Hunt Christopher, Caudle Morgan M, Paulus Martin P, Stein Murray B, Taylor Charles T, Bomyea Jessica
VA San Diego Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, USA.
J Mood Anxiety Disord. 2025 Feb 7;10:100110. doi: 10.1016/j.xjmad.2025.100110. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Accumulating evidence suggests that social anxiety disorder (SAD) is characterized by diminished approach of positive social stimuli. Approach-positive approach-avoidance training (AP-AAT) may reduce this bias, but its results have been mixed. AP-AAT might be more effective for patients with deficits in the neural approach processes AP-AAT targets. Here, we attempted to identify neural areas underlying reduced approach of positive social stimuli in SAD and explore whether activity in such areas predicted response to AP-AAT.
This was a secondary analysis of an AP-AAT clinical trial involving 40 SAD participants and 22 healthy controls (HCs). A social approach-avoidance task was completed during fMRI to identify neural activation differences between SAD and HC subjects when approaching positive social cues. SAD participants were then randomized to AP-AAT ( = 18) or sham training ( = 22). Treatment response was assessed by changes in positive affect and social connection from pre-to-post treatment.
Compared to HCs, SAD patients exhibited significantly less activation in the left paracentral lobule (PCL), right superior parietal lobule (SPL), and left lingual gyrus (LG) when approaching relative to avoiding positive social cues. Lower activation in the right SPL (b=-7.15, p = .022) and left LG (b=-6.93, p = .007) during social approach versus avoidance predicted greater improvement in positive affect (but not social connection) in the AP-AAT group relative to sham.
Lower neural activation during positive social approach at baseline predicted better AP-AAT response. AP-AAT may be particularly well-suited to SAD patients exhibiting the neural approach deficits that the treatment putatively targets.
NCT02136212.
越来越多的证据表明,社交焦虑障碍(SAD)的特征是对积极社交刺激的趋近减少。趋近-积极趋近-回避训练(AP-AAT)可能会减少这种偏差,但其结果不一。AP-AAT可能对AP-AAT所针对的神经趋近过程存在缺陷的患者更有效。在此,我们试图确定社交焦虑障碍中积极社交刺激趋近减少背后的神经区域,并探讨这些区域的活动是否能预测对AP-AAT的反应。
这是一项对AP-AAT临床试验的二次分析,该试验涉及40名社交焦虑障碍参与者和22名健康对照者(HCs)。在功能磁共振成像(fMRI)期间完成一项社交趋近-回避任务,以确定社交焦虑障碍患者和健康对照者在趋近积极社交线索时的神经激活差异。然后将社交焦虑障碍参与者随机分为AP-AAT组(n = 18)或假训练组(n = 22)。通过治疗前后积极情绪和社交联系的变化来评估治疗反应。
与健康对照者相比,社交焦虑障碍患者在趋近相对于回避积极社交线索时,左侧中央旁小叶(PCL)、右侧顶上小叶(SPL)和左侧舌回(LG)的激活明显较少。在社交趋近与回避过程中,右侧SPL(b = -7.15,p = 0.022)和左侧LG(b = -6.93,p = 0.007)的激活较低,预测了AP-AAT组相对于假训练组在积极情绪(而非社交联系)方面有更大改善。
基线时积极社交趋近过程中较低的神经激活预测了对AP-AAT的更好反应。AP-AAT可能特别适合表现出该治疗假定针对的神经趋近缺陷的社交焦虑障碍患者。
NCT02136212。