Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Breast Cancer Now Toby Robinsons Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Clin Cancer Res. 2023 Sep 15;29(18):3691-3705. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-0370.
The TNT trial (NCT00532727) showed no evidence of carboplatin superiority over docetaxel in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), but carboplatin benefit was observed in the germline BRCA1/2 mutation subgroup. Broader response-predictive biomarkers are needed. We explored the predictive ability of DNA damage response (DDR) and immune markers.
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were evaluated for 222 of 376 patients. Primary tumors (PT) from 186 TNT participants (13 matched recurrences) were profiled using total RNA sequencing. Four transcriptional DDR-related and 25 immune-related signatures were evaluated. We assessed their association with objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Conditional inference forest clustering was applied to integrate multimodal data. The biology of subgroups was characterized by 693 gene expression modules and other markers.
Transcriptional DDR-related biomarkers were not predictive of ORR to either treatment overall. Changes from PT to recurrence were demonstrated; in chemotherapy-naïve patients, transcriptional DDR markers separated carboplatin responders from nonresponders (P values = 0.017; 0.046). High immune infiltration was associated with docetaxel ORR (interaction P values < 0.05). Six subgroups were identified; the immune-enriched cluster had preferential docetaxel response [62.5% (D) vs. 29.4% (C); P = 0.016]. The immune-depleted cluster had preferential carboplatin response [8.0% (D) vs. 40.0% (C); P = 0.011]. DDR-related subgroups were too small to assess ORR.
High immune features predict docetaxel response, and high DDR signature scores predict carboplatin response in treatment-naïve mTNBC. Integrating multimodal DDR and immune-related markers identifies subgroups with differential treatment sensitivity. Treatment options for patients with immune-low and DDR-proficient tumors remains an outstanding need. Caution is needed using PT-derived transcriptional signatures to direct treatment in mTNBC, particularly DDR-related markers following prior chemotherapy.
TNT 试验(NCT00532727)并未显示卡铂在转移性三阴性乳腺癌(mTNBC)中优于多西他赛的证据,但在种系 BRCA1/2 突变亚组中观察到卡铂获益。需要更广泛的反应预测生物标志物。我们探索了 DNA 损伤反应(DDR)和免疫标志物的预测能力。
对 376 名患者中的 222 名进行了肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞评估。对 186 名 TNT 参与者的 186 个原发肿瘤(PT)(13 个匹配的复发)进行了总 RNA 测序分析。评估了 4 个转录 DDR 相关和 25 个免疫相关特征。我们评估了它们与客观缓解率(ORR)和无进展生存期(PFS)的相关性。条件推断森林聚类用于整合多模态数据。通过 693 个基因表达模块和其他标记物来描述亚组的生物学特性。
转录 DDR 相关生物标志物与两种治疗方法的 ORR 均无相关性。从 PT 到复发的变化表明,在化疗初治患者中,转录 DDR 标志物可将卡铂应答者与无应答者区分开来(P 值分别为 0.017 和 0.046)。高免疫浸润与多西他赛的 ORR 相关(交互 P 值<0.05)。确定了 6 个亚组;富含免疫的亚组对多西他赛的反应更为敏感[62.5%(D)比 29.4%(C);P=0.016]。免疫耗竭亚组对卡铂的反应更为敏感[8.0%(D)比 40.0%(C);P=0.011]。DDR 相关亚组太小,无法评估 ORR。
高免疫特征预测多西他赛的反应,高 DDR 特征评分预测化疗初治 mTNBC 中卡铂的反应。整合多模态 DDR 和免疫相关标志物可确定具有不同治疗敏感性的亚组。对于免疫低和 DDR 功能良好的肿瘤患者,仍需要治疗选择。在 mTNBC 中,特别是在先前化疗后,使用 PT 衍生的转录特征指导治疗时应谨慎,尤其是 DDR 相关标志物。