Department of Sociology and Social Work, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7523. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7523. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
This article discusses the work of Borst et al in which they suggest 'sustaining work' as a term that covers the efforts of actors to sustain the use of health research in policy and practice through three practices. I suggest that two of these, and , need to be further unpacked to understand how and why they are important for sustaining work in knowledge translation (KT). To contribute here, I discuss KT as processes of organizational change that occurs within and across organizations, often involving actors with different views on and approaches to the use of health research in policy and practice. These actors will likely have very different understandings of what the context for using research is and they are likely be members of competing or conflicting institutions. Future research needs to take such elements into account to improve our understanding and practice of sustaining work.
本文讨论了 Borst 等人的工作,他们提出“持续工作”这一术语,涵盖了行动者通过三种实践来维持健康研究在政策和实践中的应用的努力。我认为其中两个, 和 ,需要进一步剖析,以了解它们为何以及如何对知识转化(KT)的持续工作很重要。为了在这里做出贡献,我将 KT 讨论为组织内部和跨组织发生的组织变革过程,通常涉及对政策和实践中使用健康研究的看法和方法不同的行动者。这些行动者可能对使用研究的背景有非常不同的理解,并且他们可能是竞争或冲突机构的成员。未来的研究需要考虑到这些因素,以提高我们对持续工作的理解和实践。