Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Orygen, 35 Poplar Rd, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 12;13(1):13112. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40245-y.
The classification of non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP) according to multidimensional data could guide clinical management; yet recent systematic reviews show this has not been attempted. This was a prospective cross-sectional study of participants with CLBP (n = 21) and age-, sex- and height-matched pain-free controls (n = 21). Nervous system, lumbar spinal tissue and psychosocial factors were collected. Dimensionality reduction was followed by fuzzy c-means clustering to determine sub-groups. Machine learning models (Support Vector Machine, k-Nearest Neighbour, Naïve Bayes and Random Forest) were used to determine the accuracy of classification to sub-groups. The primary analysis showed that four factors (cognitive function, depressive symptoms, general self-efficacy and anxiety symptoms) and two clusters (normal versus impaired psychosocial profiles) optimally classified participants. The error rates in classification models ranged from 4.2 to 14.2% when only CLBP patients were considered and increased to 24.2 to 37.5% when pain-free controls were added. This data-driven pilot study classified participants with CLBP into sub-groups, primarily based on psychosocial factors. This contributes to the literature as it was the first study to evaluate data-driven machine learning CLBP classification based on nervous system, lumbar spinal tissue and psychosocial factors. Future studies with larger sample sizes should validate these findings.
根据多维数据对非特异性慢性下腰痛(CLBP)进行分类可以指导临床管理;然而,最近的系统评价表明,尚未尝试过这种分类。这是一项前瞻性的横断面研究,纳入了 21 名 CLBP 患者(n=21)和 21 名年龄、性别和身高匹配的无痛对照组参与者。收集了神经系统、腰椎组织和心理社会因素。进行降维后,采用模糊 c 均值聚类确定亚组。使用机器学习模型(支持向量机、k-最近邻、朴素贝叶斯和随机森林)来确定对亚组的分类准确性。主要分析表明,四个因素(认知功能、抑郁症状、一般自我效能和焦虑症状)和两个聚类(正常与受损的心理社会特征)可以最佳地对参与者进行分类。当仅考虑 CLBP 患者时,分类模型的错误率在 4.2%至 14.2%之间,当加入无痛对照组时,错误率增加到 24.2%至 37.5%。这项基于数据的试点研究根据心理社会因素将 CLBP 患者分为亚组。这为文献做出了贡献,因为这是第一项评估基于神经系统、腰椎组织和心理社会因素的基于数据的机器学习 CLBP 分类的研究。未来应进行更大样本量的研究来验证这些发现。