Rovsing Alma Holm, Savran Osman, Ulrik Charlotte Suppli
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Front Allergy. 2023 Jul 28;4:1211949. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2023.1211949. eCollection 2023.
Add-on magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) for refractory asthma exacerbation has been much debated. The aim of this review and meta-analysis is, therefore, to provide an update on the current evidence for the efficacy of MgSO4 in exacerbations of asthma in adults refractory to standard of care treatment.
A systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The search was performed in the PubMed database (updated April 2023). For the meta-analysis, a random-effects model was applied using the metaphor package for RStudio (RStudio, Inc.).
A total of 17 randomized controlled trials were included. Three of the nine studies addressing treatment with intravenous (IV) MgSO4 found a significant effect on lung function compared to placebo. Of the eight studies investigating hospital admission rate, only two found a significant effect of MgSO4. Six of the nine studies investigating treatment with nebulized MgSO4 compared to placebo found a favorable effect on forced expiratory volume in 1. second (FEV) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEF). Only two of the five studies investigating the effect on hospital admission rate found an effect of MgSO4. Comparing effect sizes in a meta-analysis revealed a greater effect on PEF in asthma patients treated with nebulized MgSO4 (MD, 23.57; 95% CI, -2.48 to 49.62, < 0.01) compared to placebo. The analysis of patients treated with i.v. MgSO4 compared to placebo showed no statistically significant difference (MD, 5.49; 95% CI, -18.67 to 29.65, = 0.10).
Up to two out of three studies revealed an effect of MgSO4 treatment for asthma exacerbation when assessed by FEV/PEF, but fewer studies were positive for the outcome of hospital admissions.
对于难治性哮喘急性发作加用硫酸镁(MgSO4)一直存在诸多争议。因此,本综述和荟萃分析的目的是更新目前关于MgSO4对标准治疗无效的成人哮喘急性发作疗效的证据。
按照PRISMA指南进行系统综述。检索在PubMed数据库中进行(2023年4月更新)。对于荟萃分析,使用RStudio(RStudio公司)的metaphor软件包应用随机效应模型。
共纳入17项随机对照试验。在9项探讨静脉注射(IV)MgSO4治疗的研究中,有3项发现与安慰剂相比,对肺功能有显著影响。在8项调查住院率的研究中,只有2项发现MgSO4有显著影响。在9项比较雾化MgSO4与安慰剂治疗的研究中,有6项发现对第1秒用力呼气量(FEV)和呼气峰值流速(PEF)有有利影响。在5项调查对住院率影响的研究中,只有2项发现MgSO4有影响。荟萃分析中比较效应大小显示,与安慰剂相比,雾化MgSO4治疗的哮喘患者对PEF的影响更大(MD,23.57;95%CI,-2.48至49.62,P<0.01)。与安慰剂相比,静脉注射MgSO4治疗患者的分析显示无统计学显著差异(MD,5.49;95%CI,-18.67至29.65,P=0.10)。
高达三分之二的研究显示,通过FEV/PEF评估时,MgSO4治疗对哮喘急性发作有效果,但对住院结局呈阳性的研究较少。