Nine human epidemiological studies on synthetic amorphous silica and respiratory health.

The respiratory health effects of Synthetic Amorphous Silica (SAS) have been studied in human epidemiological research. This article presents a historical overview and review of nine occupational worker studies that have been conducted so far on this topic. The combined study population of all of these studies included 1172 employees, and exposure concentrations ranged from < 1 mg/m to 100 mg/m. In two studies with a total of 293 workers, the incidence of silicosis was investigated after long-term exposure to precipitated SAS, and no cases of silicosis were found (Plunkett and Dewitt, 1962; Volk, 1960). In another study, the spirometry results of 40 workers were normal (Vitums et al., 1977). In a study of 28 workers, 4 cases of silicosis were identified, but it is possible that contamination with cristobalite occurred and detailed information about the amorphous silica origin was not provided (Mohrmann and Kahn, 1985). Ferch et al. (1987) found that lung impairment was associated with confounding factors (smoking) but not with exposure to precipitated SAS in a study of 143 workers. Choudat et al. (1990) reported a reduction in forced expiratory flow in a group exposed to precipitated SAS compared to a control group. Still, they found no correlation between the extent of exposure and pulmonary function was found in a study of 131 workers. Wilson et al. (1979) also failed to show a significant association between the degree of exposure to precipitated SAS and annual changes in lung function in a study of 165 workers. In the most recent and most extensive study (Taeger et al., 2016; Yong et al., 2022) in Germany, involving 462 factory workers, no association between inhalable or respirable SAS dust exposure and respiratory health was reported. Based on the available data, there is no evidence-base to support a relationship between SAS and respiratory health in humans.