Kid Risk, Inc., Orlando, FL, USA.
Med Decis Making. 2023 Oct-Nov;43(7-8):850-862. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231191127. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
Polio antiviral drugs (PAVDs) may provide a critical tool in the eradication endgame by stopping poliovirus infections in immunodeficient individuals who may not clear the virus without therapeutic intervention. Although prolonged/chronic poliovirus excreters are rare, they represent a source of poliovirus reintroduction into the general population. Prior studies that assumed the successful cessation of all oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) use estimated the potential upper bound of the incremental net benefits (INBs) of resource investments in research and development of PAVDs. However, delays in polio eradication, OPV cessation, and the development of PAVDs necessitate an updated economic analysis to reevaluate the costs and benefits of further investments in PAVDs.
Using a global integrated model of polio transmission, immunity, vaccine dynamics, risks, and economics, we explore the risks of reintroduction of polio transmission due to immunodeficiency-related vaccine-derived poliovirus (iVDPV) excreters and reevaluate the upper bound of the INBs of PAVDs.
Under the current conditions, for which the use of OPV will likely continue for the foreseeable future, even with successful eradication of type 1 wild poliovirus by the end of 2023 and continued use of Sabin OPV for outbreak response, we estimate an upper bound INB of 60 million US$2019. With >100 million US$2019 already invested in PAVD development and with the introduction of novel OPVs that are less likely to revert to neurovirulence, our analysis suggests the expected INBs of PAVDs would not offset their costs.
While PAVDs could play an important role in the polio endgame, their expected economic benefits drop with ongoing OPV use and poliovirus transmissions. However, stakeholders may pursue the development of PAVDs as a desired product regardless of their economic benefits.HighlightsWhile polio antiviral drugs could play an important role in the polio endgame, their expected economic benefits continue to drop with delays in polio eradication and the continued use of oral poliovirus vaccines.The incremental net benefits of investments in polio antiviral drug development and screening for immunodeficiency-related circulating polioviruses are small.Limited global resources are better spent on increasing global population immunity to polioviruses to stop and prevent poliovirus transmission.
抗病毒药物(PAVD)可能是消灭脊髓灰质炎的重要工具,它可以阻止免疫功能低下的个体感染脊髓灰质炎病毒,这些个体如果没有治疗干预,可能无法清除病毒。虽然持续性/慢性脊髓灰质炎病毒排出者较为罕见,但他们是脊髓灰质炎病毒重新引入普通人群的源头。先前的研究假设所有口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗(OPV)的使用都已停止,从而估计了在抗病毒药物的研究和开发方面投入资源的潜在增量净收益(INB)的上限。然而,脊髓灰质炎的消灭、OPV 的停止以及抗病毒药物的开发都需要进行更新的经济分析,以重新评估进一步投资于抗病毒药物的成本和收益。
我们使用全球脊髓灰质炎传播、免疫、疫苗动态、风险和经济综合模型,探讨了由于免疫缺陷相关的疫苗衍生脊髓灰质炎病毒(iVDPV)排出者导致脊髓灰质炎传播重新出现的风险,并重新评估了抗病毒药物的 INB 上限。
根据目前的情况,OPV 的使用可能在可预见的未来继续,即使在 2023 年底前成功消灭 1 型野生脊髓灰质炎病毒,并继续使用萨宾 OPV 应对疫情爆发,我们估计 INB 的上限为 6000 万美元。已经投入超过 1 亿美元用于抗病毒药物的开发,并且新型 OPV 不太可能恢复神经毒力,我们的分析表明,抗病毒药物的预期 INB 不会抵消其成本。
虽然抗病毒药物可能在消灭脊髓灰质炎的过程中发挥重要作用,但随着 OPV 的持续使用和脊髓灰质炎病毒的传播,其预期的经济效益仍在下降。然而,利益相关者可能会不顾抗病毒药物的经济效益而继续开发它们。
虽然抗病毒药物在消灭脊髓灰质炎的过程中可能发挥重要作用,但随着消灭脊髓灰质炎的延迟和口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗的持续使用,其预期的经济效益继续下降。投资于抗病毒药物开发和免疫缺陷相关循环脊髓灰质炎病毒筛查的增量净收益很小。全球有限的资源最好用于提高全球人口对脊髓灰质炎病毒的免疫力,以阻止和预防脊髓灰质炎病毒的传播。