School of Public Health, Centre for Public Health Research, University of Montreal, Pavillon 7101 avenue du Parc, C.P 6128 Succursale C, local 3224, Montreal, QuébecH3C 3J7, Canada.
Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Aug;24(12):3768-3779. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021000732. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
To examine the effect of an intervention combining user fees removal with community-based management of undernutrition on the nutrition status in children under 5 years of age in Burkina Faso.
The study was a non-equivalent control group post-test-only design based on household survey data collected 4 years after the intervention onset in the intervention and comparison districts. Additionally, we used propensity score weighting to achieve balance on covariates between the two districts, followed by logistic multilevel modelling.
Two health districts in the Sahel region.
Totally, 1116 children under 5 years of age residing in 41 intervention communities and 1305 from 51 control communities.
When comparing children living in the intervention district to children living in a non-intervention district, we determined no differences in terms of stunting (OR = 1·13; 95 % CI 0·83, 1·54) and wasting (OR = 1·21; 95 % CI 0·90, 1·64), nor in severely wasted (OR = 1·27; 95 % CI 0·79, 2·04) and severely stunted (OR = 0·99; 95 % CI 0·76, 1·26). However, we determined that 3 % of the variance of wasting (95 % CI 1·25, 10·42) and 9·4 % of the variance of stunting (95 % CI 6·45, 13·38) were due to systematic differences between communities of residence. The presence of the intervention in the communities explained 2 % of the community-level variance of stunting and 3 % of the community-level variance of wasting.
With the scaling-up of the national free health policy in Africa, we stress the need for rigorous evaluations and the means to measure expected changes in order to better inform health interventions.
研究在布基纳法索,以社区为基础的营养不良管理来消除用户费用,这一干预措施对 5 岁以下儿童营养状况的影响。
本研究是基于家庭调查数据的非均等对照组后测设计,数据收集于干预和对照区开始干预后 4 年。此外,我们还使用倾向评分加权来实现两个区之间协变量的平衡,然后进行逻辑多层建模。
萨赫勒地区的两个卫生区。
共有 1116 名 5 岁以下儿童居住在干预社区的 41 个社区,1305 名儿童居住在对照社区的 51 个社区。
将居住在干预区的儿童与居住在非干预区的儿童进行比较,我们发现两组在发育迟缓(OR=1.13;95%CI0.83,1.54)和消瘦(OR=1.21;95%CI0.90,1.64)方面没有差异,也没有严重消瘦(OR=1.27;95%CI0.79,2.04)和严重发育迟缓(OR=0.99;95%CI0.76,1.26)方面的差异。然而,我们发现消瘦的 3%(95%CI1.25,10.42)和发育迟缓的 9.4%(95%CI6.45,13.38)的方差差异是由于居住社区之间存在系统差异。社区干预的存在解释了社区层面发育迟缓方差的 2%和消瘦方差的 3%。
随着非洲国家免费卫生政策的扩大,我们强调需要进行严格的评估,并提供衡量预期变化的手段,以便更好地为卫生干预措施提供信息。