• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗化疗作为不可切除恶性胸膜间皮瘤一线治疗的成本效益分析

Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus ipilimumab chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma.

作者信息

Yang Liu, Cao Xueqiong, Li Na, Zheng Bin, Liu Maobai, Cai Hongfu

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.

Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Xinquan Road 29, Fuzhou 350100, China.

出版信息

Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022 Aug 3;14:17588359221116604. doi: 10.1177/17588359221116604. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1177/17588359221116604
PMID:35958872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9358333/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NI) pemetrexed plus cisplatin/carboplatin (C) as the first-line treatment for unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) from the perspective of US payers.

METHODS

A 10-year partitioned survival model was constructed using survival and safety data from the CheckMate 743 clinical trial. The output metrics of the model included the patient's lifetime quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Only direct medical costs were considered. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

Among all randomized patients, group NI had an ICER of $475,677/QALY relative to group C. Among patients with epithelioid histology, group NI had an ICER of $760,955/QALY. Among patients with non-epithelioid histology, group NI had an ICER of $418,348/QALY. The ICERs of all three populations exceeded the willingness-to-pay threshold ($150,000). The results of one-way sensitivity analysis revealed that the cost of nivolumab had a great influence on the results. The results of probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the possibility of NI being more economical in all randomized patients and in patients with non-epidemiology histology was 0. In patients with epithelioid histology, the probability that NI had an economic advantage was 0.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

From the perspective of US payers, in patients with unresectable MPM, NI has no economic advantage over C.

摘要

引言

本研究从美国医保支付方的角度评估了纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗(NI)与培美曲塞联合顺铂/卡铂(C)作为不可切除恶性胸膜间皮瘤(MPM)一线治疗方案的成本效益。

方法

利用CheckMate 743临床试验的生存和安全性数据构建了一个10年的分段生存模型。该模型的输出指标包括患者的终身质量调整生命年(QALY)、终身成本和增量成本效益比(ICER)。仅考虑直接医疗成本。进行了单向和概率敏感性分析以评估结果的稳健性。

结果

在所有随机分组的患者中,相对于C组,NI组的ICER为475,677美元/QALY。在组织学类型为上皮样的患者中,NI组的ICER为760,955美元/QALY。在组织学类型为非上皮样的患者中,NI组的ICER为418,348美元/QALY。所有这三类人群的ICER均超过了支付意愿阈值(150,000美元)。单向敏感性分析结果显示,纳武利尤单抗的成本对结果有很大影响。概率敏感性分析结果表明,NI在所有随机分组患者和非上皮样组织学类型患者中更具经济性的可能性为0。在上皮样组织学类型的患者中,NI具有经济优势的概率为0.6%。

结论

从美国医保支付方的角度来看,在不可切除的MPM患者中,NI相对于C没有经济优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f567/9358333/cbb252c4eb94/10.1177_17588359221116604-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f567/9358333/70dfd8565f60/10.1177_17588359221116604-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f567/9358333/1665d34883d4/10.1177_17588359221116604-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f567/9358333/a2db90d5e67a/10.1177_17588359221116604-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f567/9358333/b70d8872a7c0/10.1177_17588359221116604-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f567/9358333/c7e2881b93e9/10.1177_17588359221116604-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f567/9358333/dfcb7ec65c5a/10.1177_17588359221116604-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f567/9358333/cbb252c4eb94/10.1177_17588359221116604-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f567/9358333/70dfd8565f60/10.1177_17588359221116604-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f567/9358333/1665d34883d4/10.1177_17588359221116604-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f567/9358333/a2db90d5e67a/10.1177_17588359221116604-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f567/9358333/b70d8872a7c0/10.1177_17588359221116604-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f567/9358333/c7e2881b93e9/10.1177_17588359221116604-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f567/9358333/dfcb7ec65c5a/10.1177_17588359221116604-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f567/9358333/cbb252c4eb94/10.1177_17588359221116604-fig7.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus ipilimumab chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma.纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗化疗作为不可切除恶性胸膜间皮瘤一线治疗的成本效益分析
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022 Aug 3;14:17588359221116604. doi: 10.1177/17588359221116604. eCollection 2022.
2
First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab for unresectable MPM in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.中国不可切除性 MPM 的一线纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗:成本效果分析。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023 Oct 16;18(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02925-w.
3
Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line treatment for American patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma.尼伏鲁单抗联合伊匹单抗作为不可切除恶性胸膜间皮瘤美国患者一线治疗的成本效益。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 22;10:947375. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.947375. eCollection 2022.
4
Cost Effectiveness and Budget Impact of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Platinum Plus Pemetrexed (with and Without Bevacizumab) in Patients with Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in Switzerland.瑞士不可切除恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者中纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗与铂类加培美曲塞(含或不含贝伐珠单抗)的成本效果和预算影响。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Dec;41(12):1641-1655. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01305-3. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
5
First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab or chemotherapy chemotherapy alone for advanced esophageal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.一线纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗或单纯化疗用于晚期食管癌的成本效益分析
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022 Sep 16;14:17588359221122733. doi: 10.1177/17588359221122733. eCollection 2022.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab combination therapy in the first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma.纳武单抗联合疗法用于晚期食管鳞状细胞癌一线治疗的成本效益分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 22;12:899966. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.899966. eCollection 2022.
7
Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus the EXTREME regimen in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a cost-effectiveness analysis.纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗对比 EXTREME 方案治疗复发性/转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌的成本效果分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 21;14(1):6807. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57277-7.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of additional bevacizumab to pemetrexed plus cisplatin for malignant pleural mesothelioma based on the MAPS trial.基于MAPS试验对培美曲塞联合顺铂方案加用贝伐单抗治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤的成本效益分析。
Lung Cancer. 2017 Aug;110:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 May 12.
9
Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗对比化疗作为晚期非小细胞肺癌一线治疗的成本效益
Int Immunopharmacol. 2023 Jan;114:109589. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109589. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
10
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的成本效益分析
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Aug 23;12:580459. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.580459. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in untreated advanced pleural mesothelioma in the Chinese healthcare system.在中国医疗体系中,帕博利珠单抗联合化疗与单纯化疗用于初治晚期胸膜间皮瘤的成本效益分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jan 7;15:1402423. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1402423. eCollection 2024.
2
Pleural mesothelioma (PMe): The evolving molecular knowledge of a rare and aggressive cancer.胸膜间皮瘤(PMe):一种罕见且侵袭性癌症的不断发展的分子知识。
Mol Oncol. 2024 Apr;18(4):797-814. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.13591. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab versus placebo for relapsed malignant mesothelioma.

本文引用的文献

1
United States Life Tables, 2019.美国生命表,2019 年。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2022 Mar;70(19):1-59.
2
First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy in patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma: 3-year outcomes from CheckMate 743.一线纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗与化疗治疗不可切除恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者:CheckMate 743研究的3年结果
Ann Oncol. 2022 May;33(5):488-499. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.01.074. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
3
Malignant pleural mesothelioma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.
尼伏单抗对比安慰剂治疗复发性恶性间皮瘤的成本效果分析。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Feb;46(1):158-165. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01662-1. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
4
Cost Effectiveness and Budget Impact of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Platinum Plus Pemetrexed (with and Without Bevacizumab) in Patients with Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in Switzerland.瑞士不可切除恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者中纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗与铂类加培美曲塞(含或不含贝伐珠单抗)的成本效果和预算影响。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Dec;41(12):1641-1655. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01305-3. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
5
ATG5 as biomarker for early detection of malignant mesothelioma.ATG5 作为恶性间皮瘤早期检测的生物标志物。
BMC Res Notes. 2023 Apr 24;16(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13104-023-06330-1.
6
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.恶性胸膜间皮瘤中的免疫检查点抑制剂:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 9;14(24):6063. doi: 10.3390/cancers14246063.
7
Analysis of new treatments proposed for malignant pleural mesothelioma raises concerns about the conduction of clinical trials in oncology.对恶性胸膜间皮瘤提出的新治疗方法的分析引发了人们对肿瘤学临床试验实施的担忧。
J Transl Med. 2022 Dec 13;20(1):593. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03744-6.
8
The STING agonist, DMXAA, reduces tumor vessels and enhances mesothelioma tumor antigen presentation yet blunts cytotoxic T cell function in a murine model.STING 激动剂 DMXAA 减少肿瘤血管并增强间皮瘤肿瘤抗原呈递,但在小鼠模型中削弱细胞毒性 T 细胞功能。
Front Immunol. 2022 Nov 18;13:969678. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.969678. eCollection 2022.
恶性胸膜间皮瘤:ESMO诊断、治疗及随访临床实践指南
Ann Oncol. 2022 Feb;33(2):129-142. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.11.005. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
4
Efficiency of fine scale and spatial regression in modelling associations between healthcare service spatial accessibility and their utilization.精细尺度和空间回归在建模医疗服务空间可达性与其利用之间的关联中的效率。
Int J Health Geogr. 2021 May 19;20(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12942-021-00276-y.
5
Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-Minimization Analysis of Continuous Infusion of Low-Dose Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.低剂量吉西他滨联合顺铂持续输注治疗不可切除恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者的疗效、安全性及成本最小化分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Apr 20;11:641975. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.641975. eCollection 2021.
6
Cost-effectiveness of Nivolumab-Ipilimumab Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的成本效果分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e218787. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8787.
7
First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (CheckMate 743): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.一线纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗治疗不可切除恶性胸膜间皮瘤(CheckMate 743):一项多中心、随机、开放标签、III 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2021 Jan 30;397(10272):375-386. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32714-8. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
8
Cost-Utility Analysis of a Dolutegravir-Based Versus Low-Dose Efavirenz-Based Regimen for the Initial Treatment of HIV-Infected Patients in Cameroon (NAMSAL ANRS 12313 Trial).喀麦隆(NAMSAL ANRS 12313 试验)初治 HIV 感染患者使用多替拉韦方案与低剂量依非韦伦方案的成本效用分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Mar;39(3):331-343. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00987-3. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
9
ERS/ESTS/EACTS/ESTRO guidelines for the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma.ERS/ESTS/EACTS/ESTRO 恶性胸膜间皮瘤管理指南
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jul 1;58(1):1-24. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa158.
10
First-line atezolizumab in addition to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy for metastatic, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: A United States-based cost-effectiveness analysis.贝伐珠单抗联合化疗基础上加用一线阿替利珠单抗治疗转移性非鳞状非小细胞肺癌:一项基于美国的成本效益分析。
Cancer. 2019 Oct 15;125(20):3526-3534. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32368. Epub 2019 Jul 9.