Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Health, Nutrition and Population Global Practice, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:6767. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6767. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
Burkina Faso has been implementing financing reforms towards universal health coverage (UHC) since 2006. Recently, the country introduced a performance-based financing (PBF) program as well as user fee removal (gratuité) policy for health services aimed at pregnant and lactating women and children under 5. We aim to assess the effect of and PBF policies on facility-based out-of-pocket expenditures (OOPEs) for outpatient services.
Our study is a controlled pre- and post-test design using healthcare facility data from the PBF program's impact evaluation collected in 2014 and 2017. We compared OOPE related to primary healthcare use incurred by children under 5 and individuals above 5 to assess the effect of the policy on OOPE. We further compared OOPE incurred by individuals residing in PBF districts and non-PBF districts to estimate the effect of the PBF on OOPE. Effects were estimated using difference-in-differences models, distinguishing the estimation of the probability of incurring OOPE from the estimation of the magnitude of OOPE using a generalized linear model (GLM).
The proportion of children under 5 incurring OOPE declined significantly from 90% in 2014 to 3% in 2017. Concurrently, mean OOPE also decreased. Differences in both the probability of incurring OOPE and mean OOPE between PBF and non-PBF facilities were small. Our difference in differences estimates indicated that gratuité produced an 84% (CI -86%, -81%) reduction in the probability of incurring OOPE and reduced total OOPE by 54% (CI 63%, 42%). We detected no significant effects of PBF, either in reducing the probability of incurring OOPE or in its magnitude.
User fee removal is an effective demand-side intervention for enhancing financial accessibility. As a supply-side intervention, PBF appears to have limited effects on reducing financial burden.
布基纳法索自 2006 年以来一直在实施融资改革,以实现全民健康覆盖(UHC)。最近,该国推出了一项基于绩效的融资(PBF)计划和卫生服务的免费政策,旨在惠及孕妇和哺乳期妇女以及 5 岁以下儿童。我们旨在评估 和 PBF 政策对门诊服务机构的自付支出(OOPE)的影响。
我们的研究采用了对照前后测试设计,使用了 2014 年和 2017 年 PBF 计划影响评估中收集的医疗保健机构数据。我们比较了 5 岁以下儿童和 5 岁以上个体因初级保健使用而产生的 OOPE,以评估 政策对 OOPE 的影响。我们进一步比较了居住在 PBF 区和非 PBF 区的个体的 OOPE,以估计 PBF 对 OOPE 的影响。使用差异中的差异模型估计效果,使用广义线性模型(GLM)分别估计 OOPE 发生的概率和 OOPE 的幅度。
2014 年,5 岁以下儿童发生 OOPE 的比例从 90%显著下降到 2017 年的 3%。同期,平均 OOPE 也有所下降。PBF 和非 PBF 设施之间 OOPE 发生的概率和平均 OOPE 的差异很小。我们的差异中的差异估计表明,免费政策使 OOPE 发生的概率降低了 84%(置信区间为-86%,-81%),总 OOPE 减少了 54%(置信区间为 63%,42%)。我们没有检测到 PBF 在降低 OOPE 发生的概率或其幅度方面的显著影响。
取消自费是增强财务可及性的有效需求侧干预措施。作为一种供给侧干预措施,PBF 似乎对减轻经济负担的影响有限。