Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
School of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2024 May;117(5):1025-1033. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.07.040. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
The quality of life between the totally stapled Collard (TSC) and circular stapled (CS) techniques from the patient's perspective has not been assessed. This longitudinal patient-reported outcome and objective data assessment study aimed to compare the effects of TSC vs CS for cervical anastomosis with minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) on the quality of life.
This single-center, retrospective study included patients with esophageal cancer who underwent MIE and cervical anastomosis between April 2019 and February 2021; of whom, 105 and 216 patients received TSC and CS anastomosis, respectively. The objective metrics were evaluated based on postoperative complications. Patient-reported outcomes instruments using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer modules were assessed preoperatively. The Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) Core 30 and the QLQ-Oesophagus Module 18 assessed the quality of life. Mixed-effects models examined changes in questionnaire scores.
The stenosis rate in the TSC group was significantly lower than that in the CS group. There were no significant differences in other postoperative complications between the groups. In the QLQ Core 30 scale, the TSC group had better emotional function, less fatigue, less appetite loss, and better function than the CS group, with significant differences in different time points between the groups. QLQ-Oesophagus Module 18 revealed that the TSC group had significantly less appetite loss, dysphagia, dry mouth, pain, and obstruction, and better eating and speech than the CS group.
TSC has significant advantages over the CS technique in lowering postoperative symptom burden and improving quality of life for cervical anastomosis on patient-reported outcomes.
从患者角度来看,完全吻合 Collard(TSC)与圆形吻合(CS)技术之间的生活质量尚未得到评估。这项前瞻性患者报告结局和客观数据评估研究旨在比较 TSC 与 CS 用于微创食管切除术(MIE)后颈吻合术对生活质量的影响。
这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了 2019 年 4 月至 2021 年 2 月期间接受 MIE 和颈吻合术的食管癌患者;其中 105 例和 216 例患者分别接受了 TSC 和 CS 吻合术。根据术后并发症评估客观指标。使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织模块评估术前患者报告结局工具。使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷(QLQ)核心 30 分表和 QLQ-Oesophagus 模块 18 评估生活质量。混合效应模型检查问卷评分的变化。
TSC 组的狭窄率明显低于 CS 组。两组间其他术后并发症无显著差异。在 QLQ 核心 30 量表中,TSC 组在不同时间点的情绪功能、疲劳感、食欲丧失、摄食功能均优于 CS 组,差异有统计学意义。QLQ-Oesophagus 模块 18 显示 TSC 组在食欲丧失、吞咽困难、口干、疼痛、梗阻和进食、言语方面均明显优于 CS 组。
在颈吻合术方面,与 CS 技术相比,TSC 显著降低术后症状负担,提高患者报告结局的生活质量。