Nutritional Sciences Program, Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Raitt Hall 305, Box 353410, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Nesbitt Hall, 3215 Market St., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Sep;333:116141. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116141. Epub 2023 Aug 6.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between county- and state-level immigrant criminalizing and integrating policies and Latino household participation in the largest safety net program against food insecurity in the U.S., the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Our outcome, county-level proportion of SNAP-participating Latino households, and county-level covariates were obtained from the American Community Survey 1-year county files (N = 675 counties) for 13 years (2007-2019). Our exposures were county-level presence of sanctuary policies and a state-level immigrant friendliness score, created based on 19 immigrant criminalizing and integrating state-level policies obtained from the Urban Institute's State Immigration Policies Resource. We classified every county in the sample as 1) sanctuary policy + immigrant friendly state, 2) sanctuary policy + immigrant unfriendly state, 3) no sanctuary policy + immigrant friendly state, and 4) no sanctuary policy + immigrant unfriendly state. Using multivariable generalized linear models that adjusted for poverty levels and other social composition characteristics of counties, we found that county-level SNAP participation among Latino households was 1.1 percentage-point higher in counties with sanctuary policies (B = 1.12, 95%CI = 0.26-1.98), compared to counties with no sanctuary policies, and 1.6 percentage-point higher in counties with sanctuary policies in immigrant friendly states (B = 1.59, 95%CI = 0.33-2.84), compared to counties with no sanctuary policy in immigrant unfriendly states. Local and state immigration policy, even when unrelated to SNAP eligibility, may influence SNAP participation among Latino households. Jurisdictions which lack sanctuary policies or have more criminalizing and less integrating policies should consider adopting targeted outreach strategies to increase SNAP enrollment among Latino households.
这项研究的目的是调查县和州一级的移民刑事化和融合政策与拉丁裔家庭参与美国最大的反食品不安全保障计划(补充营养援助计划,SNAP)之间的关联。我们的结果,即县一级参与 SNAP 的拉丁裔家庭的比例,以及县一级的协变量,是从美国社区调查 1 年县档案(N=675 个县)中获得的,时间跨度为 13 年(2007-2019 年)。我们的暴露因素是县一级的庇护政策和一个州一级的移民友好度得分,这些得分是根据城市研究所的 19 项移民刑事化和融合州一级政策创建的。我们将样本中的每个县分为以下 4 类:1)庇护政策+移民友好州,2)庇护政策+移民不友好州,3)无庇护政策+移民友好州,4)无庇护政策+移民不友好州。我们使用多变量广义线性模型,对各县的贫困水平和其他社会构成特征进行了调整,发现与没有庇护政策的县相比,有庇护政策的县拉丁裔家庭参与 SNAP 的比例高 1.1 个百分点(B=1.12,95%置信区间为 0.26-1.98),与没有庇护政策的移民不友好州相比,有庇护政策的移民友好州的县拉丁裔家庭参与 SNAP 的比例高 1.6 个百分点(B=1.59,95%置信区间为 0.33-2.84)。即使与 SNAP 的资格无关,地方和州的移民政策也可能影响拉丁裔家庭参与 SNAP。缺乏庇护政策或有更多刑事化和更少融合政策的司法管辖区应考虑采取有针对性的外展策略,以增加拉丁裔家庭对 SNAP 的参与度。