• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

广泛干预前后新冠病毒肺炎患者的社交混合与网络特征:一项基于人群的研究

Social Mixing and Network Characteristics of COVID-19 Patients Before and After Widespread Interventions: A Population-based Study.

作者信息

He Yuncong, Martinez Leonardo, Ge Yang, Feng Yan, Chen Yewen, Tan Jianbin, Westbrook Adrianna, Li Changwei, Cheng Wei, Ling Feng, Cheng Huimin, Wu Shushan, Zhong Wenxuan, Handel Andreas, Huang Hui, Sun Jimin, Shen Ye

出版信息

Epidemiol Infect. 2023 Aug 14;151:1-38. doi: 10.1017/S0950268823001292.

DOI:10.1017/S0950268823001292
PMID:37577939
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10540215/
Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 rapidly spreads among humans via social networks, with social mixing and network characteristics potentially facilitating transmission. However, limited data on topological structural features has hindered in-depth studies. Existing research is based on snapshot analyses, preventing temporal investigations of network changes. Comparing network characteristics over time offers additional insights into transmission dynamics. We examined confirmed COVID-19 patients from an eastern Chinese province, analyzing social mixing and network characteristics using transmission network topology before and after widespread interventions. Between the two time periods, the percentage of singleton networks increased from 38.9 [Image: see text] to 62.8 [Image: see text] [Image: see text] ; the average shortest path length decreased from 1.53 to 1.14 [Image: see text] ; the average betweenness reduced from 0.65 to 0.11 [Image: see text] ; the average cluster size dropped from 4.05 to 2.72 [Image: see text] ; and the out-degree had a slight but nonsignificant decline from 0.75 to 0.63 [Image: see text] Results show that nonpharmaceutical interventions effectively disrupted transmission networks, preventing further disease spread. Additionally, we found that the networks’ dynamic structure provided more information than solely examining infection curves after applying descriptive and agent-based modeling approaches. In summary, we investigated social mixing and network characteristics of COVID-19 patients during different pandemic stages, revealing transmission network heterogeneities.

摘要

严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)通过社交网络在人类中迅速传播,社交混合和网络特征可能会促进传播。然而,关于拓扑结构特征的数据有限,阻碍了深入研究。现有研究基于快照分析,无法对网络变化进行时间维度的调查。比较不同时间的网络特征有助于深入了解传播动态。我们研究了中国东部某省的新冠肺炎确诊患者,利用广泛干预前后的传播网络拓扑结构分析社交混合和网络特征。在两个时间段之间,单例网络的百分比从38.9[图:见正文]增加到62.8[图:见正文][图:见正文];平均最短路径长度从1.53降至1.14[图:见正文];平均介数从0.65降至0.11[图:见正文];平均聚类系数从4.05降至2.72[图:见正文];出度从0.75略有下降但不显著至0.63[图:见正文]。结果表明,非药物干预有效地破坏了传播网络,防止了疾病的进一步传播。此外,我们发现,在应用描述性和基于主体的建模方法后,网络的动态结构比单纯检查感染曲线提供了更多信息。总之,我们研究了不同疫情阶段新冠肺炎患者的社交混合和网络特征,揭示了传播网络的异质性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eb7/10540215/1bb5e99292a3/S0950268823001292_fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eb7/10540215/c48159ae6d02/S0950268823001292_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eb7/10540215/8be1fd65cac1/S0950268823001292_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eb7/10540215/e6de525d4ce1/S0950268823001292_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eb7/10540215/ce9a1e83f279/S0950268823001292_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eb7/10540215/8b6694318ecb/S0950268823001292_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eb7/10540215/8d59a07182fd/S0950268823001292_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eb7/10540215/069225739536/S0950268823001292_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eb7/10540215/1bb5e99292a3/S0950268823001292_fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eb7/10540215/c48159ae6d02/S0950268823001292_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eb7/10540215/8be1fd65cac1/S0950268823001292_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eb7/10540215/e6de525d4ce1/S0950268823001292_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eb7/10540215/ce9a1e83f279/S0950268823001292_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eb7/10540215/8b6694318ecb/S0950268823001292_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eb7/10540215/8d59a07182fd/S0950268823001292_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eb7/10540215/069225739536/S0950268823001292_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eb7/10540215/1bb5e99292a3/S0950268823001292_fig8.jpg

相似文献

1
Social Mixing and Network Characteristics of COVID-19 Patients Before and After Widespread Interventions: A Population-based Study.广泛干预前后新冠病毒肺炎患者的社交混合与网络特征:一项基于人群的研究
Epidemiol Infect. 2023 Aug 14;151:1-38. doi: 10.1017/S0950268823001292.
2
Disassortative mixing patterns of drug-using and sex networks on HIV risk behaviour among young drug users in Yunnan, China.中国云南年轻吸毒者中吸毒网络与性网络在艾滋病病毒风险行为上的异质混合模式
Public Health. 2015 Sep;129(9):1237-43. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.07.020. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
3
The Influence of a School Social Network Intervention on Adolescent's Health Behaviors: A Gender-Specific Agent-Based Model.学校社交网络干预对青少年健康行为的影响:基于代理的性别特定模型。
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 4;10:861743. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.861743. eCollection 2022.
4
Sexual mixing patterns among social networks of HIV-positive and HIV-negative Beijing men who have sex with men: a multilevel comparison using roundtable network mapping.北京男男性行为者中HIV阳性和阴性者社交网络中的性混合模式:使用圆桌网络映射的多层次比较
AIDS Care. 2011 Aug;23(8):1014-25. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2010.542127. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
5
Quantifying human mixing patterns in Chinese provinces outside Hubei after the 2020 lockdown was lifted.量化 2020 年封锁解除后中国湖北省以外省份的人际混合模式。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 May 21;22(1):483. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07455-7.
6
Random vs. nonrandom mixing in network epidemic models.
Health Care Manag Sci. 2002 Apr;5(2):147-55. doi: 10.1023/a:1014489218178.
7
Association between tuberculosis in men and social network structure in Kampala, Uganda.乌干达坎帕拉市男性结核病与社交网络结构之间的关联。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 30;21(1):1023. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06475-z.
8
Mixing patterns in networks.网络中的混合模式。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2003 Feb;67(2 Pt 2):026126. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.026126. Epub 2003 Feb 27.
9
Networks and epidemic models.网络与流行病模型。
J R Soc Interface. 2005 Sep 22;2(4):295-307. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2005.0051.
10
The impact factors of social media users' forwarding behavior of COVID-19 vaccine topic: Based on empirical analysis of Chinese Weibo users.社交媒体用户转发新冠疫苗话题的影响因素:基于中国微博用户的实证分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 14;10:871722. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.871722. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Transmission roles of symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID-19 cases: a modelling study.有症状和无症状 COVID-19 病例的传播作用:一项建模研究。
Epidemiol Infect. 2022 Sep 27;150:e171. doi: 10.1017/S0950268822001467.
2
Transmission dynamics and epidemiological characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant infections in Guangdong, China, May to June 2021.2021 年 5 月至 6 月期间中国广东地区 SARS-CoV-2 Delta 变异株感染的传播动态和流行病学特征。
Euro Surveill. 2022 Mar;27(10). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.10.2100815.
3
Transmission, viral kinetics and clinical characteristics of the emergent SARS-CoV-2 Delta VOC in Guangzhou, China.
中国广州新型严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)德尔塔变异株(VOC)的传播、病毒动力学及临床特征
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Oct;40:101129. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101129. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
4
COVID-19 Transmission Dynamics Among Close Contacts of Index Patients With COVID-19: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Zhejiang Province, China.COVID-19 传播动力学:中国浙江省 COVID-19 索引患者密切接触者的一项基于人群的队列研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Oct 1;181(10):1343-1350. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4686.
5
Rapid Review of Social Contact Patterns During the COVID-19 Pandemic.《COVID-19 大流行期间社会接触模式的快速回顾》
Epidemiology. 2021 Nov 1;32(6):781-791. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001412.
6
The impact of social distancing, contact tracing, and case isolation interventions to suppress the COVID-19 epidemic: A modeling study.社交距离、接触者追踪和病例隔离干预措施对抑制 COVID-19 疫情的影响:建模研究。
Epidemics. 2021 Sep;36:100483. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2021.100483. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
7
Networks of SARS-CoV-2 transmission.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)传播网络。
Science. 2021 Jul 9;373(6551):162-163. doi: 10.1126/science.abg0842.
8
Dynamics of COVID-19 under social distancing measures are driven by transmission network structure.社交隔离措施下 COVID-19 的动态变化由传播网络结构所驱动。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Feb 3;17(2):e1008684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008684. eCollection 2021 Feb.
9
Estimating and explaining the spread of COVID-19 at the county level in the USA.估算并解释美国县级层面的 COVID-19 传播情况。
Commun Biol. 2021 Jan 5;4(1):60. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01609-6.
10
Household Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.家庭传播的 SARS-CoV-2:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2031756. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.31756.