• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制药产品组合管理的趋势、挑战及成功因素:决策中的认知偏差及其缓解措施

Trends, challenges, and success factors in pharmaceutical portfolio management: Cognitive biases in decision-making and their mitigating measures.

作者信息

Bieske Linn, Zinner Maximillian, Dahlhausen Florian, Trübel Hubert

机构信息

Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Germany.

Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Germany; The Knowledge House GmbH, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Drug Discov Today. 2023 Oct;28(10):103734. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103734. Epub 2023 Aug 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103734
PMID:37572999
Abstract

Effective portfolio management is crucial for innovation and sustaining revenue in pharmaceutical companies. This article holistically reviews trends, challenges, and approaches to pharmaceutical portfolio management and focuses, in particular, on cognitive biases in portfolio decision-making. Portfolio managers strongly rely on external innovation and face increasing competitive pressure and portfolio complexity. The ability to address biases and make robust decisions remains a challenge. Portfolio management practitioners most commonly face confirmation bias, champion bias, or misaligned incentives, which they seek to mitigate through expert input, team diversity, and rewarding truth-seeking. Ultimately, highest-quality portfolio management decision-making could be enabled by three factors: high-quality data, structured review processes, and comprehensive mitigating measures against biases in decision-making.

摘要

有效的投资组合管理对于制药公司的创新和维持收入至关重要。本文全面回顾了制药投资组合管理的趋势、挑战和方法,尤其关注投资组合决策中的认知偏差。投资组合经理严重依赖外部创新,面临着日益增加的竞争压力和投资组合复杂性。应对偏差并做出稳健决策的能力仍然是一项挑战。投资组合管理从业者最常面临确认偏差、拥护者偏差或激励措施不一致的问题,他们试图通过专家意见、团队多样性和奖励追求真相来缓解这些问题。最终,高质量的投资组合管理决策可以由三个因素促成:高质量数据、结构化审查流程以及针对决策偏差的全面缓解措施。

相似文献

1
Trends, challenges, and success factors in pharmaceutical portfolio management: Cognitive biases in decision-making and their mitigating measures.制药产品组合管理的趋势、挑战及成功因素:决策中的认知偏差及其缓解措施
Drug Discov Today. 2023 Oct;28(10):103734. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103734. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
2
Decision-making in product portfolios of pharmaceutical research and development--managing streams of innovation in highly regulated markets.制药研发产品组合中的决策制定——在高度监管的市场中管理创新流
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2014 Oct 21;8:2009-16. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S68579. eCollection 2014.
3
Going beyond probability of success: Opportunities for statisticians to influence quantitative decision-making at the portfolio level.超越成功概率:统计学家在投资组合层面影响定量决策的机会。
Pharm Stat. 2024 May-Jun;23(3):429-438. doi: 10.1002/pst.2361. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
4
How debunking biases in research and development decisions could lead to more equitable healthcare?消除研发决策中的偏见如何能带来更公平的医疗保健?
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Jul;17(7):e13880. doi: 10.1111/cts.13880.
5
Interventions to Mitigate Cognitive Biases in the Decision Making of Eye Care Professionals: A Systematic Review.减轻眼科护理专业人员决策中认知偏差的干预措施:一项系统评价。
Optom Vis Sci. 2019 Nov;96(11):818-824. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001445.
6
Decision making biases in the allied health professions: A systematic scoping review.辅助卫生专业人员的决策偏差:系统范围综述。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 20;15(10):e0240716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240716. eCollection 2020.
7
Mitigating bias in pharmaceutical R&D decision-making.减轻制药研发决策中的偏差。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2022 Dec;21(12):874-875. doi: 10.1038/d41573-022-00157-4.
8
Improving clinical decision-making in psychiatry: implementation of digital phenotyping could mitigate the influence of patient's and practitioner's individual cognitive biases.改善精神病学的临床决策:实施数字表型可以减轻患者和医生个体认知偏见的影响。
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2022 Jun 1;23(1):52-61. doi: 10.1080/19585969.2022.2042165. eCollection 2021.
9
Evaluating the Presence of Cognitive Biases in Health Care Decision Making: A Survey of U.S. Formulary Decision Makers.评估医疗保健决策中的认知偏差:对美国处方决策制定者的调查。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Nov;24(11):1173-1183. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.11.1173.
10
Replenishing the pipeline: A quantitative approach to optimising the sourcing of new projects.补充人才库:一种优化新项目来源的定量方法。
Pharm Stat. 2023 Sep-Oct;22(5):861-879. doi: 10.1002/pst.2316. Epub 2023 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
How debunking biases in research and development decisions could lead to more equitable healthcare?消除研发决策中的偏见如何能带来更公平的医疗保健?
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Jul;17(7):e13880. doi: 10.1111/cts.13880.