• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

众议院共和党人因支持唐纳德·特朗普的“停止窃取”努力而得到回报。

House Republicans were rewarded for supporting Donald Trump's 'stop the steal' efforts.

机构信息

Department of Political Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203-5721.

Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0245.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Aug 22;120(34):e2309072120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2309072120. Epub 2023 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2309072120
PMID:37579164
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10450433/
Abstract

In early 2021, members of Congress cast a series of high-profile roll call votes forcing them to choose between condoning or opposing Donald Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. Substantial majorities of House Republicans supported Trump, first by opposing the certification of electoral votes from Arizona and Pennsylvania on January 6th, then by opposing the president's impeachment for inciting the attack on the US Capitol, and then by opposing a bill that would have created a national commission to investigate the events of January 6th. We examine whether the House Republicans who voted to support Trump in 2021 were rewarded or punished in the 2022 congressional midterm elections. We find no evidence that members who supported Trump did better or worse in contested general election races. However, Trump supporters were less likely to lose primary elections, more likely to run unopposed in the general election, more likely to run for higher office, and less likely to retire from politics. Overall, there seem to have been no significant political costs and some significant rewards in 2022 for House Republicans who supported Trump's undemocratic behavior.

摘要

2021 年初,国会议员进行了一系列备受瞩目的点名表决,迫使他们在纵容或反对唐纳德·特朗普推翻 2020 年总统选举的努力之间做出选择。大量众议院共和党人支持特朗普,先是在 1 月 6 日反对亚利桑那州和宾夕法尼亚州选举人票的认证,然后反对以煽动袭击美国国会大厦为由对总统进行弹劾,然后反对一项旨在成立一个全国委员会调查 1 月 6 日事件的法案。我们研究了在 2021 年投票支持特朗普的众议院共和党人在 2022 年国会中期选举中是否得到了奖励或惩罚。我们没有发现证据表明支持特朗普的议员在有竞争的大选中表现更好或更差。然而,特朗普的支持者在初选中落败的可能性较小,在大选中更有可能无人竞选,更有可能竞选更高的职位,从政的可能性较小。总的来说,对于在 2022 年支持特朗普的不民主行为的众议院共和党人来说,似乎没有付出重大的政治代价,反而获得了一些重大的回报。

相似文献

1
House Republicans were rewarded for supporting Donald Trump's 'stop the steal' efforts.众议院共和党人因支持唐纳德·特朗普的“停止窃取”努力而得到回报。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Aug 22;120(34):e2309072120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2309072120. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
2
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.
3
A warrant for violence? An analysis of Donald Trump's speech before the US Capitol attack.暴力授权?对唐纳德·特朗普在美国国会大厦袭击事件前演讲的分析。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2024 Jan;63(1):3-19. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12679. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
4
The transformative and informative nature of elections: Representation, schism, and exit.选举的变革性和信息性:代表性、分裂和退出。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2019 Jan;58(1):88-104. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12279. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
5
Diverging Life Expectancies and Voting Patterns in the 2016 US Presidential Election.2016年美国总统大选中不同的预期寿命与投票模式
Am J Public Health. 2017 Oct;107(10):1560-1562. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303945. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
6
Collision course? Donald Trump, Paul Ryan, and the fate of Medicare.《碰撞的轨迹?唐纳德·特朗普、保罗·瑞安和医疗保险的命运》
J Aging Soc Policy. 2018 May-Jun;30(3-4):244-258. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1462682. Epub 2018 May 30.
7
Hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19: Variation in Regional Political Preferences Predicted New Prescriptions after President Trump's Endorsement.羟氯喹治疗 COVID-19:特朗普总统背书后,地区政治偏好差异预测新处方。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2022 Aug 1;47(4):429-451. doi: 10.1215/03616878-9716698.
8
The state of aging policy and politics in the Trump era.特朗普时代的老龄化政策与政治状况。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2018 May-Jun;30(3-4):193-208. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1481314.
9
Connections between viewing media about President Trump's dietary habits and fast food consumption intentions: Political differences and implications for public health.观看媒体报道特朗普总统饮食习惯与快餐消费意向之间的联系:政治差异及其对公共卫生的影响。
Appetite. 2020 Apr 1;147:104545. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104545. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
10
Symbolic disempowerment and Donald Trump's 2016 presidential election: Mental health responses among Latinx and white populations.象征性的权力丧失与唐纳德·特朗普 2016 年总统大选:拉丁裔和白人群体的心理健康反应。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Nov;289:114417. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114417. Epub 2021 Sep 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethnic antagonism erodes Republicans' commitment to democracy.种族对立削弱了共和党人对民主的承诺。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 15;117(37):22752-22759. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007747117. Epub 2020 Aug 31.