• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲甲状腺影像报告和数据系统在分层甲状腺结节恶性风险中的表现:一项前瞻性研究。

Performance of European Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in Stratifying Malignancy Risk of Thyroid Nodules: A Prospective Study.

作者信息

Nabahati Mehrdad, Moazezi Zoleika

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.

Department of Endocrinology, Rohani Hospital, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.

出版信息

J Med Ultrasound. 2022 Sep 22;31(2):127-132. doi: 10.4103/jmu.jmu_19_22. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.

DOI:10.4103/jmu.jmu_19_22
PMID:37576418
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10413406/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a limited number of studies reporting the performance of European Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (EU-TIRADS) guideline in identifying thyroid nodule malignancy. We aimed to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of EU-TIRADS regardless of thyroid nodule size.

METHODS

During August 2019-November 2021, subjects with thyroid nodules were prospectively included. Sonographic characteristics were recorded and scored as per EU-TIRADS guideline. Finally, fine-needle aspiration (FNA) was performed, and cytological findings were reported.

RESULTS

Totally, 1266 thyroid nodules from 984 subjects were assessed, of which 295 nodules were smaller than 10 mm and 971 nodules were 10 mm or larger. Among nodules <10 mm, prevalence rates of malignancy for EU-TIRADS classes 2-5 were 0.0%, 3.7%, 20.6%, and 40.9%, respectively; these rates among nodules ≥10 mm were 2.3%, 4.0%, 19.3%, and 43.2%, respectively. The accuracy values of EU-TIRADS class 5 and EU-TIRADS class 4 or 5 in diagnosis of malignancy for nodules <10 mm were 86.4% and 79.7%, respectively; these rates for nodules ≥10 mm were 83.8% and 76.3%, respectively. Hypoechogenicity, microcalcification, ill-defined and irregular margins were predictors for malignancy regardless of thyroid nodule size.

CONCLUSION

EU-TIRADS could provide an acceptable malignancy risk stratification that is helpful for better distinguishing benignity from malignancy, as well as preventing unnecessary FNA biopsies, in thyroid nodules irrespective of their size.

摘要

背景

报告欧洲甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(EU-TIRADS)指南在识别甲状腺结节恶性方面表现的研究数量有限。我们旨在评估EU-TIRADS在不考虑甲状腺结节大小情况下的诊断准确性。

方法

在2019年8月至2021年11月期间,前瞻性纳入患有甲状腺结节的受试者。记录超声特征并根据EU-TIRADS指南进行评分。最后,进行细针穿刺(FNA)并报告细胞学结果。

结果

总共评估了984名受试者的1266个甲状腺结节,其中295个结节小于10毫米,971个结节为10毫米或更大。在小于10毫米的结节中,EU-TIRADS 2-5类的恶性患病率分别为0.0%、3.7%、20.6%和40.9%;在大于等于10毫米的结节中,这些患病率分别为2.3%、4.0%、19.3%和43.2%。对于小于10毫米的结节,EU-TIRADS 5类和EU-TIRADS 4或5类在诊断恶性方面的准确性值分别为86.4%和79.7%;对于大于等于10毫米的结节,这些值分别为83.8%和76.3%。无论甲状腺结节大小如何,低回声、微钙化、边界不清和不规则边缘都是恶性的预测因素。

结论

EU-TIRADS可以提供可接受的恶性风险分层,有助于更好地区分甲状腺结节的良性与恶性,以及避免不必要的FNA活检,无论结节大小如何。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151f/10413406/242a4e695819/JMU-31-127-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151f/10413406/da4ff0254e26/JMU-31-127-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151f/10413406/4094e5e4d960/JMU-31-127-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151f/10413406/bb3df38620d6/JMU-31-127-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151f/10413406/5986f9d989df/JMU-31-127-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151f/10413406/ed7615d40bcb/JMU-31-127-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151f/10413406/242a4e695819/JMU-31-127-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151f/10413406/da4ff0254e26/JMU-31-127-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151f/10413406/4094e5e4d960/JMU-31-127-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151f/10413406/bb3df38620d6/JMU-31-127-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151f/10413406/5986f9d989df/JMU-31-127-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151f/10413406/ed7615d40bcb/JMU-31-127-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151f/10413406/242a4e695819/JMU-31-127-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Performance of European Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in Stratifying Malignancy Risk of Thyroid Nodules: A Prospective Study.欧洲甲状腺影像报告和数据系统在分层甲状腺结节恶性风险中的表现:一项前瞻性研究。
J Med Ultrasound. 2022 Sep 22;31(2):127-132. doi: 10.4103/jmu.jmu_19_22. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
2
Analysis of 665 thyroid nodules using both EU-TIRADS and ACR TI-RADS classification systems.使用欧盟甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(EU-TIRADS)及美国放射学会甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(ACR TI-RADS)分类系统对665个甲状腺结节进行分析。
Thyroid Res. 2023 May 8;16(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13044-023-00155-7.
3
Impact of the Hypoechogenicity Criteria on Thyroid Nodule Malignancy Risk Stratification Performance by Different TIRADS Systems.不同甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TIRADS)中低回声标准对甲状腺结节恶性风险分层性能的影响
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Nov 8;13(21):5581. doi: 10.3390/cancers13215581.
4
Diagnostic performance of ACR-TIRADS, Korean TIRADS, and American Thyroid Association guidelines for risk stratification of thyroid nodules: a prospective study.ACR-TIRADS、韩国 TIRADS 和美国甲状腺协会甲状腺结节风险分层指南的诊断性能:一项前瞻性研究。
J Ultrasound. 2022 Dec;25(4):887-894. doi: 10.1007/s40477-022-00669-0. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
5
Accuracy of the European Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (EU-TIRADS) in the valuation of thyroid nodule malignancy in reference to the post-surgery histological results.欧洲甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(EU-TIRADS)参照术后组织学结果评估甲状腺结节恶性肿瘤的准确性。
Pol J Radiol. 2018 Dec 19;83:e579-e586. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2018.81556. eCollection 2018.
6
Comparison of Thyroid Risk Categorization Systems and Fine-Needle Aspiration Recommendations in a Multi-Institutional Thyroid Ultrasound Registry.多机构甲状腺超声数据库中甲状腺风险分类系统与细针抽吸建议的比较。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Dec;18(12):1605-1613. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.07.019. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
7
A prospective comparison of ACR-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS in thyroid nodule assessment for FNA-US.ACR-TIRADS和EU-TIRADS在甲状腺结节FNA-US评估中的前瞻性比较。
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2023 Mar;98(3):415-425. doi: 10.1111/cen.14799. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
8
Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of EU-TIRADS in Discriminating Benign from Malignant Thyroid Nodules: A Prospective Study in One Referral Center.评估欧盟甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(EU-TIRADS)在鉴别甲状腺良恶性结节方面的诊断性能:一项在某转诊中心的前瞻性研究。
Eur Thyroid J. 2021 Feb;9(6):304-312. doi: 10.1159/000507575. Epub 2020 May 18.
9
Cytology-Ultrasonography Risk-Stratification Scoring System Based on Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology and the Korean-Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System.基于细针抽吸细胞学和韩国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统的细胞学-超声风险分层评分系统。
Thyroid. 2017 Jul;27(7):953-959. doi: 10.1089/thy.2016.0603. Epub 2017 May 19.
10
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of ACR-TIRADS, American Thyroid Association (ATA), and EU-TIRADS guidelines in detecting thyroid malignancy.ACR-TIRADS、美国甲状腺协会(ATA)和 EU-TIRADS 指南在诊断甲状腺恶性肿瘤中的准确性比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2020 Dec;133:109390. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109390. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences among the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System proposed by Korean, the American College of Radiology and the European Thyroid Association in the diagnostic performance of thyroid nodules.韩国、美国放射学会和欧洲甲状腺协会提出的甲状腺影像报告和数据系统在甲状腺结节诊断性能方面的差异。
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Aug;9(8):4958-4967. doi: 10.21037/tcr-19-2870.
2
Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of EU-TIRADS in Discriminating Benign from Malignant Thyroid Nodules: A Prospective Study in One Referral Center.评估欧盟甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(EU-TIRADS)在鉴别甲状腺良恶性结节方面的诊断性能:一项在某转诊中心的前瞻性研究。
Eur Thyroid J. 2021 Feb;9(6):304-312. doi: 10.1159/000507575. Epub 2020 May 18.
3
Temporal and Geographical Trends of Incidence of Thyroid Cancer in Golestan, Iran, 2004-2013.
2004-2013 年伊朗戈勒斯坦甲状腺癌发病率的时间和地理趋势。
Arch Iran Med. 2021 Jan 1;24(1):1-6. doi: 10.34172/aim.2021.01.
4
Trends in thyroid function testing, neck ultrasound, thyroid fine needle aspiration, and thyroidectomies in North-eastern Italy.意大利东北部甲状腺功能检测、颈部超声、甲状腺细针穿刺和甲状腺切除术的趋势。
J Endocrinol Invest. 2021 Aug;44(8):1679-1688. doi: 10.1007/s40618-020-01475-3. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
5
Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Five Different Ultrasound TI-RADS Classification Guidelines for Thyroid Nodules.五种不同甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TI-RADS)分类指南对甲状腺结节诊断性能的比较
Front Oncol. 2020 Nov 16;10:598225. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.598225. eCollection 2020.
6
Performance of EU-TIRADS in malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis.EU-TIRADS 在甲状腺结节恶性风险分层中的表现:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Endocrinol. 2020 Sep;183(3):255-264. doi: 10.1530/EJE-20-0204.
7
Accuracy of thyroid imaging reporting and data system category 4 or 5 for diagnosing malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.甲状腺影像报告和数据系统分类 4 或 5 用于诊断恶性肿瘤的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Oct;30(10):5611-5624. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06875-w. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
8
FNA indication according to ACR-TIRADS, EU-TIRADS and K-TIRADS in thyroid incidentalomas at F-FDG PET/CT.F-FDG PET/CT 检查甲状腺偶发瘤时,根据 ACR-TIRADS、EU-TIRADS 和 K-TIRADS 的适应证进行细针抽吸活检。
J Endocrinol Invest. 2020 Nov;43(11):1607-1612. doi: 10.1007/s40618-020-01244-2. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
9
Diagnostic Performance of Different Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (Kwak-TIRADS, EU-TIRADS and ACR TI-RADS) for Risk Stratification of Small Thyroid Nodules (≤10 mm).不同甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(Kwak-TIRADS、EU-TIRADS和ACR TI-RADS)对小甲状腺结节(≤10 mm)风险分层的诊断性能。
J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 16;9(1):236. doi: 10.3390/jcm9010236.
10
A multicentre validation study for the EU-TIRADS using histological diagnosis as a gold standard.一项以组织学诊断为金标准的针对 EU-TIRADS 的多中心验证研究。
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2019 Aug;91(2):340-347. doi: 10.1111/cen.13997. Epub 2019 May 3.