1Department of Nutrition Science,Purdue University,700 W.State Street,West Lafayette,IN 47907-2059,USA.
3Health and Human Sciences Cooperative Extension,Purdue University,West Lafayette,IN,USA.
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Apr;21(5):957-966. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017003391. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
To investigate the association of policy, systems and environmental factors with improvement in household food security among low-income Indiana households with children after a Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education (SNAP-Ed) direct nutrition education intervention.
Household food security scores measured by the eighteen-item US Household Food Security Survey Module in a longitudinal randomized and controlled SNAP-Ed intervention study conducted from August 2013 to April 2015 were the response variable. Metrics to quantify environmental factors including classification of urban or rural county status; the number of SNAP-authorized stores, food pantries and recreational facilities; average fair market housing rental price; and natural amenity rank were collected from government websites and data sets covering the years 2012-2016 and used as covariates in mixed multiple linear regression modelling.
Thirty-seven Indiana counties, USA, 2012-2016.
SNAP-Ed eligible adults from households with children (n 328).
None of the environmental factors investigated were significantly associated with changes in household food security in this exploratory study.
SNAP-Ed improves food security regardless of urban or rural location or the environmental factors investigated. Expansion of SNAP-Ed in rural areas may support food access among the low-income population and reduce the prevalence of food insecurity in rural compared with urban areas. Further investigation into policy, systems and environmental factors of the Social Ecological Model are warranted to better understand their relationship with direct SNAP-Ed and their impact on diet-related behaviours and food security.
调查政策、制度和环境因素与印第安纳州低收入家庭儿童在接受补充营养援助计划教育(SNAP-Ed)直接营养教育干预后家庭粮食安全状况改善之间的关联。
在 2013 年 8 月至 2015 年 4 月期间进行的一项纵向随机对照 SNAP-Ed 干预研究中,使用美国家庭粮食安全调查模块的十八项指标衡量家庭粮食安全状况,作为响应变量。从政府网站和涵盖 2012-2016 年的数据集中收集了量化环境因素的指标,包括城市或农村县的分类;获得 SNAP 授权的商店、食品储藏室和娱乐设施的数量;平均公平市场住房租赁价格;以及自然宜人等级,并将其作为混合多元线性回归模型的协变量。
美国印第安纳州 37 个县,2012-2016 年。
具有儿童的家庭中符合 SNAP-Ed 条件的成年人(n 328)。
在这项探索性研究中,调查的环境因素均与家庭粮食安全状况的变化无关。
无论农村还是城市地区,无论环境因素如何,SNAP-Ed 都能改善粮食安全状况。在农村地区扩大 SNAP-Ed 的覆盖范围可能有助于支持低收入人群的粮食获取,并降低农村地区与城市地区相比粮食不安全的发生率。需要进一步调查社会生态模型的政策、制度和环境因素,以更好地了解它们与直接 SNAP-Ed 的关系及其对饮食相关行为和粮食安全的影响。