Freitas-Lemos Roberta, Tomlinson Devin C, Yeh Yu-Hua, Dwyer Candice L, Dai Hongying Daisy, Leventhal Adam, Tegge Allison N, Bickel Warren K
Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke, VA, USA.
Graduate Program in Translational Biology, Medicine, and Health, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Jun 11;35:102280. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102280. eCollection 2023 Oct.
Despite being a major threat to health, vaccine hesitancy (i.e., refusal or reluctance to vaccinate despite vaccine availability) is on the rise. Using a longitudinal cohort of young adults (N = 1260) from Los Angeles County, California we investigated the neurobehavioral mechanisms underlying COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Data were collected at two time points: during adolescence (12th grade; fall 2016; average age = 16.96 (±0.42)) and during young adulthood (spring 2021; average age = 21.33 (±0.49)). Main outcomes and measures were delay discounting (DD; fall 2016) and tendency to act rashly when experiencing positive and negative emotions (UPPS-P; fall 2016); self-reported vaccine hesitancy and vaccine beliefs/knowledge (spring 2021). A principal components analysis determined four COVID-19 vaccine beliefs/knowledge themes: and . Significant relationships were found between themes, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, and DD. (β = -1.158[-1.213,-1.102]) and (β = -0.132[-0.185,-0.078]) scores were negatively associated, while (β = 0.283[0.230,0.337]) and (β = 0.412[0.358,0.466]) scores were positively associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Additionally, (β = -0.060[-0.101,-0.018]) was negatively associated, and (β = -0.063[0.021,0.105]) was positively associated with DD from fall 2016. Mediation analysis revealed immediacy bias during adolescence, measured by DD, predicted vaccine hesitancy 4 years later while being mediated by two types of vaccine beliefs/knowledge: (β = 0.069[0.022,0.116]) and (β = 0.026[0.008,0.044]). These findings provide a further understanding of individual vaccine-related decision-making among young adults and inform public health messaging to increase vaccination acceptance.
尽管疫苗犹豫(即尽管有疫苗供应,但仍拒绝或不愿接种疫苗)对健康构成重大威胁,但其现象却在不断增加。我们以加利福尼亚州洛杉矶县的一个年轻成年人纵向队列(N = 1260)为研究对象,调查了新冠疫苗犹豫背后的神经行为机制。数据在两个时间点收集:青春期(12年级;2016年秋季;平均年龄 = 16.96(±0.42))和青年期(2021年春季;平均年龄 = 21.33(±0.49))。主要结果和测量指标包括延迟折扣(DD;2016年秋季)以及在经历积极和消极情绪时的冲动行事倾向(UPPS - P;2016年秋季);自我报告的疫苗犹豫以及疫苗信念/知识(2021年春季)。主成分分析确定了四个新冠疫苗信念/知识主题:以及。在这些主题、新冠疫苗犹豫和延迟折扣之间发现了显著关系。(β = -1.158[-1.213, -1.102])和(β = -0.132[-0.185, -0.078])得分呈负相关,而(β = 0.283[0.230, 0.337])和(β = 0.412[0.358, 0.466])得分与新冠疫苗犹豫呈正相关。此外,(β = -0.060[-0.101, -0.018])呈负相关,(β = -0.063[0.021, 0.105])与2016年秋季的延迟折扣呈正相关。中介分析显示,青春期以延迟折扣衡量的即时性偏差预测了4年后的疫苗犹豫,同时由两种类型的疫苗信念/知识介导:(β = 0.069[0.022, 0.116])和(β = 0.026[0.008, 0.044])。这些发现进一步加深了我们对年轻人中与疫苗相关的个体决策的理解,并为提高疫苗接种接受度的公共卫生信息提供了参考。