perceived reduction in the duplication of EI work, improved access to EI knowledge and improved engagement with EI processes when using the taxonomy. The taxonomy was also associated with wider use of EI strategies.
Whole-of-system EI is an increasing requirement. Using a taxonomy to guide systemwide practice appears to be advanta-geous in reducing duplication and guiding practice, with implications for use in health systems internationally.
随着医疗保健需求持续增长,公共卫生系统越来越需要提高效率以应对公共服务资金挑战。尽管有此要求,但在全系统层面成功应用的效率提升(EI)策略的证据有限。本研究报告了一种用于公共卫生系统的新型EI策略分类法的开发、实施和评估,以为全系统的EI模型提供参考。
澳大利亚新南威尔士州的公共卫生系统在全州范围内运行集中式EI模型,本研究以此为背景。对2016年7月至2019年6月在新南威尔士州卫生系统实施的EI策略进行审计,以确定研究时间段内所有可用的EI策略。采用内容管理方法对策略进行审计,每个策略被编码到一个EI重点领域。根据相似性对代码进行聚类,并为每个聚类分配类别名称以形成初步分类法。对每个类别进行定义并提供示例。通过用户反馈调查和前后研究对生成的分类法进行分发和评估,以评估其对EI策略分布的影响。
共识别出1127项EI策略并编码为263项独特策略,这些策略被聚类为九个类别,形成了EI策略分类法。类别包括:非临床合同与供应;避免和可预防的活动;临床服务提供与患者结果;财务与运营;招聘、空缺与全时当量;人员配置模式;休假管理;员工参与与发展;高级人员配置;以及临床合同与供应。评估结果显示,使用该分类法时,EI工作的重复现象明显减少,EI知识的获取得到改善,对EI流程的参与度也有所提高。该分类法还与EI策略的更广泛使用相关。
全系统的EI要求日益提高。使用分类法来指导全系统实践似乎有利于减少重复并指导实践,对国际卫生系统的应用具有启示意义。