• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

殖民主义、精英网络与交叉性:理解卫生政策过程中生物医学权力和公平的关键概念 评“尼日利亚卫生专业人员之间的权力动态:全球基金政策过程案例研究”。

Coloniality, Elite Networks and Intersectionality: Key Concepts in Understanding Biomedical Power and Equity in Health Policy Processes Comment on "Power Dynamics Among Health Professionals in Nigeria: A Case Study of the Global Fund Policy Process".

机构信息

Health Policy and Systems, Sambodhi Research and communications, Noida, India.

School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7916. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7916. Epub 2023 Apr 15.

DOI:10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7916
PMID:37579392
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10425670/
Abstract

To understand the role of power in health policy processes in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) contexts, it is necessary to engage with global and local power structures and their historical contexts. In this commentary, we outline three dimensions that shape a dominant power in health policy processes-the biomedical power. We propose that understanding the linkages between medical power and colonialism; the close connection of public health, medicine and elite networks; and the intersectionalities that shape the powers of medical professionals can offer the means to examine the biomedical hegemony in health policy processes. Additionally we suggest that a more nuanced understanding of the interaction of local powers with global funding can offer some entry points to achieving more equitable and interdisciplinary health policy processes in LMICs.

摘要

为了理解权力在中低收入国家(LMIC)卫生政策制定过程中的作用,有必要参与到全球和地方权力结构及其历史背景中。在本评论中,我们概述了塑造卫生政策制定过程中主导权力的三个维度——生物医学权力。我们认为,理解医学权力与殖民主义之间的联系;公共卫生、医学和精英网络之间的密切联系;以及塑造医学专业人员权力的交叉性,可以提供一种手段来检验卫生政策制定过程中的生物医学霸权。此外,我们还认为,更细致地理解地方权力与全球资金的相互作用,可以为实现 LMIC 中更公平和跨学科的卫生政策制定过程提供一些切入点。

相似文献

1
Coloniality, Elite Networks and Intersectionality: Key Concepts in Understanding Biomedical Power and Equity in Health Policy Processes Comment on "Power Dynamics Among Health Professionals in Nigeria: A Case Study of the Global Fund Policy Process".殖民主义、精英网络与交叉性:理解卫生政策过程中生物医学权力和公平的关键概念 评“尼日利亚卫生专业人员之间的权力动态:全球基金政策过程案例研究”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7916. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7916. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
2
Medical Dominance in Global Health Institutions as an Obstacle to Equity and Effectiveness Comment on "Power Dynamics Among Health Professionals in Nigeria: A Case Study of the Global Fund Policy Process".全球卫生机构中的医学主导地位对公平与效力的阻碍 评“尼日利亚卫生专业人员之间的权力动态:以全球基金政策过程为例”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7734. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7734. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
3
Power Dynamics Among Health Professionals in Nigeria: A Case Study of the Global Fund Policy Process.尼日利亚卫生专业人员之间的权力动态:全球基金政策过程案例研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 19;11(12):2876-2885. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6097. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
4
Situating Biomedical and Professional Monopoly at the Intersections of Structural, Ideational and Agentic Power Comment on "Power Dynamics Among Health Professionals in Nigeria: A Case Study of the Global Fund Policy Process".定位生物医学和专业垄断在结构、观念和能动力量的交汇处 评“尼日利亚卫生专业人员之间的权力动态:以全球基金政策过程为例”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:8019. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.8019. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
5
The Dynamics of Power Flow From the Global Health Financing Comment on "Power Dynamics Among Health Professionals in Nigeria: A Case Study of the Global Fund Policy Process".全球卫生筹资评论中的权力流动动态:以尼日利亚卫生专业人员的权力动态为例研究全球基金政策进程。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7806. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7806. Epub 2023 May 10.
6
Incorporating Intersectionality as a Framework for Equity-Minded Tobacco Control Research: A Call for Collective Action Toward a Paradigm Shift.将交叉性纳入以公平为导向的烟草控制研究框架:呼吁采取集体行动实现范式转变。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2023 Jan 1;25(1):73-76. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac110.
7
Adopting an intersectionality framework to address power and equity in medicine.采用交叉性框架来解决医学中的权力和公平问题。
Lancet. 2021 Mar 6;397(10277):857-859. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32513-7. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
8
Intersectionality and syndemics: A commentary.交叉性与综合征:评论。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Feb;295:113783. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113783. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
9
Gendered health systems: evidence from low- and middle-income countries.性别平等的卫生系统:来自中低收入国家的证据。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 6;16(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0338-5.
10
Towards a Feminist Global Health Policy: Power, intersectionality, and transformation.迈向女性主义全球卫生政策:权力、交叉性与变革
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Mar 7;4(3):e0002959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002959. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolving Power Dynamics in Global Health: From Biomedical Hegemony to Market Dynamics in Global Health Financing; A Response to the Recent Commentaries.全球卫生领域不断演变的权力动态:从生物医学霸权到全球卫生融资中的市场动态;对近期评论的回应
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:8264. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.8264. Epub 2023 Oct 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Framing and the formation of global health priorities.框架与全球卫生重点的形成。
Lancet. 2022 May 21;399(10339):1977-1990. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00584-0. Epub 2022 May 17.
2
Power Dynamics Among Health Professionals in Nigeria: A Case Study of the Global Fund Policy Process.尼日利亚卫生专业人员之间的权力动态:全球基金政策过程案例研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 19;11(12):2876-2885. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6097. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
3
Power analysis in health policy and systems research: a guide to research conceptualisation.卫生政策和体系研究中的功效分析:研究概念化指南。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Nov;6(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007268.
4
Transforming global health through equity-driven funding.通过公平驱动的资金投入来变革全球健康。
Nat Med. 2021 Jul;27(7):1136-1138. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01422-6.
5
Addressing power asymmetries in global health: Imperatives in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.应对全球卫生中的权力不对称:新冠疫情后的当务之急。
PLoS Med. 2021 Apr 22;18(4):e1003604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003604. eCollection 2021 Apr.
6
A Draconian Law: Examining the Navigation of Coalition Politics and Policy Reform by Health Provider Associations in Karnataka, India.一项严厉的法律:审视印度卡纳塔克邦医疗服务提供者协会的联盟政治与政策改革之道。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2021 Aug 1;46(4):703-730. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8970895.
7
Unpacking the implementation blackbox using 'actor interface analysis': how did actor relations and practices of power influence delivery of a free entitlement health policy in India?运用“行为者界面分析”拆解实施黑箱:行为者关系与权力实践如何影响印度一项免费应享医疗政策的实施?
Health Policy Plan. 2020 Nov 1;35(Supplement_2):ii74-ii83. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa125.
8
Governance of the Covid-19 response: a call for more inclusive and transparent decision-making.新冠疫情应对的治理:呼吁更具包容性和透明度的决策。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 May;5(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002655.
9
A framework for medical power in two case studies of health policymaking in India and Niger.在印度和尼日尔的两项卫生决策制定案例研究中构建医疗权力框架。
Glob Public Health. 2019 Apr;14(4):542-554. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2018.1457705. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
10
Malaria dreams: postwar visions of health and development in the Third World.疟疾之梦:战后对第三世界健康与发展的愿景
Med Anthropol. 1997 May;17(3):279-96. doi: 10.1080/01459740.1997.9966141.