Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Center for Muscle and Joint Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7031. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7031. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
Global policy to guide action on musculoskeletal (MSK) health is in a nascent phase. Lagging behind other non-communicable diseases (NCDs) there is currently little global policy to assist governments to develop national approaches to MSK health. Considering the importance of comparison and learning for global policy development, we aimed to perform a comparative analysis of national MSK policies to identify areas of innovation and draw common themes and principles that could guide MSK health policy.
Multi-modal search strategy incorporating a systematic online search targeted at the 30 most populated nations; a call to networked experts; a specified question in a related eDelphi questionnaire; and snowballing methods. Extracted data were organised using an framework adapted from the World Health Organization (WHO) Building Blocks and further inductive coding. Subsequently, texts were open coded and thematically analysed to derive specific sub-themes and principles underlying texts within each theme, serving as abstracted, transferable concepts for future global policy.
The search yielded 165 documents with 41 retained after removal of duplicates and exclusions. Only three documents were comprehensive national strategies addressing MSK health. The most common conditions addressed in the documents were pain (non-cancer), low back pain, occupational health, inflammatory conditions, and osteoarthritis. Across eight categories, we derived 47 sub-themes with transferable principles that could guide global policy for: service delivery; workforce; medicines and technologies; financing; data and information systems; leadership and governance; citizens, consumers and communities; and research and innovation.
There are few examples of national strategic policy to address MSK health; however, many countries are moving towards this by documenting the burden of disease and developing policies for MSK services. This review found a breadth of principles that can add to this existing work and may be adopted to develop comprehensive system-wide MSK health approaches at national and global levels.
全球指导肌肉骨骼健康行动的政策尚处于起步阶段。与其他非传染性疾病相比,目前几乎没有全球政策来帮助各国制定肌肉骨骼健康方法。考虑到比较和学习对于全球政策制定的重要性,我们旨在对国家肌肉骨骼政策进行比较分析,以确定创新领域,并总结可指导肌肉骨骼健康政策的共同主题和原则。
采用多模式搜索策略,包括针对人口最多的 30 个国家的系统在线搜索;向网络专家发出呼吁;在相关电子德尔斐问卷调查中提出具体问题;以及滚雪球方法。使用世界卫生组织(WHO)构建模块改编的框架组织提取的数据,并进行归纳编码。随后,对文本进行开放式编码和主题分析,以得出每个主题下文本所依据的具体子主题和原则,作为未来全球政策的抽象、可转移概念。
搜索共产生了 165 份文件,去除重复项和排除项后保留了 41 份。仅有三份文件是全面的国家肌肉骨骼健康战略。文件中最常见的疾病是疼痛(非癌症)、下腰痛、职业健康、炎症性疾病和骨关节炎。在八个类别中,我们得出了 47 个子主题和可转移的原则,可指导全球政策在以下方面的实施:服务提供;劳动力;药物和技术;融资;数据和信息系统;领导力和治理;公民、消费者和社区;以及研究和创新。
几乎没有国家战略政策来解决肌肉骨骼健康问题的例子;然而,许多国家正在通过记录疾病负担和制定肌肉骨骼服务政策来朝着这个方向发展。本研究发现了一系列原则,可以为现有工作增添内容,并可能被采纳,以在国家和全球层面制定全面的肌肉骨骼健康系统方法。