Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6525 EN, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Behavioral Science Institute (BSI), Radboud University Nijmegen, 6525 HR, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nat Commun. 2023 Aug 12;14(1):4880. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40666-3.
Anxious individuals consistently fail in controlling emotional behavior, leading to excessive avoidance, a trait that prevents learning through exposure. Although the origin of this failure is unclear, one candidate system involves control of emotional actions, coordinated through lateral frontopolar cortex (FPl) via amygdala and sensorimotor connections. Using structural, functional, and neurochemical evidence, we show how FPl-based emotional action control fails in highly-anxious individuals. Their FPl is overexcitable, as indexed by GABA/glutamate ratio at rest, and receives stronger amygdalofugal projections than non-anxious male participants. Yet, high-anxious individuals fail to recruit FPl during emotional action control, relying instead on dorsolateral and medial prefrontal areas. This functional anatomical shift is proportional to FPl excitability and amygdalofugal projections strength. The findings characterize circuit-level vulnerabilities in anxious individuals, showing that even mild emotional challenges can saturate FPl neural range, leading to a neural bottleneck in the control of emotional action tendencies.
焦虑个体在控制情绪行为方面持续失败,导致过度回避,这一特征阻止了通过暴露进行学习。尽管这种失败的起源尚不清楚,但一个候选系统涉及情绪行为的控制,通过杏仁核和感觉运动连接通过侧额极皮层(FPl)进行协调。我们利用结构、功能和神经化学证据,展示了基于 FPl 的情绪行为控制如何在高度焦虑个体中失败。他们的 FPl 过度兴奋,以休息时 GABA/谷氨酸比率为指标,并且接收比非焦虑男性参与者更强的杏仁核传出投射。然而,高焦虑个体在情绪行为控制期间未能招募 FPl,而是依赖于背外侧和内侧前额叶区域。这种功能解剖学转变与 FPl 的兴奋性和杏仁核传出投射的强度成正比。这些发现描述了焦虑个体在回路水平上的脆弱性,表明即使是轻微的情绪挑战也会使 FPl 的神经范围饱和,导致情绪动作倾向控制中的神经瓶颈。